'97 CR-V: Removing rear driveshafts?

Discussion in 'CR-V' started by TeGGeR®, Oct 11, 2005.

  1. TeGGeR®

    TeGGeR® Guest

    I been approached privately by someone who was told that he could improve
    his gas mileage by removing the rear driveshafts in his AWD CR-V.

    Beyond telling him some basics, I could not answer his questions about
    potential damage to the drivetrain. So with his permission I'm posting the
    question on his behalf here.

    What he asked me:
    "I have a 1997 Honda CRV (automatic trans). Someone told me that if I
    wanted to improve the fuel economy, I could remove the rear driveshaft (as
    I really don't need the AWD feature). Supposedly that way the engine
    wouldn't be turning extra parts. Would this work? Would the transaxle
    send all the power to the front wheels? If so, would it be in a slip
    condition all the time and burn out? Or would the car just sit still as
    the transmission spins the rear yoke that's attached to nothing? Thanks
    for any help you can give me."
     
    TeGGeR®, Oct 11, 2005
    #1
  2. ----------------------------------

    He's have to remove both drive shafts and the propeller shafts. The
    differential could even be removed, to save weight. He might need some
    busted-off outer rear CV joints to hold the rear bearing assemblies
    together and to prevent the ABS from going into cardiac arrest..

    When he sold it, he could say 120,000 on the car, only 50,000 on the
    rear half of the drive train.

    'Curly'
     
    'Curly Q. Links', Oct 11, 2005
    #2
  3. so what are we looking at here for a percentage gain in fuel economy?

     
    T L via CarKB.com, Oct 11, 2005
    #3
  4. ----------------------------

    Fuel mileage gain, maybe 6%.

    Same as leaving mother-in-law at home (but she won't get out and push
    HALF as good as the AWD will) :)

    'Curly'
     
    'Curly Q. Links', Oct 11, 2005
    #4
  5. TeGGeR®

    TeGGeR® Guest



    Curly, see your email.

    What about the yoke on the transmission? If you removed the propeller
    shaft, what would keep the yoke's splines from trying to fall out of the
    gearbox?
     
    TeGGeR®, Oct 11, 2005
    #5
  6. ----------------------------------

    I checked the manual . . The transfer case is like a little
    self-contained manual transmission . . When you unbolt the propeller
    shaft from it, it just sits there and spins it's output at the same
    speed as the front wheel output.. It's not like a CV joint, which is
    held in place with a snap ring. I've heard of guys using an AWD tranny
    to replace a FWD tranny . . They just have a funny extra spinning flange
    on the backside of their (front) differential.

    For the tiny bit of fuel mileage regained, it's a whole lot of trouble
    to do the conversion in question, unless the person never encounters
    snow, mud, or sand anyway.

    'Curly'
     
    'Curly Q. Links', Oct 12, 2005
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.