Are new Hondas maintenance free?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by yahmed, May 13, 2005.

  1. yahmed

    y_p_w Guest

    A chain driving pushrods is fairly short.

    If well maintained, most will probably last the life of a car. If
    poorly maintained, chains can stretch, jump, or otherwise crap out.
    Some of the early Saturns had problems with the oiling pump cover
    and how it distributed oil to their timing chains (TSB 97-T-15A).

    <http://autorepair.about.com/library/faqs/bl811h.htm>

    Chains are often noisier, and GM tried making them less so by using
    nylon coated gear teeth. Eventually the nylon would "shed" and plug
    up oil filters.
     
    y_p_w, May 16, 2005
    #21
  2. Please don't tell the Porsche engineers - they've been racing the flat 6
    which first appeared in 1963, when the 911 was first shown, for years.

    There are few true givens in racing, e.g., for years there was a saying
    "there's no substitute for cubic inches" until Porsche got heavily
    involved in racing the 917 with Penske's crew. Their overwhelming
    success caused the late Mark Donahue, IIRC, to quip "the only substitute
    for cubic inches is cubic money".

    ;)
     
    Sparky Spartacus, May 17, 2005
    #22
  3. True, but a chain only needs to be replaced when you rebuild the engine.
    A chain that lives in a nice clean oil bath will last much longer than a
    timing belt.
    Chains break much less frequently than timing belts. They usually give
    you some sort of warning in advance, by the noise they make.
    Actually it does matter because belts have a shorter life span than a chain.
    Not just theory.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, May 18, 2005
    #23
  4. What manufacturer recommends changing a chain at 60k miles?
     
    Alex Rodriguez, May 18, 2005
    #24
  5. If you change your oil at proper intervals, a chain will live a long time
    with no problem. given a choice, I would take a chain over a belt any
    time.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, May 18, 2005
    #25
  6. yahmed

    Jason Guest

    Alex,
    Which would cause more damage to an engine if it broke while the driver
    was driving 60 miles pers hour--a chain or belt?
    Jason
     
    Jason, May 19, 2005
    #26
  7. yahmed

    SoCalMike Guest

    if both engines are "interference"? theyre both likely screwed regardless.
     
    SoCalMike, May 19, 2005
    #27
  8. About the same. The main thing to consider is that a chain is less likely
    to break.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, May 19, 2005
    #28
  9. yahmed

    magix23 Guest

    What is all the fuss about.
    Why did Honda go for chains on the $ cyl?
    Nissan Altima had and continue to have Timing chains.
    The 3.5 L V6 is a very good engine and it has a timing chain.
    Forget about Nissan.look at these other brands.
    Mercedes Benz, BMW, Jag,Rolls, Bentley, Asthon Martin, also all of the top
    Italian manufacturers use chains on their vehicles.
    Belts are cheaper to manufacture and makes it simpler to work in overhead
    cam engines,
    Chains have proven themselves over time they are stronger. that is why they
    are used on bicycles, motorcycles and CVT trans missions
    Chains are used in the transfer cases of most 4 wheel drive systems.as the
    most reliable transmission medium.
     
    magix23, Jun 20, 2005
    #29
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.