2002 CR-V Brakes

Discussion in 'CR-V' started by Steve Bigelow, Jul 15, 2004.

  1. Steve Bigelow

    Steve Bigelow Guest

    Why?

    They aren't the same size.
     
    Steve Bigelow, Jul 15, 2004
    #1
  2. Steve Bigelow

    Keith allen Guest

    Can someone enlighten me as to why the rear disc brakes are worn out but
    the front are at 50% ? I tho't the fronts would wear down first.

    Keith
     
    Keith allen, Jul 15, 2004
    #2
  3. Steve Bigelow

    Brian Smith Guest

    I know what you're thinking, I thought the same way, when my Accord's rear
    pads had to be replaced with only 89,000 km on them. I managed to get
    113,800 km on the front pads, before having to replace them.

    --
    Brian

    www.cakesbydarlene.ca

    www.accesswave.ca/~orion
     
    Brian Smith, Jul 15, 2004
    #3
  4. Steve Bigelow

    J. Guest

    Better answer than most I've seen in the newsgroups. Certainly agrees with
    my 90 Prelude experience. I replaced my rear pads at 105Kmiles (and no they
    were not completely worn down) while the fronts still had over 50% left when
    I sold the car at 130Kmiles.

    J.
     
    J., Jul 15, 2004
    #4
  5. Steve Bigelow

    tflfb Guest

    Disc brakes (rear) on a 2002, didn't know that thought they were still
    shoes.

    Tom
     
    tflfb, Jul 15, 2004
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. Does my 95 Accord have ABS brakes?

  2. 1998 accord rear brakes question - URGENT

  3. Odyssey brakes question

  4. Rear disk brakes

  5. chirpy rear brakes on 98 Civic sedan

  6. 2002 Accord Rear Brakes

  7. 2002 Honda Odyssey brakes

  8. New Odyssey - first time I apply brakes in morning I hear "clack", "clack" from rear brakes - should

Loading...