2005 CR-V vs. Mazda 6 Wagon

Discussion in 'CR-V' started by PMah, Dec 12, 2004.

  1. PMah

    PMah Guest

    Hey all,

    Just wanted to get your thoughts on the comparison of these 2
    vehicles. I'm "between stages"...compacts are too small now and vans
    are too big (plus, no kids yet!) so, what i was thinking of was a
    larger (in terms of cargo space) sedan or a small SUV. without boring
    you with details, I narrowed the list down to the CR-V and the M6
    wagon. i like the styling of the wagon, but i like the safety and
    versatility of the CR-V. has anybody had any experience with either
    vehicle?

    thanx for the opinions!
    PM
     
    PMah, Dec 12, 2004
    #1
  2. PMah

    Saintor Guest

    The Mazda has a V6 standard and while it hurts the fuel economy, it would be
    my choice.

    However, the M6 is a more family-oriented car IMO and a CR-V might be a
    better fit to your lifestyle.
     
    Saintor, Dec 12, 2004
    #2
  3. That V6 engine is made by Ford. Case closed!

    The CR-V is a good choice, but don't overlook the Toyota RAV4.
     
    Imminent Vengeance, Dec 12, 2004
    #3
  4. PMah

    Saintor Guest

    Ford is the same carmaker that manufactures the 12000 NYC cabs that
    routinely reach 300000 miles on the original powertrain. Not at the top of
    their class for efficency, but we are far from the first serie of American
    Escort.
     
    Saintor, Dec 12, 2004
    #4
  5. Yeah, but you don't know how much $$$ these cab companies forked out to
    keep their cabs running. It is cheaper for them to do that instead of
    buying all new vehicles.
     
    Imminent Vengeance, Dec 12, 2004
    #5
  6. PMah

    Saintor Guest

    Except for gas, they are cheap to run. Low price parts, very resistant
    powertrain, suspension & steering components. Important reason why the
    Crown Vic are so used for fleets in North America.
     
    Saintor, Dec 12, 2004
    #6
  7. PMah

    Keith J Guest

    The CR-V is a good choice but to me it is boring. No power. I have driven
    the '04 Mazda 6 V6 sedan and the '04 CR-V. The 6 will bring a smile to your
    face as it has plenty of power, but you are paying for a lot more vehicle.
    Plus you are also comparing vehicles that are not comparable, one is a
    mini-SUV while the other one is a wagon.

    (I am not a ford guy) but I really liked the V6 Ford Escape. plenty of
    power and fun to drive.

    Don't get a vehicle because it is practical, get one because you can't wait
    to drive it hard and feel performance/handling. If you want cargo space, go
    find yourself an old $500 pickup

    good luck
     
    Keith J, Dec 13, 2004
    #7
  8. PMah

    LBJGH Guest

    Something you may want to look into is if the SUV's and cars have to meet
    the same crash tests standards. At one point trucks didn't have to meet the
    same standards as cars.

    Also, the car will handle a LOT better than any SUV (mini or not) but a lot
    of people with poor eye sight claim they can see better in an SUV.
     
    LBJGH, Dec 13, 2004
    #8
  9. PMah

    Todd Guest

    Hello,
    I don't really know much about the Mazda (it looks nice)but I do know
    about the CRV. Mine is a 2002 EX with about 33,200 miles. I am
    very pleased with my purchase still and if I had to do it all over again I
    would. I haul my wife and my small son around and it hasn't
    let us down yet. I live in Central Illinois and I haven't had a snow
    yet the 4X4 hasn't got me where I needed to go. I have never been in
    a situation where I felt I didn't have enough power.
    Over all I think you get plenty of good vehicle for your money. This
    is my 4th Honda so I am a little biased I beleive but there are plenty of
    name plates out there which I would buy.

    I believe you are not comapring apples to apples with the Mazda 6 wagon
    and the CRV.

    Good luck with your choice


    Todd
     
    Todd, Dec 13, 2004
    #9
  10. PMah

    Saintor Guest

    The CR-V will be safer with the help of VSA (ESP) now available for '05.
    This and the fact that it stands higher.
     
    Saintor, Dec 13, 2004
    #10
  11. PMah

    Larry B. Guest

    Just my two cents worth. How about considering a Subaru. They are all wheel
    drive, very safe and pretty reliable. They give you the choice of several
    different engine also. A good overall vehicle that can be had in various
    forms including a wagon.


    Larry B.
     
    Larry B., Dec 13, 2004
    #11
  12. Safety of a CRV? What makes you think it is safer than the Mazda 6? If
    I was shopping I would take the 6 over the CRV simply because it handles
    much better. That is an often overlooked safety feature.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Dec 14, 2004
    #12
  13. PMah

    Milleron Guest

    Not to mention that the Mazda 6 sedan achieved the highest possible
    rating in the offset crash test. The wagon's not been tested yet, but
    its front end is identical to the sedan's. No matter what they do to
    an SUV, it'll always be more likely to roll than a wagon. And there's
    a standing joke among Denver police that almost all the vehicles found
    off the road after the first snowfall are SUVs (driven by dopes who
    think their vehicles can handle snow so well that they ignore the fact
    that they can't stop any faster than anyone else).
    Ron
     
    Milleron, Dec 14, 2004
    #13
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.