And yet even more on the legendary Honda failing transmissions--Honda won't let you buy a new one on

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 19, 2010.

  1. read the fine print - they're only "certified" for the "window" that's
    left over from the warranty - it doesn't extend beyond the original.
    dealers taking up the slack on what /is/ built in to the design life.[/QUOTE]

    Ah, so they don't do what Honda does.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 23, 2010
    #61
  2. read the fine print - they're only "certified" for the "window" that's
    left over from the warranty - it doesn't extend beyond the original.
    dealers taking up the slack on what /is/ built in to the design life.[/QUOTE]

    Ah, so they don't do what Honda does.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 23, 2010
    #62

  3. If a manufacturer cannot produce an automatic good for at least 150K
    miles, his product is not worth looking at.

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, Aug 24, 2010
    #63

  4. If a manufacturer cannot produce an automatic good for at least 150K
    miles, his product is not worth looking at.

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, Aug 24, 2010
    #64
  5. Elmo P. Shagnasty

    Clive Guest

    Years ago when I used to ride motorbikes (45+) it was said that it's no
    good having a good forth gear, if the rest of the box can't cope. (In
    those days manufacturers used rubbish metal for all the gears except top
    as a cost saving.)
     
    Clive, Aug 24, 2010
    #65
  6. Elmo P. Shagnasty

    Clive Guest

    Years ago when I used to ride motorbikes (45+) it was said that it's no
    good having a good forth gear, if the rest of the box can't cope. (In
    those days manufacturers used rubbish metal for all the gears except top
    as a cost saving.)
     
    Clive, Aug 24, 2010
    #66
  7. Elmo P. Shagnasty

    ACAR Guest

    Can't agree. I've got a LONG list of repairs the car needed not to
    mention the inadequate cooling system when the A/C was working in very
    hot temps. The car was far from bullet proof; although the engine/
    manual trans. required no work over 20+ years. I replaced/repaired CV
    joints, brake calipers (which seized), brake master cylinder, EGR,
    alternator, O2 sensors, radio, headlight switch, master/slave clutch
    cylinders and a whole bunch more. I owned a Toyota Sienna for 12
    years, 250K miles, all overlapping the Legend. The Sienna needed O2
    sensors and a sliding door latch other than routine maintenance items.
    None of the crap that failed on the Legend. Not to mention A/C that
    blew frosty air even on the hottest day.
    Honda brakes still suck.
    True, Honda shitboxes of that era got good mpg but they were flimsy
    and torqueless. My '87 Integra crushed like a soda can when it was
    rear ended on the Washington beltway.
    But so easy and cheap to fix.
    Nope. I had a '66 Chevy that was nearly as reliable as my '98 Sienna.
    It need more repair work but was very reliable over 180K miles.

    So I think you need to look beyond Honda 'cause Honda peaked in the
    early '90s and that has nothing to do with the EPA.
     
    ACAR, Sep 2, 2010
    #67
  8. Elmo P. Shagnasty

    ACAR Guest

    Can't agree. I've got a LONG list of repairs the car needed not to
    mention the inadequate cooling system when the A/C was working in very
    hot temps. The car was far from bullet proof; although the engine/
    manual trans. required no work over 20+ years. I replaced/repaired CV
    joints, brake calipers (which seized), brake master cylinder, EGR,
    alternator, O2 sensors, radio, headlight switch, master/slave clutch
    cylinders and a whole bunch more. I owned a Toyota Sienna for 12
    years, 250K miles, all overlapping the Legend. The Sienna needed O2
    sensors and a sliding door latch other than routine maintenance items.
    None of the crap that failed on the Legend. Not to mention A/C that
    blew frosty air even on the hottest day.
    Honda brakes still suck.
    True, Honda shitboxes of that era got good mpg but they were flimsy
    and torqueless. My '87 Integra crushed like a soda can when it was
    rear ended on the Washington beltway.
    But so easy and cheap to fix.
    Nope. I had a '66 Chevy that was nearly as reliable as my '98 Sienna.
    It need more repair work but was very reliable over 180K miles.

    So I think you need to look beyond Honda 'cause Honda peaked in the
    early '90s and that has nothing to do with the EPA.
     
    ACAR, Sep 2, 2010
    #68
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.