94 Accord - tires?

Discussion in 'Accord' started by Peabody, Dec 14, 2006.

  1. Peabody

    ACAR Guest

    they're not trying to hide that connection
    Yeah, I did notice that.

    as pointed out
    I also found, at a Chevron site, the cost differential between PAO and
    Group III+; their published estimate $1.50-$2.00/gallon
    (http://www.chevron.com/products/prodserv/BaseOils/pdf/0701c.pdf). Yup,
    Mobil 1 could be PAO based for the cost of about $3 per 5-quart jug.
    You'd think someone in their marketing dept would figure that buyers
    sophisticated enough to have made Mobil 1 a hit when it cost 3 times as
    much as other oils would be happy to spend the extra $3/jug for a PAO
    product.
     
    ACAR, Dec 21, 2006
    #21
  2. Peabody

    jim beam Guest

    well detected - that's a great find. but i'm not 100% sure the author
    has the full story - he says that m1 is still pao, but the msds
    contradicts that - i have to go with the msds rather than the market
    analyst.

    interesting comment on cost. you're right, that's not much difference
    to differentiate a "boutique" product. doubtless someone has done the
    math on what price the market will bear for a true branded labeled pao
    vs. groupIII, and has concluded that the incremental profit on gIII is
    just too irresistible. and is doubtless producing a handsome bonus for
    the line manager responsible! hence we have secrecy to keep the
    consumer in the dark.
     
    jim beam, Dec 21, 2006
    #22
  3. Peabody

    ACAR Guest

    note 2001 date on article

    but the msds
    I'm sure the more recent msds is correct.

    The article offers hope re. return of PAO. Competition will force down
    the price of "synthetic" oils (I've got a coupon from Pep Boys for $15
    off on a case of Pennzoil or Quaker State). Once that happens it will
    be easier to put PAO back into M1 and market accordingly. Well, maybe.
     
    ACAR, Dec 22, 2006
    #23
  4. Peabody

    ACAR Guest

    But if the consumer were to find out, their core business model is
    toast. Murphy's Law.

    Smackdown!
    Naked emperor syndrome vs. Murphy's Law
    - film at 11
     
    ACAR, Dec 22, 2006
    #24
  5. Peabody

    jim beam Guest

    well, some consumers stay away when they lose confidence, but not all.
    after all, you want to retire, right? what do you do with your
    retirement savings? most people have some exposure to the stock market
    regardless. they may adjust the extent of that exposure, and weight in
    companies they feel safest, but they pretty much have to be in, whether
    it's directly or indirectly.
     
    jim beam, Dec 22, 2006
    #25
  6. Peabody

    jim beam Guest

    an after-word on that: i wrote part of that wiki article, and keep an
    eye on it from time to time. it's been interesting how persistent is
    the problem of keeping that msds info up there. i can't say for sure
    that it's manufacturers directly doing the removal, but it's remarkable
    coincidence that it's only the mobil and amsoil links that seem to
    disappear - with amusing regularity. i predict that the msds info
    itself will disappear next.
     
    jim beam, Dec 22, 2006
    #26
  7. Peabody

    ACAR Guest

    no risk there...
    kinda hard to spin up another NYSE
    competitive online tire stores already exist
     
    ACAR, Dec 22, 2006
    #27
  8. Peabody

    slim Guest

    Most of my driving is in and around NYC. I had a set of Toyo Spectrum's
    on my 96 Civic coupe for 37K miles. I loved them, a very good
    all-around tire. I now have Pirelli 400's and after 7500 miles, I think
    they are as good as the Toyo's...but we have not gotten snow here, so
    the jury is still out.
     
    slim, Dec 24, 2006
    #28
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.