Accord vs Accura

Discussion in 'Accord' started by aljudy, Jul 31, 2004.

  1. aljudy

    Rob Guest

    I faced the same decision, and went for the 2004 Accord - I even ended
    up going with the 4-cylinder after testing it. I decided against the
    Acura, a lovely car, because I didn't think the additional $10 was
    justified, and also because when I got into the TL, I felt like I was
    in the Accord - the climate control, etc. switches were identical.
    That turned me off. You can't go wrong on this decision, though, IMO!
    Also, I live in MN with about 50" of snow each year, and am
    comfortable with just FWD.
    RPM
     
    Rob, Aug 5, 2004
    #21
  2. aljudy

    aljudy Guest

    I want to thank everyone for your posts. I have bought a 2004 Accord EX with the leather option. I passed on the navigation because I already use a laptop with GPS for a small RV and plan to use it in the new Accord when I need it. I paid just under $22K in Ventura, CA and I felt this was discounted enough to make the '04 worth it rather than wait for the '05. This vehicle replaces a '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee, so it is night and day from this. I decided on the Accord for the price, mileage, reliability, appointments, and less complexity than the Acura... Al
    I am considering buying a 2004 Honda Accord or an Accura. Can someone
    please give me some guidance as to why buy one vs the other besides that
    the Accura is a couple of thousand dollars higher in price. I am leaning towards
    the Accord because it is simpler and has higher mileage. On the other hand the Accura has traction control and stability control, but these features mean more
    complexity. Please give me your thoughts... Al
     
    aljudy, Aug 10, 2004
    #22
  3. aljudy

    JAC Guest

    So go by a Chrysler then. If what you say is true, we should be
    seeing Honda resale values slipping to Chrysler levels. Or better
    yet, today, go try to lease a Chrysler and a Honda of the same cost
    and compare lease payments (due to residual value differences).
     
    JAC, Aug 11, 2004
    #23
  4. aljudy

    Fred Smith Guest

    Congratulations. Did you get four or six cylinder? Manual or automatic?

    Fred
    I want to thank everyone for your posts. I have bought a 2004 Accord EX with the leather option. I passed on the navigation because I already use a laptop with GPS for a small RV and plan to use it in the new Accord when I need it. I paid just under $22K in Ventura, CA and I felt this was discounted enough to make the '04 worth it rather than wait for the '05. This vehicle replaces a '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee, so it is night and day from this. I decided on the Accord for the price, mileage, reliability, appointments, and less complexity than the Acura... Al
    I am considering buying a 2004 Honda Accord or an Accura. Can someone
    please give me some guidance as to why buy one vs the other besides that
    the Accura is a couple of thousand dollars higher in price. I am leaning towards
    the Accord because it is simpler and has higher mileage. On the other hand the Accura has traction control and stability control, but these features mean more
    complexity. Please give me your thoughts... Al
     
    Fred Smith, Aug 14, 2004
    #24
  5. aljudy

    aljudy Guest

    4 cyls and automatic.... Al
    Congratulations. Did you get four or six cylinder? Manual or automatic?

    Fred
    I want to thank everyone for your posts. I have bought a 2004 Accord EX with the leather option. I passed on the navigation because I already use a laptop with GPS for a small RV and plan to use it in the new Accord when I need it. I paid just under $22K in Ventura, CA and I felt this was discounted enough to make the '04 worth it rather than wait for the '05. This vehicle replaces a '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee, so it is night and day from this. I decided on the Accord for the price, mileage, reliability, appointments, and less complexity than the Acura... Al
    I am considering buying a 2004 Honda Accord or an Accura. Can someone
    please give me some guidance as to why buy one vs the other besides that
    the Accura is a couple of thousand dollars higher in price. I am leaning towards
    the Accord because it is simpler and has higher mileage. On the other hand the Accura has traction control and stability control, but these features mean more
    complexity. Please give me your thoughts... Al
     
    aljudy, Aug 14, 2004
    #25
  6. aljudy

    L Alpert Guest

    But they denied the problem for years, even as their dealers were
    putting in 4-5 transmissions a week into those 99 Accords.

    That's Chrysler-level quality.[/QUOTE]

    Poor decision on their part. I would still take them over Chrysler any day.
     
    L Alpert, Aug 18, 2004
    #26
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.