Consider buying American!

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by buydomestic, Feb 12, 2008.

  1. buydomestic

    Jeff Guest

    But it's not NEARLY enough of a track record compared to the Japanese
    nameplates--not nearly enough for Joe Sixpack to throw his hard earned
    $25,000.[/QUOTE]

    Funny, the only carmaker to have increased sales last month was GM.

    I guess you don't know Joe.

    Jeff
     
    Jeff, Feb 12, 2008
    #41
  2. buydomestic

    Jeff Guest

    They used to. But, the Michigan 3 also build good cars.
     
    Jeff, Feb 12, 2008
    #42
  3. It's not possible for a country like the US to compete *at all* in the
    world wide economy if you think the workforce wage cost is the only
    important factor. You simply couldn't pay anyone as little as a Chinese
    labourer as they couldn't even afford to buy food at US prices. Or
    accommodation. Etc.
    Thing I've never understood is why the American cars we get in the UK - at
    a far higher price than in the US - have such very poor interiors. Cheap
    plastics etc. After all UK (Euro) Fords and Vauxhalls are ok.
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Feb 12, 2008
    #43
  4. Geez, I some people want everything. Just buy American, fill it with
    $40b Exxon gas, and stop ur whining! Don't you understand that there
    are CEO salaries at stake here?

    On a lighter note, when GM Management gets a friggin clue they might
    be able to make some money. Don't expect it in the foreseeable future.
    They've only made it this far due to inertia.
    I though Vauxhall was a GM brand now (?)
     
    still just me, Feb 13, 2008
    #44
  5. Yes that's the odd thing - Ford and GM actually make some quite good cars in
    Europe these days, and to be fair many EU marques had horrifying reputations
    a generation ago: -

    Citroen - over complex, unrepairable.
    Fiat - rust
    BL - everything
    Skoda - "the worst new cars sold in Britain - Car Magazine"
    etc.
     
    R. Mark Clayton, Feb 13, 2008
    #45
  6. They used to. But, the Michigan 3 also build good cars.[/QUOTE]

    The Michigan 3 have improved.

    So have the Japanese nameplates.

    Jeff, nothing will change simple facts. Your precious Michigan 3
    created sucky products, and are now trying to play in a very mature
    market of good cars.

    When you're Joe Sixpack and plunking down your $25,000...
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Feb 13, 2008
    #46
  7. Funny, the only carmaker to have increased sales last month was GM.

    I guess you don't know Joe.[/QUOTE]

    You keep wanting to focus on things so narrowly, and hope that you can
    convince someone that it's a trend.

    "The only carmaker to have increased sales last month was GM." Last
    month. Show me the last 20 years.

    "I found a lemon Toyota once." Once. Show me the last 200 million
    vehicles. GM, Ford, Chrysler--losers. Japanese nameplates--winners.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Feb 13, 2008
    #47
  8. buydomestic

    buydomestic Guest

    But it's not that way all the way across the board. Not all American
    Cars are unreliable. There are some that are considered as reliable
    as a Honda or Toyota, at least if you're buying new. If you're buying
    used, CR certainly recommends a lot more import models than domestic
    models in their used car section, but they do recommend some domestic
    ones. I would expect that to change a little in the next few years
    though. The Big 3 are still getting beaten badly by Toyota and Honda
    when it comes to reliability, but more new American cars are getting
    the CR reliability mark now than five or six years ago.
     
    buydomestic, Feb 13, 2008
    #48
  9. Whereas the domestic manufacturers don't even have profits.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Feb 13, 2008
    #49
  10. No, No, No.

    A man walks into a car spares shop and asks "Can I get a hub cap for
    my 1995 Lada?" "Sounds like a fair swap," says the chap behind the
    counter.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Feb 13, 2008
    #50
  11. buydomestic

    gfretwell Guest


    I have an 85 F150 Ford in my driveway with 169000 miles on it and a 97
    Honda Prelude with 80000.
    I wouldn't want to try to predict which one will fail first but I do
    know which one is the most expensive to maintain.
    Somebody here told me the other day I wasn't qualified to work on the
    Honda and I should pay $800 for a belt although I am perfectly capable
    of doing anything to the Ford.
    I can't even use common fluids in the Honda. The antifreeze is 4-5
    times as much.
     
    gfretwell, Feb 13, 2008
    #51
  12. It's not the union worker's fault. You could hire a team of Formula 1
    mechanics to disassemble and reassemble a Detroit 3 car and it would
    still be a piece of crap.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Feb 13, 2008
    #52
  13. buydomestic

    Tony Harding Guest

    "One swallow does not a summer make"
     
    Tony Harding, Feb 13, 2008
    #53
  14. buydomestic

    bi241 Guest

    Name a GM, Ford, or Chrysler model from years ago that has an imprint
    on you. Where is it now? Is still being produced? Does it still retain
    its unique characters somehow? I can only think of Chevy Corvette, but
    it's just an expensive toy and has no practical use. Besides, i'd
    rather buy a Honda NSX if i want to have some fun and have money to
    burn..

    And i can never get over the nightmare i used to endure, also known as
    a 1984 Buick Century. A f*cking pain in the ass piece of sh*t

    The truth is that the "Big Three" have no integrity, no characters and
    had not produced anything good enough to hold on to. Why would you
    hold on to them?
     
    bi241, Feb 13, 2008
    #54
  15. Has been for a very long time.

    The point I was making is US cars sold in the UK are priced for the UK
    market - ie about double what they cost in the US. So similar to locally
    produced vehicles. But the quality is very much worse.
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Feb 13, 2008
    #55
  16. Yup. It's nice to have a fall guy though. Saves approaching the real
    problems. Since I'm reading this on a BMW group the OP might like to
    ponder why BMW recognises unions but manages to be one of the most
    profitable car makers world wide.
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Feb 13, 2008
    #56
  17. buydomestic

    Moe Guest

    You can buy detroit iron and pay for present and past autoworkers high
    pay, pension and health care, or you can buy "import" and be able to
    pay for your own health care and provide for your own pension. Same as
    shopping at wal-mart.
     
    Moe, Feb 13, 2008
    #57
  18. buydomestic

    Jeff Guest

    Moe wrote:
    Shopping at Wal-Mart is a different story. Wal-Mart has some really bad
    employee practices, like not paying workers when they work through their
    breaks and a history of locking in workers at night. They are very
    anti-union as well.

    Wal-Mart does predatory pricing on the things they buy. This forces the
    suppliers to cut costs drastically. And on some products, the quality
    really suffers. Plus, the only way some makers can make the products at
    the prices that Wal-Mart demands is to send work out of the country.

    I don't shop there.

    Jeff
     
    Jeff, Feb 13, 2008
    #58
  19. Hey, Jeff:

    http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=gm&btnG=Search+News

    "GM lost $US722 million in the December quarter and a record $US38.7
    billion for 2007"

    Tell us again the bedtime story about how GM was the only automaker
    whose sales improved last month.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Feb 13, 2008
    #59
  20. Nothing unusual about improved sales *and* reduced profits.
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Feb 13, 2008
    #60
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.