2006 Hondas

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by MAT, Jul 8, 2005.

  1. MAT

    Elle Guest

    Bullshit. I raised the point ONLY to compare the Jazz and Fit to my Civic.

    RTFP.
     
    Elle, Jul 14, 2005
    #41
  2. And you compared the engine horsepower of those cars, without regard to
    each car's mass.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Jul 14, 2005
    #42
  3. MAT

    SoCalMike Guest

    whats the diff between the fit and the jazz?
     
    SoCalMike, Jul 14, 2005
    #43
  4. MAT

    jim beam Guest

    will you kids please grow up?
     
    jim beam, Jul 15, 2005
    #44
  5. MAT

    Elle Guest

    All you've done is joined the fray and kept Joseph ignorant.
     
    Elle, Jul 15, 2005
    #45
  6. HP = T*N/5252

    Where T = Torque (lbft)
    N = Speed (rpm)

    Where did that 5252 come from????

    A:The 5252 is a made up synthetic number.

    You do the math.
     
    Joseph Oberlander, Jul 15, 2005
    #46
  7. My original post about this point was comparing the U.S. version
    and lamentinhg that we couldn't get the 1.2 as it was much more
    efficient for a paltry amount of loss in power.
     
    Joseph Oberlander, Jul 15, 2005
    #47
  8. JUst the name. In the U.K., they sell a version with
    a tuned for maximum efficiency 1.2l engine. 60mpg highway
    and about 50mpg overall efficiency. No hybrid nonsense
    and it's not a tin can Smart Car or Mini, either.
     
    Joseph Oberlander, Jul 15, 2005
    #48
  9. MAT

    Elle Guest

    The units that attach to the 5252 are (rev-ft-lb/min) / (hp-radian). It is a
    "unity conversion factor," in the same way that 12 inches/foot and 1.34 hp /
    kw are both "unity conversion factors," as in

    length, inches = (length, feet) * 12

    power, hp = (power, kw) * 1.34
     
    Elle, Jul 15, 2005
    #49
  10. Makes no difference. It's derived from the amount of torque and
    how fast you are reving the engine. People have it backwards.
    They think that "Horsepower" is how powerful an engine is and
    it's really nearly useless in determining that. Of course,
    people do the same thing in audio - they honestly think that
    how many "watts" the receiver is rated for determines which
    one is better.
     
    Joseph Oberlander, Jul 17, 2005
    #50
  11. "Better" is a broad characterization which may include many factors
    including subjective ones. However, when it comes to the ability of
    an engine to do work (such as accelerating a car) power is the primary
    determinant.

    If you have an engine that produces 10000 ft*lb at 10 rpm but won't
    turn any faster, you are goining to be very slow even though you have
    lots of torque. You will get beaten by a car of identical weight with
    100 hp at 10,000 rpm every time. He will blow your doors off, even
    though he might have peak torque of less than 1% of your engine.
    orque alone doesn't matter. It's power that moves the car. Sorry.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Jul 17, 2005
    #51
  12. MAT

    Elle Guest

    You just changed your claim above that, "All that matters is torque.
    Period."
    Horsepower is commonly and rightly accepted as one measure of how powerful
    an engine is.

    The thread speaks for itself. I withdraw.
     
    Elle, Jul 17, 2005
    #52
  13. Except that it only takes about 40-50hp to maintain 70mph. That
    one car can do 140 and the other only 100mph really means nothing.
    (It's not as drastic as you imply for automobiles)
     
    Joseph Oberlander, Jul 19, 2005
    #53
  14. Yet this is as meaningless as "watts" are in audio. That it is
    commonly accepted as such is meaningless. Torque is how powerful
    the engine is. The rest is gearing, and any idiot can calculate
    ratios or add another gear to the transmission.
     
    Joseph Oberlander, Jul 19, 2005
    #54
  15. Watts are not at all regarded as meaningless in audio. The unit is
    misunderstood, misused, and like horesepower, does not tell the whole story.
    You might want to review your basic physics with regard to the meanings of
    the terms torque and power.

    Leonard
     
    Leonard Caillouet, Jul 19, 2005
    #55
  16. MAT

    Leon Guest

    Elle is right, horsepower is the only unit that makes sense to use.
    For example, the typical civic needs 70HP to do 100mph and 90HP to do
    110mph. Try to use torque to describe the same and write half a page
    of meaningless equations.
     
    Leon, Jul 19, 2005
    #56
  17. MAT

    Elle Guest

    Hey, where'd you get the numbers? I'm not disputing them; I'm just curious.

    I remember researching the horsepower for cruising (ya know, normal speeds),
    and I think it was around 20 to 30 hp. But as big an issue is how well a car
    accelerates. That's when the horsepower becomes an important metric and
    crude measure of how well a car will accelerate.

    Torque and RPM certainly both have their place in discussions of what one
    wants an engine to do, but I'd never dismiss hp the way Joseph chooses to
    do. For now, anyway.
     
    Elle, Jul 19, 2005
    #57
  18. MAT

    SoCalMike Guest

    the way i understand it, the number advertised is "peak", which is the
    most the head unit will put out, and often lasts a millisecond. if i
    turn my blaupunkt all the way up, it sounds crappy. the speakers can
    handle the wattage (40x4) but the head unit strains to deliver. i need
    an amp...

    but what to get? 2 channel or 4 channel?
     
    SoCalMike, Jul 20, 2005
    #58
  19. MAT

    Leon Guest

    http://www.pumaracing.co.uk/topspeed.htm
    Extremely accurate calculations, I've verified them against various
    FWD cars.
     
    Leon, Jul 20, 2005
    #59
  20. MAT

    Elle Guest

    Nice!

    Thanks.
     
    Elle, Jul 20, 2005
    #60
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.