CR-V -versus- Rav 4

Discussion in 'CR-V' started by fish, Dec 15, 2005.

  1. fish

    fish Guest

    I will be hoping to buy perhaps sometime next year.

    Currently leaning towards the Rav 4.

    Which is better, the Rav 4 or Honda's CR-V ?

    Consumer Reports rates the CR-V better, but the Rav 4 is actually better,
    according to Consumer Reports.

    That's because CR highly recommends the CR-V even though the Rav 4 is
    better.

    Confused I am.
     
    fish, Dec 15, 2005
    #1
  2. fish

    Oliver Obad Guest

    CRV is bigger inside, has VSA (traction control), airbags all over, rollover
    sensor. Only downside are the tires. THey are noisy and no grip. But most
    OEM tires are garbage and should be replaced ASAP with good rubber, as it
    makes the car.
     
    Oliver Obad, Dec 15, 2005
    #2
  3. fish

    fish Guest

    Oliver Obad sez...
    Right, that's the purpose of an SUV.
    Rollover sensor? What is that?
    Can the vehicle be ordered with better tires when negotiating at the dealer?
     
    fish, Dec 15, 2005
    #3
  4. Did you proofread the above before you hit Send?
     
    Sparky Spartacus, Dec 15, 2005
    #4
  5. fish

    fish Guest

    Sparky Spartacus sez...
    Yes. Both vehicles are very similar in their respective reviews on Consumer
    Reports.

    Both have very similar styles, etc.

    The decision is very difficult since I have no idea if there are any major
    advantages one has over the other.

    The Rav 4 has a better "Reliability History".
    The CR-V is "Highly Recommended, but the Suspension is not rated as good as
    the Rav 4.

    Before I go to the respective showrooms to take a look and a test drive, I
    am seeking more information than Consumer Reports offers.

    I am basically saying that the CR-V is tied with the Rav 4.
    Neither one is better.

    So I ask for advice, thank you.
     
    fish, Dec 15, 2005
    #5
  6. fish

    J Oat Guest

    do not own either one but if both are the same then i would look at the cost
    of replacing wear and tear item between the two like brake timing belt etc.

    most of us do not think about the cost of ownership.

    i am still in disbelieve and shock that domestic vehicle parts are now cost
    much more than japanese brand and sometime even more than germans.

    my local honda list some of the replacement parts comparision and brand like
    hyundai and kia wear and tear item cost more than anyone else.
     
    J Oat, Dec 15, 2005
    #6
  7. fish

    fish Guest

    J Oat sez...
    When I visit the respective showrooms for more research, I will be sure to
    look into that.
     
    fish, Dec 15, 2005
    #7
  8. CR-V and Rav4 both use timing chains.
     
    High Tech Misfit, Dec 15, 2005
    #8
  9. fish

    fish Guest

    High Tech Misfit sez...
    Both are rated very high with Consumer Reports.
     
    fish, Dec 15, 2005
    #9

  10. I'm at that stage also. Have become empty nesters, going to replace
    the wifes minivan and have decided on a CR-V. Evaluated other small
    SUVs. one of the final deciders was the fact that I never,ever see
    them advertised used in my area. They are either kept forever, handed
    down, or sold by word of mouth.

    I think the CR-V has more room and less rollover propensity than the
    Rav 4.
     
    Frank Boettcher, Dec 15, 2005
    #10
  11. fish

    Oliver Obad Guest

    CRV IS BIGGER INSIDE THAN THE RAV4.. better?

    Very few dealers will deal on tires at purchase without putting a premium.
     
    Oliver Obad, Dec 15, 2005
    #11
  12. fish

    fish Guest

    Frank Boettcher sez...
    Which model year are you comparing?

    From Consumer Reports, the 2006 Rav-4 is bigger with a V6 standard.

    I'd like to add that Consumer Reports did not have enough data on the 2006
    Rav 4 to compare.

    I will visit a Honda and Toyota dealer in a few months.
    For now, I am doing as much homework as I can before I listen to those slick
    salesmen.

    I wish to be armed with knowledge and will bring a notepad and pen to take
    allot of notes.

    I will (of course) report back here to this informative newsgroup to share
    what I have learned and to know what further things I need to know.

    When I am ready to buy, I will know just about everything, thus be able to
    ignore any salesman B.S.
     
    fish, Dec 16, 2005
    #12
  13. fish

    fish Guest

    Oliver Obad suggests that.......
    I understand (from Consumer Reports) that the new 2006 Rav 4 is bigger with
    a 3.5 liter V6 standard.
    Am I correct that the CR-V comes with a 2.4 liter 4 as standard?
    Like I said, I am doing my homework, months before I visit a showroom.

    I am thirsty for knowledge. I want to know I am making the right choice,
    like I did 9 years ago with my Saturn (I did research back then and have a
    very reliable car), but I can still dream about driving to Home Depot and
    buying big items that can easily fit in a small SUV than a small car.
     
    fish, Dec 16, 2005
    #13
  14. I saw that in the Edmunds review. Also not much data. If the MPG
    drops as a result of the larger size and the V6, I'm not interested.
    I know Toyota is a good brand and they definitely have a good
    reputation, however, I've owned seven honda products starting with a
    motor bike in the early sixties. never,ever been disappointed. If
    the comparison is a push, they have at least earned my loyalty.
    Good luck!

    Frank
     
    Frank Boettcher, Dec 16, 2005
    #14
  15. fish

    fish Guest

    Frank Boettcher, your contribution to my research is to be commended when
    you said:
    Good to know I'm not the only one doing serious homework here.
    I hear you! We are both thinking the same about the details.
    Wow, that's a big statement!
    I am extra impressed with your views, Frank!
    Trust me, I am as neutral as I can possibly be!
     
    fish, Dec 17, 2005
    #15
  16. fish

    Ron Jones Guest

    The 2006 RAV4 is a totally new vehicle so any past comparison is no longer
    valid. Its base engine is a 166 HP 2.4 L 4-cyl but there is an optional
    3.5L , 269 HP V-6. At 3600 lbs its basically a rocket ... sub 15 sec 1/4
    mile (Car and Driver). I don't know how the (slower) Lexus RX group is going
    to react! The V6 won't be out until January. The 4 cyl comes out Monday.

    BTW the mpg only differs by 1 mpg between the 4 and 6 cyl according to EPA.

    I have been looking at the CRV, Subaru, and RAV4 and decided to hold off
    until I got a look at the new RAV4. When I first heard it was 14" longer I
    was turned off.. I didn't want a big SUV but C and D mag gave it such a good
    review in the last issue I decided to wait and take a closer look.

    rj
     
    Ron Jones, Dec 18, 2005
    #16
  17. fish

    fish Guest

    Ron Jones sez...
    I was right. It takes quite an effort with research because of the constant
    changes in automotive technology.
    Which Subaru model were you researching?
    I ask that you report back to this newsgroup after you have test driven the
    new RAV4. I would certainly be interested in your valued input. I too will
    be taking a test drive, but not before more research.
    I heard it was bigger but 14" seems significant.
    I realize that competition is everything, so it's good to know that they are
    working for our business.
    Some companies expect consumer loyalty without delivering a quality product,
    hence why I am doing thorough research.

    In fact, I am doing much more research than I did 9½ years ago.
    Same here. I am looking for something better than a small car so I can
    actually buy nice things from Home Depot and not worry about trying to fit
    it in my car.

    I will point out a purchase I made last year.

    I bought a huge model of the Empire State Building. I managed to fit it in
    the back seat of my small car.
    This model is huge. The top is attachable. When I got it home and attached
    the top, it is over 50½ inches tall.

    They sell big things in New York.

    Imagine buying a huge Statue of Liberty and not being able to drive it home
    because it does not fit.

    Anyhow, I think you get the point.

    I am not looking for a small SUV for off-road driving.

    I'm looking for storage so I can shop.

    By the way, any SUV that has hideable storage (like a trunk) would be a
    plus.
     
    fish, Dec 18, 2005
    #17
  18. fish

    Oliver Obad Guest

    You should then compared the RAV4 to a Pilot, and not a CRV. As they will
    most likely be priced the same. Both come with 3.5 Litre.

    Anyway, the CRV is going to be redesigned for 2007. So what's new for the
    RAV4 will be old news with the new CRV.Who knows what engine will be in it?
    I would look at the Acura RDX, as the next CRV might share its platform.
    It's coming to showrooms soon.
     
    Oliver Obad, Dec 18, 2005
    #18
  19. fish

    Oliver Obad Guest

    CRV 2007 will be also a new car.. i would hold off until September 2006
    before going either way.
     
    Oliver Obad, Dec 18, 2005
    #19
  20. fish

    SoCalMike Guest

    depends on where it is- wheelbase, overall length, or a combination.
    scion xB. cheap, durable, and a ton of useable storage.
     
    SoCalMike, Dec 19, 2005
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.