93 CIVIC EX ABS LIGHT STAYING ON...

Discussion in 'Civic' started by septicman, Jul 27, 2008.

  1. septicman

    septicman Guest

    When you start the engine, the ABS light goes right off. Then, at
    about 10 MPH, it goes on and stays on.

    Any ideas as to what it most likely is? It just started doing this.
    Stopped car, shut off engine, start it, then it goes on at around 10
    MPH, tried it several time.

    Thanks in advance for what to look for !!!
     
    septicman, Jul 27, 2008
    #1
  2. septicman

    motsco_ Guest

    ---------------------

    It's telling you there's a wheel sensor not checking in. Clean the tone
    rings of grease and dirt, using a scrubber brush or a small brass
    toothbrush.

    'Curly'
     
    motsco_, Jul 27, 2008
    #2
  3. septicman

    motsco_ Guest

    ---------------------

    It's telling you there's a wheel sensor not checking in. Clean the tone
    rings of grease and dirt, using a scrubber brush or a small brass
    toothbrush.

    'Curly'
     
    motsco_, Jul 27, 2008
    #3
  4. septicman

    jim beam Guest

    why don't you read the code?
     
    jim beam, Jul 28, 2008
    #4
  5. septicman

    jim beam Guest

    why don't you read the code?
     
    jim beam, Jul 28, 2008
    #5
  6. septicman

    AZ Nomad Guest

    Nah. Isn't replacing the entire system one part at a time more fun?
     
    AZ Nomad, Jul 28, 2008
    #6
  7. septicman

    AZ Nomad Guest

    Nah. Isn't replacing the entire system one part at a time more fun?
     
    AZ Nomad, Jul 28, 2008
    #7
  8. septicman

    jim beam Guest

    for him, sure, but for the rest of us, it's a waste of freakin' bandwidth.
     
    jim beam, Jul 28, 2008
    #8
  9. septicman

    jim beam Guest

    for him, sure, but for the rest of us, it's a waste of freakin' bandwidth.
     
    jim beam, Jul 28, 2008
    #9
  10. septicman

    AZ Nomad Guest

    The auto newsgroups need a FAQ like the sci.electronics.repair FAQ.

    I've seen so many so amateur mechanics who are so clueless about
    troubleshooting procedure that it isn't funny. For example, I once
    had a room-mate who's car had died and he was walking to/from work for
    a week. He had a friend over who was in the process of ripping the
    dash apart and I asked him what he'd checked so far. He was starting
    at the ignition switch. I joked that he should check if there was air
    in the tires, and **** me drunk, he was about to follow my advice.

    I took over and started right at the ignition system. Pulled a wire,
    had him crank the engine and there was a nice fat spark. Next: fuel
    system. Asked if there was gas in the car. They didn't know, the
    fuel guage was broken. I pulled the gas cap and rocked the car and
    didn't hear any splashing. The car had run out of gas right at the
    moment it was parked and couldn't start again.

    People need to learn some trouble shooting skills before they start
    asking questions like "my car won't start; what part should I replace?"

    I've been guilty of the same thing. I had an acura integra that
    wouldn't start. No spark. Checked the coil and it measured good.
    Replaced the ignitor. Still no spark. Was about to replace the
    output transister of the ECU, but was so impressed with its internal
    aerospace quality, that I decided to keep looking elsewhere. Put the
    ECU->ignitor signal on an osciloscope and saw a pulse. Replaced the
    coil that had measured good. Fixed the problem and only wasted $90
    which was more than a mechanic would have charged to diagnose and
    repair it in the first place.
     
    AZ Nomad, Jul 28, 2008
    #10
  11. septicman

    AZ Nomad Guest

    The auto newsgroups need a FAQ like the sci.electronics.repair FAQ.

    I've seen so many so amateur mechanics who are so clueless about
    troubleshooting procedure that it isn't funny. For example, I once
    had a room-mate who's car had died and he was walking to/from work for
    a week. He had a friend over who was in the process of ripping the
    dash apart and I asked him what he'd checked so far. He was starting
    at the ignition switch. I joked that he should check if there was air
    in the tires, and **** me drunk, he was about to follow my advice.

    I took over and started right at the ignition system. Pulled a wire,
    had him crank the engine and there was a nice fat spark. Next: fuel
    system. Asked if there was gas in the car. They didn't know, the
    fuel guage was broken. I pulled the gas cap and rocked the car and
    didn't hear any splashing. The car had run out of gas right at the
    moment it was parked and couldn't start again.

    People need to learn some trouble shooting skills before they start
    asking questions like "my car won't start; what part should I replace?"

    I've been guilty of the same thing. I had an acura integra that
    wouldn't start. No spark. Checked the coil and it measured good.
    Replaced the ignitor. Still no spark. Was about to replace the
    output transister of the ECU, but was so impressed with its internal
    aerospace quality, that I decided to keep looking elsewhere. Put the
    ECU->ignitor signal on an osciloscope and saw a pulse. Replaced the
    coil that had measured good. Fixed the problem and only wasted $90
    which was more than a mechanic would have charged to diagnose and
    repair it in the first place.
     
    AZ Nomad, Jul 28, 2008
    #11
  12. septicman

    jim beam Guest

    the ones that piss me off are the ones that /try/ to fix things, foul
    something up, frequently unrelated to the first, /then/ want it fixed
    while all the time insisting that they didn't touch anything.

    moral of the story: don't trust a single word people tell you on
    diagnostics - always do it yourself.

    any [honda] manual relying on a simple resistance test of a coil is
    wasting a whole bunch of peoples time and money. modern potted coils
    frequently pass the resistance test ok, but flash over internally and
    are consequently useless. the only reliable test is to manually trigger
    the igniter unit and see if the coil sparks a test plug.
     
    jim beam, Jul 28, 2008
    #12
  13. septicman

    jim beam Guest

    the ones that piss me off are the ones that /try/ to fix things, foul
    something up, frequently unrelated to the first, /then/ want it fixed
    while all the time insisting that they didn't touch anything.

    moral of the story: don't trust a single word people tell you on
    diagnostics - always do it yourself.

    any [honda] manual relying on a simple resistance test of a coil is
    wasting a whole bunch of peoples time and money. modern potted coils
    frequently pass the resistance test ok, but flash over internally and
    are consequently useless. the only reliable test is to manually trigger
    the igniter unit and see if the coil sparks a test plug.
     
    jim beam, Jul 28, 2008
    #13
  14. septicman

    AZ Nomad Guest

    I never thought of that. I think I was afraid of frying the ignitor
    with a too long pulse or too high a voltage pulse as would be the case
    if you touched it with a wire to 12V. Also, I didn't mention it
    earlier, but the ECU threw no codes. The output was clearly open loop.
     
    AZ Nomad, Jul 28, 2008
    #14
  15. septicman

    AZ Nomad Guest

    I never thought of that. I think I was afraid of frying the ignitor
    with a too long pulse or too high a voltage pulse as would be the case
    if you touched it with a wire to 12V. Also, I didn't mention it
    earlier, but the ECU threw no codes. The output was clearly open loop.
     
    AZ Nomad, Jul 28, 2008
    #15
  16. septicman

    jim beam Guest

    i've not been able to fry an igniter testing like this. great way of
    testing both in fact. only if you get a "fail" do you have to
    differentiate between them.
     
    jim beam, Jul 28, 2008
    #16
  17. septicman

    jim beam Guest

    i've not been able to fry an igniter testing like this. great way of
    testing both in fact. only if you get a "fail" do you have to
    differentiate between them.
     
    jim beam, Jul 28, 2008
    #17
  18. septicman

    AZ Nomad Guest

    Besides, if it is a part that is going to be replaced anyway, (as was
    the case for me), there's no harm in potentially frying it
     
    AZ Nomad, Jul 28, 2008
    #18
  19. septicman

    AZ Nomad Guest

    Besides, if it is a part that is going to be replaced anyway, (as was
    the case for me), there's no harm in potentially frying it
     
    AZ Nomad, Jul 28, 2008
    #19
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.