'96 Accord 90K preventive maintenance

Discussion in 'Accord' started by Mike, Nov 30, 2004.

  1. Mike

    Mike Guest

    Hi,

    1st time on here...

    Honda recommends preventive maintenance replacement of water pump and timing
    belt at 90K.
    I'm at 91K now and things are running fine with my '96 Accord coupe (4cyl
    Vtec auto).
    Should I have it done now by Honda ($800), find a good back-alley guy, or
    just wait for something to happen?

    Thanks in advance,

    Mike
     
    Mike, Nov 30, 2004
    #1
  2. Mike

    Howard Guest

    DO NOT WAIT!
    You do not want to wait for something to happen. If your belt breaks you can
    cause major engine damage. That $800. figure will pale in comparison. When a
    timing belt fails, there is no warning, so don't be fooled by how your car
    runs.
    If it were my car, I'd bring it to my dealer. I'd want to be sure that it's
    done right and with the best quality parts. Avoid all "back alley" guys. But
    if you do it outside of your dealer be sure of three things. First, be sure
    to do it right. Change all of the following: timing belt, balance belt,
    alternator belt, power steering belt, air conditioner belt, water pump,
    camshaft seal, balance shaft seal (make sure you have a retainer for this
    seal which was added by Honda later) and crankshaft seal and use Honda
    antifreeze to prevent any damage to your cooling system from the wrong
    coolant. Second, as I said before, use original Honda parts. They WILL last
    longest. Third, if your dealer does it, fine. If you do it elsewhere, be
    sure that person/shop is not just an experienced mechanic but is a Honda
    specialist. These three steps are the key to be lucky enough to have the
    opportunity to get you to be able to spend this much and more for the next
    time at 180,000 miles!
    Good luck,
    Howard
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Mike" <>
    Newsgroups: alt.autos.honda
    Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:05 AM
    Subject: '96 Accord 90K preventive maintenance
     
    Howard, Nov 30, 2004
    #2
  3. Mike

    Hank Guest

    Just wondering if anyone on this newsgroup has had a timing belt break on
    them
    and would like to share the experience with the group?
    The conditions at the time, such as the age and make of vehicle,
    mileage, damage that occurred, cost to repaid and end results.
     
    Hank, Nov 30, 2004
    #3
  4. Mike

    Howard Guest

    I've seen numerous broken timing belts. Some are disastrous and some are
    just a nuisance. It all depends on whether your motor is an "interference
    motor" or not. That means, is their any space between the piston and any
    hung open valve. If there is space then internal damage will not occur. You
    would have to tow the car to repair it and replace your timing belt and any
    other needed belts or items due for that type of maintenance. If there is no
    room between pistons and valves or your engine is an "interference motor"
    then when your motor is running (spinning) and your timing belt breaks the
    piston will smash in to the open valves and bend them. Depending on how fast
    your engine was turning (RPM) you may bend a majority or all your valves.
    You may even damage a piston. All bent valves and damaged pistons would need
    to be replaced if you wanted the engine to run again. I've seen the costs
    run from about $300 for no engine damage to a couple of thousand to replace
    valves and/or piston(s). Sometimes the cause is a frozen belt tensioner
    which should be inspected when repairing and replaced.
    Most of the time the failure has occurred after the factory specified
    mileage period for replacement when owners have ignored the maintenance
    schedules. But I have seen a few that have failed before the specified
    interval, though that is rare. It all depends on how a vehicle is maintained
    and under what conditions the vehicle is operated under. Normal or severe
    conditions require different timetables of maintenance.
    The most frequent end result I've seen is people will follow the recommended
    service intervals after going through that experience and then not have that
    problem again.
    And that is usually all that is required to make a Honda last and be
    dependable. Just follow the recommended service intervals from the factory.
    Don't let anyone sell you a service you don't need, such as an engine flush,
    transmission flush or anything beyond the factory intervals. If you follow
    them you usually won't need these unnecessary services because your Honda
    has been properly maintained.
    Howard
     
    Howard, Nov 30, 2004
    #4
  5. Mike

    Cuervo Guest

    Lost the timing belt on my 1986 Accord LXi Sedan at 60 miles per hour...
    coasted to a controlled stop...no engine damage. I was lucky. Happened in
    a construction zone...not pretty. Don't even risk it.
     
    Cuervo, Nov 30, 2004
    #5
  6. Howard is exactly right - don't wait for something to happen - absolutely
    guaranteed you won't like what happens, and it isn't a question of "if" but
    of "when."

    If you are really lucky and the engine is not grievously damaged, you at
    least won't get where you were going, your car will have to be towed, you
    will be without it until it is completed, and you will pay at least as much
    for the repair as you would have if you scheduled it. It's a losing game by
    any measure.

    The timing belt replacement should include replacement of the tensioner and
    the water pump. They are modestly priced, and the labor to get to them is
    about the same as to replace the timing belt.

    The dealer is worth it for the peace of mind. If the replacement belt fails
    early (it could happen, but isn't likely) and trashes the engine, the dealer
    can probably be pressured to make it right. I doubt you will get that from a
    small independent.

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, Dec 1, 2004
    #6
  7. Mike

    Hank Guest

    Why is Honda still using a timing belt, instead of a timing chain?
    Why would they not switch to a chain and eliminate this high cost
    maintenance item?
     
    Hank, Dec 1, 2004
    #7
  8. Timing chains are also high cost maintenance items. They may not break quite
    as often as timing belts do, but they can jump at even lower mileage than
    the replacement interval for timing belts.

    The normal failure mode for a chain is wear of the link pivot areas so the
    chain appears to stretch. Bicycle chains often "stretch" so much they are an
    entire link longer than a new one. I had a 1984 Dodge 600 (like a LeBaron)
    with a Mitsubishi power train, and I got rid of it at 90K miles because the
    timing chain had developed enough slack that it was rubbing on the timing
    chain cover in spite of the snubber being at the end of its travel. The
    first step in changing the timing chain: remove engine. Toyota engines in
    the 80s were notorious for chewing holes in the timing chain covers, and my
    #2 son and I spent most of a week changing the timing chain in his '82
    Corolla... about a month before it threw a rod (sob).

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, Dec 1, 2004
    #8
  9. Mike

    E. Meyer Guest

    Honda has switched to chains on the newer 4 cylinder engines. They are
    still using the belts on the 6s though the replacement interval has been
    extended to 105,000 miles.
     
    E. Meyer, Dec 1, 2004
    #9
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.