I've treated my 1996 Accord LX 4-cyl well. It's a great car, never complains, and is always ready to go. It's had all the scheduled services (or so I thought), plus a new oil pan after a quick change place overtightened the drain plug. It's low mileage - it only has 104,000 miles - but over the last year I've been driving it a lot more than before and taking it on cross-country trips every few months, so I like the peace of mind that having it well-maintained brings. At the beginning of the summer I had the radiator replaced at the first sign of leaking around the infamous crimp around the top. The timing belt was replaced at 90,000 miles. Looking at my records, though, I noticed that there was no mention of the water pump. I called my old dealer (I've moved and have a better dealer now), and was told that they don't replace the water pump with the first timing belt, because they almost never fail before the second timing belt. If I knew then what I know now, I would have had the pump replaced then. Water under the bridge. Now I'm about to go in for my 105,000 service. I'm wondering if I should have them go in and replace the water pump. I don't need a new timing belt, obviously, and it's a bad time for me to do this financially. I'd rather wait until 120,000 when I'll either have more cash or a new Honda altogether. I'd appreciate your thoughts on how urgent this is. My new dealer said he'd check at 105,000 to see if it was leaking, but otherwise it should be fine. But I've heard horror stories about water pumps seizing and causing the timing belt to break. Thanks for any insight on whether this will leave me stranded in the middle of nowhere before 120,000 miles. Josh