Can Anything Stop Toyota?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by elmo, Nov 11, 2003.

  1. elmo

    Philip® Guest

    In
    My apologies. I'll be more careful. |^ (
     
    Philip®, Nov 13, 2003
    #61
  2. elmo

    Tegger® Guest


    That's the corn starch that is used to make the plastic less shiny.
     
    Tegger®, Nov 13, 2003
    #62
  3. elmo

    fbloogyudsr Guest

    So, you wanna work on the AWACS plane? When it was delivered
    to the AF in 1978 or so, it's computer was essentially - *AND STILL
    IS TO THIS DAY* essentially an IBM 360 using 1970 tech. If a
    computer went out the techs often went down to Radio Shack for
    a capacitor to fix it.

    I had a manager - this guy had a PhD in Math - that couldn't understand
    that, if a compiler (under development) could do 1+2=2, it could also
    do 2+2=4. We had other managers that believed that assembly code
    was the only way to go to make tight code - they never could believe
    that the *algorithms* and *requirements* dictated the slow system
    response.

    Basically, 10% of us did 90% of the work, because 90% of the people
    there were incapable. Nothing has changed since then - have you
    ever noticed that the Star Wars interceptors still don't work; after
    40 years you'd think they could get it right.

    Floyd
     
    fbloogyudsr, Nov 13, 2003
    #63
  4. elmo

    fbloogyudsr Guest

    So, you wanna work on the AWACS plane? When it was delivered
    to the AF in 1978 or so, it's computer was essentially - *AND STILL
    IS TO THIS DAY* essentially an IBM 360 using 1970 tech. If a
    computer went out the techs often went down to Radio Shack for
    a capacitor to fix it.

    I had a manager - this guy had a PhD in Math - that couldn't understand
    that, if a compiler (under development) could do 1+2=2, it could also
    do 2+2=4. We had other managers that believed that assembly code
    was the only way to go to make tight code - they never could believe
    that the *algorithms* and *requirements* dictated the slow system
    response.

    Basically, 10% of us did 90% of the work, because 90% of the people
    there were incapable. Nothing has changed since then - have you
    ever noticed that the Star Wars interceptors still don't work; after
    40 years you'd think they could get it right.

    Floyd
     
    fbloogyudsr, Nov 13, 2003
    #64
  5. elmo

    Dan J.S. Guest

    But doesn't the US still have the most advanced military equipment in the
    world? I don't ever remember an M1 Abrams break down - I was in desert Storm
    (of course us Marines were still in the good old M60s). The war machine that
    the U.S. has is really high tech. I am just quoting a letter, which put some
    light on this issue. I still agree that for most part, American car industry
    is doing catch up.
     
    Dan J.S., Nov 13, 2003
    #65
  6. elmo

    Dan J.S. Guest

    But doesn't the US still have the most advanced military equipment in the
    world? I don't ever remember an M1 Abrams break down - I was in desert Storm
    (of course us Marines were still in the good old M60s). The war machine that
    the U.S. has is really high tech. I am just quoting a letter, which put some
    light on this issue. I still agree that for most part, American car industry
    is doing catch up.
     
    Dan J.S., Nov 13, 2003
    #66
  7. elmo

    HarrierAWD Guest


    Bigotry only belongs to someone like you. You refuse to face the fact that
    Toyota is making quality automobiles and gaining market share in the U.S.
    Consumer Reports surveys 600,000 auto owners. The result speaks the truth.
    We need to wake up and compete, not to be ignorant like you.

    Just because GM/UAW gave you some kind of "backdoor tours" (I don't wanna
    know) in their plants shouldn't slant your view about GM/UAW quality. Instead
    of touring the useless plants, go to your local library and read the April
    issue of Consumer Reports.
     
    HarrierAWD, Nov 13, 2003
    #67
  8. elmo

    HarrierAWD Guest


    Bigotry only belongs to someone like you. You refuse to face the fact that
    Toyota is making quality automobiles and gaining market share in the U.S.
    Consumer Reports surveys 600,000 auto owners. The result speaks the truth.
    We need to wake up and compete, not to be ignorant like you.

    Just because GM/UAW gave you some kind of "backdoor tours" (I don't wanna
    know) in their plants shouldn't slant your view about GM/UAW quality. Instead
    of touring the useless plants, go to your local library and read the April
    issue of Consumer Reports.
     
    HarrierAWD, Nov 13, 2003
    #68
  9. elmo

    HarrierAWD Guest


    You should be.
     
    HarrierAWD, Nov 13, 2003
    #69
  10. elmo

    HarrierAWD Guest


    You should be.
     
    HarrierAWD, Nov 13, 2003
    #70
  11. elmo

    HarrierAWD Guest

    It's got very low clearance so it's really not designed to go offroad. Its
    gas tank also hangs dangerously low underneath. Hopefully its AWD system will
    do OK on beach sand.
     
    HarrierAWD, Nov 13, 2003
    #71
  12. elmo

    HarrierAWD Guest

    It's got very low clearance so it's really not designed to go offroad. Its
    gas tank also hangs dangerously low underneath. Hopefully its AWD system will
    do OK on beach sand.
     
    HarrierAWD, Nov 13, 2003
    #72
  13. Volvo is just one line of the Ford family of vehicles (including
    Ford, Mercury, Lincoln, Mazda, Jaguar, and Land Rover).
     
    Timothy J. Lee, Nov 13, 2003
    #73
  14. elmo

    fbloogyudsr Guest

    The M1A1 Abrams is probably the best tank in the world. Notice the
    designation? That's because it took about 15 years to get an acceptable
    one built. The engines (gas turbines), the gun, the armor, etc. were all
    re-designed at least once. The tank was first conceived/designed
    around 1970, IIRC.

    The really good thing is that the USSR, Europe and third-world countries
    are worse at building military stuff. For instance, the UK's attempt to
    build the Nimrod AWACS failed utterly at the same time we built
    the E3A. The US's current defense budget is higher than the 10 next-
    biggest defense budgets (or something like that.) The US has spent
    far more than the rest of the world has, and consequently has better
    equipment and men (training is key) than anyone else.

    That *does not* mean that the people in the US's defense industry are
    better than anyone else's. We spend more, you get more (even
    though the Pentagon's beaurocracy appears to be mostly incompetent
    and spends much of it's time on inter-service fights.) There are a
    lot of good people in the US's defense industry; but there are
    many more that are very ordinary or even moronic.

    The main problem I see with the US's auto industry is that they
    have always been too focused on current profits and haven't
    spent enough on R&D and product development. Complacency.

    Floyd
     
    fbloogyudsr, Nov 13, 2003
    #74
  15. elmo

    fbloogyudsr Guest

    The M1A1 Abrams is probably the best tank in the world. Notice the
    designation? That's because it took about 15 years to get an acceptable
    one built. The engines (gas turbines), the gun, the armor, etc. were all
    re-designed at least once. The tank was first conceived/designed
    around 1970, IIRC.

    The really good thing is that the USSR, Europe and third-world countries
    are worse at building military stuff. For instance, the UK's attempt to
    build the Nimrod AWACS failed utterly at the same time we built
    the E3A. The US's current defense budget is higher than the 10 next-
    biggest defense budgets (or something like that.) The US has spent
    far more than the rest of the world has, and consequently has better
    equipment and men (training is key) than anyone else.

    That *does not* mean that the people in the US's defense industry are
    better than anyone else's. We spend more, you get more (even
    though the Pentagon's beaurocracy appears to be mostly incompetent
    and spends much of it's time on inter-service fights.) There are a
    lot of good people in the US's defense industry; but there are
    many more that are very ordinary or even moronic.

    The main problem I see with the US's auto industry is that they
    have always been too focused on current profits and haven't
    spent enough on R&D and product development. Complacency.

    Floyd
     
    fbloogyudsr, Nov 13, 2003
    #75
  16. elmo

    Andrew Guest

    No wonder they're such lemons!

    Andrew
     
    Andrew, Nov 13, 2003
    #76
  17. elmo

    MDT Tech® Guest


    IS, you mean "was"

    --








    SENATOR ZELL MILLER DEMOCRAT OF GEORGIA, the nation's most prominent
    conservative Democrat, said today he will endorse President Bush for
    re-election in 2004 and campaign for him if Bush wishes him to. Miller
    said Bush is "the right man at the right time" to govern the country.

    The next five years "will determine the kind of world my children and
    grandchildren will live in," Miller said in an interview. And he
    wouldn't "trust" any of the nine Democratic presidential candidates with
    governing during "that crucial period," he said. "This Democrat will
    vote for President Bush in 2004."
     
    MDT Tech®, Nov 14, 2003
    #77
  18. elmo

    Philip® Guest

    In
    Oh but if you knew me thru posts on the alt.autos.toyota forum. But
    this particular thread is so crossposted....

    Nobody of experience gives Consumer Reports much credence. They are
    handy ... but not much more. I've seen them print laughable reviews
    while other times they get it close to right. That publication
    should never make up your mind.

    The back door tours I got of GM Southgate back in '78 was when I had
    a part time job picking up special deliveries of parts baskets from
    LAX and running them (often late at night) to the plant. GM
    Southgate at that time was a shoddy place by any standard. It was
    soon closed.

    Take this to the bank, friend .... what you learn in a library is
    only icing on the cake ... after a factory tour, especially an
    unguided tour. I also took an unguided tour of Ford's truck assembly
    plant in Richmond, VA (1989?). Damned JIT delivery. But I didn't
    let that layover time turn into wasted time. :)
     
    Philip®, Nov 14, 2003
    #78
  19. elmo

    Philip® Guest

    In
    Oh but if you knew me thru posts on the alt.autos.toyota forum. But
    this particular thread is so crossposted....

    Nobody of experience gives Consumer Reports much credence. They are
    handy ... but not much more. I've seen them print laughable reviews
    while other times they get it close to right. That publication
    should never make up your mind.

    The back door tours I got of GM Southgate back in '78 was when I had
    a part time job picking up special deliveries of parts baskets from
    LAX and running them (often late at night) to the plant. GM
    Southgate at that time was a shoddy place by any standard. It was
    soon closed.

    Take this to the bank, friend .... what you learn in a library is
    only icing on the cake ... after a factory tour, especially an
    unguided tour. I also took an unguided tour of Ford's truck assembly
    plant in Richmond, VA (1989?). Damned JIT delivery. But I didn't
    let that layover time turn into wasted time. :)
     
    Philip®, Nov 14, 2003
    #79
  20. elmo

    Scott in Fla Guest

    My '92 Corolla interior is as good as new. No cracks.


    Scott in Florida
     
    Scott in Fla, Nov 14, 2003
    #80
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.