Brakes Bigger rotors or just slotted and or cross drilled?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Beerman182, Jun 23, 2005.

  1. Beerman182

    Beerman182 Guest

    I have a 2003 Honda accord and bgrakes are getting close to be
    replaced, does anyone have any recommendations on either getting bigger
    rotors for the front and rear or just getting slotted or crossed
    drilled?

    The Reason for this is brake life. I initally had my first brakes done
    at 36,000 and now I am at 75,000 and noticing that it is time once
    again for brakes.
     
    Beerman182, Jun 23, 2005
    #1
  2. If you are fortunate enough to have rotors that are not warping and
    you are just having to do brake jobs every 40K or so, I would run out
    the service life on the rotors you have. This turning might do that.

    I got, as an option, a towing package on a Chrysler T&C I have that
    included larger diameter rotors. I have not gotten greater pad life,
    and in fact the rotors warp out about every 25K. first set turned
    once then replaced, second set needs to be turned now. I don't have
    experience with slotted and cross drilled other than knowing they are
    fairly expensive and it seems people who get them upgrade to ceramic
    pads. Makes a brake job cost a bunch.
     
    Frank Boettcher, Jun 23, 2005
    #2
  3. How long were you expecting your brakes to last? The brake pad you use and
    your driving style will influence brake life quite a bit. 75k miles out of a
    brake rotor isn't too bad. Why do you think slotted and/or cross drilled
    rotors will last any longer?
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Jun 23, 2005
    #3
  4. Beerman182

    jim beam Guest

    slotted is marginally better for rain, drilled is marginally better for
    rain [and allegedly a minor heat reduction]. other than that, they do
    nothing for disk life unless the disk material is harder than oem. if
    it /is/ harder, braking efficiency can be compromised and a dangerous
    mis-balance between front & rear can ocurr.

    bottom line, cars like vw, porsche, audi, etc, specify oem pads with
    very high silica content. these pads wear the disks at a much higher
    rate than is typical in japanese cars, and disk replacement with each
    set of pads is not untypical. if you're getting 2 to 3 sets of pads to
    1 disk, you're not in bad shape. if life is too low to each set, either
    you're driving hard, you're driving bad [foot resting on the brake
    pedal] or there's something wrong with the brake system.
     
    jim beam, Jun 24, 2005
    #4
  5. Beerman182

    SoCalMike Guest

    neither. 36k is probably noramal for an AT tranny car. my 98 civic has
    49k miles, and the original pads.
     
    SoCalMike, Jun 24, 2005
    #5
  6. Beerman182

    Beerman182 Guest

    It's an AT, the first time i had the brakes worked on was at 36K, I had
    the rotors turned and new pads. The reason I thought I wanted either a
    larger Diameter or Slotted / Crossed drilled was longer life.

    Since I have returned the rotors(@36K) I have about 40% life on the
    bads up from now and 50% in the rear, I am now at 75k. I live in San
    Diego with many daily trips to LA.

    Another question, can you return slotted / cross drilled rotors? Is
    there any reason cost wise to go that way? If I spend more on the
    Slotted / crossed drilled will there be more life?
     
    Beerman182, Jun 24, 2005
    #6
  7. Beerman182

    jim beam Guest

    bigger rotors can last longer, if you can find them for an accord. but
    the slotted/drilled thing will not make any difference if you're
    skimming the disks on each change. unless the disks are scored, i
    wouldn't touch them.
     
    jim beam, Jun 25, 2005
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.