Arco gas?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by piclistguy, Jul 22, 2007.

  1. piclistguy

    jim beam Guest

    you should have bothered to look that up earlier before shooting your
    mouth off.
    rubbish - read the next chapter. the only stretch that matters is that
    between the crank and the cam, the tight side. the rest of it can take
    an excursion back up through the drivers side door column, around the
    trunk and back down the local high street for all it matters to cam timing.
    1, it's not a derivative so any "instant" thing is a red herring.
    2. see above for relevance of the slack side.

    bottom line, don't blow smoke up my kilt steve - i hate seeing grown men
    grovel on their knees.
     
    jim beam, Aug 13, 2007
  2. piclistguy

    Steve Guest

    Draw yourself a picture, you'll eventually see the important difference.
    What matters is where you let the slack ACCUMULATE. You never want
    that on the tension side.
    You really are clueless. It MATTERS which of the chain or belt runs you
    PUT the increasing slack in!! If you don't see why its silly to put the
    accumulated slack in the side that DETERMINES the timing, there's no
    hope in explaining it.
    On cam-in-block engines....
    On OHC engines. Just like I said from day 1.


    So you think the engine custom-built for the INDY RACING LEAGUE,
    contains an engineering decision made on basis of MARKET APPEAL?

    This discussion is over. Its obviously been useless for days, but now
    its over.
     
    Steve, Aug 13, 2007
  3. piclistguy

    jim beam Guest

    dude, you need to go back to school and do basic trig over again.

    let me repeat:
    "if you want to compensate for chain stretch, if you increase the
    length of run by the same degree as the chain stretches. end of story."

    if you read that enough times, and read your engineering books and do
    your trig homework, you might eventually get a clue.
    of course! what part of irl using "production-based, normally-aspirated
    engines" is hard to understand?
    if you'd bothered to get a clue, maybe you wouldn't have been making
    such an ass of yourself.
     
    jim beam, Aug 14, 2007
  4. piclistguy

    Slim Guest

    So he can continue to provide us with a cheaper alternative to lining
    the pockets of
    Bush & Cheney's friends?
     
    Slim, Oct 18, 2007
  5. Since when does Venezuela own Arco?
     
    Scott in SoCal, Oct 18, 2007
  6. piclistguy

    Busman Guest

    Whatever. Citgo is the state-owned oil company of Venezuela not Arco. Arco
    is a subsidiary of BP. They all suck.
     
    Busman, Oct 18, 2007

  7. Ain't CITGO the Chavez brand?

    Besides, oil prices are set by speculators and hysteria.

    Time to invoke some taut Texas rope...

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, Oct 18, 2007
  8. piclistguy

    Steve Sobol Guest

    ["Followup-To:" header set to ca.driving.]
    Venezuela doesn't, the British crown does. BP bought Atlantic Richfield in
    '00.
     
    Steve Sobol, Oct 18, 2007
  9. It's your mind, fool.

    Here's an idea: have someone else fill up the car, but don't tell you
    what's in it.

    You have fooled yourself into believing that "premium gas" equals
    "better" and so you THINK the car "feels slightly better".

    You, sir, are a fuel marketer's dream customer.[/QUOTE]

    I like the way you tell him to perform an objective test and then
    comment as though you, for one, have already made up your mind. Guess
    you didn't notice the contradiction there, ey?

    I actually tried the experiment once. Felt better on premium, though
    admittedly the difference was small and only really noticeable when
    starting to accelerate from a complete stop.



    John
     
    The Man Behind The Curtain, Oct 18, 2007
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.