Determining oil change intervals via analysis

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by dbltap, Aug 3, 2006.

  1. dbltap

    dbltap Guest

    http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/determining-oil-change-intervals-via-analysis/
     
    dbltap, Aug 3, 2006
    #1
  2. dbltap

    rmac Guest

    Interesting how some people spend $30 for an oil analysis in order to avoid
    a $20 oil change. hmmmm.
     
    rmac, Aug 3, 2006
    #2
  3. dbltap

    Larry in AZ Guest

    What a load of mumbo-jumbo for obsessed people. Hell - just change the oil
    at the recommended intervals and be done with it...
     
    Larry in AZ, Aug 3, 2006
    #3
  4. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Yes, that is the main reason I don't use it for my cars. Now for
    airplanes that use 12 quarts of expensive oil and have serious
    consequences of engine failure or large trucks that may use 6 gallons of
    oil, it makes a lot of sense.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 3, 2006
    #4
  5. Probably the biggest benefit of UOA is that it proves to people that
    oils last much longer than many of them think. With any kind of luck, it
    will convince people once and for all that changing your oil any more
    frequently than the car manufacturer recommends is an unnecessary waste
    of a diminishing resource. Any money saved is a secondary benefit.
     
    Brian Nystrom, Aug 3, 2006
    #5
  6. dbltap

    Stubby Guest

    The oil analysis is to get information on engine wear, not to avoid an
    oil change.
    An airplane engine is more expensive than your car and if wear is
    happening, it needs to be addressed promptly.
     
    Stubby, Aug 3, 2006
    #6
  7. dbltap

    Mike Marlow Guest

    Oh Bunk! Take those sissy pants off Matt and act like a man. Those
    barnstormers of old didn't fiddle about worrying about such things and look
    how exciting they were. Besides everyone knows that if you jump up just
    before the moment of impact...
     
    Mike Marlow, Aug 3, 2006
    #7
  8. dbltap

    Mike Marlow Guest

    Not really. Once the old two seater starts burning oil you simply hire it
    out as a sky writer.
     
    Mike Marlow, Aug 3, 2006
    #8
  9. dbltap

    Guest Guest

    hmmmm.
    Actually, it doesn't prove that at all.
     
    Guest, Aug 3, 2006
    #9
  10. dbltap

    Guest Guest

    And what will you do if the analyis indicates your engine is wearing?
    Rebuild the engine?
    Sue GM?
    or just change the bloody oil?
     
    Guest, Aug 3, 2006
    #10
  11. dbltap

    jim beam Guest

    hey guy, if analysis says your head gasket is about to go or that your
    cam is about to fail, are you going to embark on that 2500 mile road
    trip or are you just going to change the oil and pray? do you have aaa?
     
    jim beam, Aug 3, 2006
    #11
  12. dbltap

    jim beam Guest

    er, actually, yes it does.
     
    jim beam, Aug 3, 2006
    #12
  13. dbltap

    Guest Guest

    If it proves it to you, that is fair enough. What is your background of
    expertise in
    this subject?

    But it doesnt prove it to me.
     
    Guest, Aug 3, 2006
    #13
  14. dbltap

    jim beam Guest

    you're not "avoiding an oil change", you're getting a checkup on the
    health of the engine. chemical content tells you a lot about how the
    motor is running, too hot, too cold, contamination, wear, imminent
    failures, etc. if you could predict whether the motor was going to fail
    in the next 6 months, and you were planning a major road trip, would you
    just go anyway and get the car fixed along the way, or would you get it
    done now while you have the time and resources to do the job properly?
    you don't wait for a plane's engine to fail in flight [if you can avoid
    it!] do you?
     
    jim beam, Aug 3, 2006
    #14
  15. dbltap

    Guest Guest

    The analysis is not really going to tell you your head gasket is 'about' to
    go, or that your camshaft is 'about' to fail.

    And if your cheapo oil analysis gave you an indication of coolant invasion
    or extra wear, do you put enough faith in it that you stop what you are
    doing,
    tear down the engine and rebuild?

    Not likely.

    I maintain my cars regularly and don't waste money on an oil analysis to
    predict how long I might be able to put off an oil change. (FYI,
    I am a professional chemist, and have been for over 40 years.) Chemical
    analysis can be interesting, but it does not necessarily predict, or
    postpone,
    fate.

    I have NEVER had an engine failure nor a transmission failure on the road.

    Admittedly, I don't normally keep a car with much over 150,000 miles
    on it.

    Speaking of failures, I have only had one engine failure in my life, and in
    that case a ring land broke off a piston on a new 428 Cobrajet. This
    failure
    was due to a metallurgical fault in the piston, and not related to
    lubrication
    according to the analysis Ford performed on the part, nor could it have been
    predicted or prevented by your oil analysis.

    The choice is yours, of course, but IMO there is no substitute for regular
    and
    competent maintenance of one's automobile.
     
    Guest, Aug 3, 2006
    #15
  16. dbltap

    Guest Guest

    Are you saying that aircraft turbines are serviced based on oil analysis?
     
    Guest, Aug 3, 2006
    #16
  17. Okay, then...
    Let's say this:

    I can see getting a 'wear test' on an engine at about the third oil
    change.

    Plus a test to see how an oil-brand is doing....

    I'll just spend that last money on another case of Mobil 1, though.


     
    Backyard Mechanic, Aug 3, 2006
    #17
  18. dbltap

    Mike Marlow Guest

    There are a lot of "ifs" in your argument Jim. If those "ifs" were borne
    out by time it might be one thing but they really are not. Regardless of
    what one perceives as the value in the small incremental knowledge or
    insight into the health of their engine, the overwhelming number of vehicles
    on the road today that are simply driven with some sort of traditional oil
    change, and none of the feared problems that you suggest is just far more
    compelling than the limited information from the analysis.

    Simply - that analysis does not, cannot, and does not pretend to predict or
    to even offer the foundation for a prediction that an engine may or may not
    fail in six months. If it were true and one could count on the analysis as
    a predictor, what would you expect to see? Evidence of rings or bearings
    wearing? That could be good - but, at what rate? How much wear is
    tolerable before a catastrophic failure? Is the wear even an indicator of
    pending catastrophic failure? Is the wear an indicator of shortened engine
    life from 200,000 miles to 175,000 miles? Is that even important?

    Of the more common problems which tend to incapacitate a vehicle and which
    one might want to be mindful of when planning a road trip, does the analysis
    predict an alternator failure? A flat tire? A broken belt? A failure in
    the ECM? A failure with the fuel pump? All of these are more than
    significantly more likely to happen and leave you stranded than any engine
    wear that will be made evident by an oil analysis. Cam failures? Do you
    expect a sudden and catastrophic cam failure with no prior warning via the
    performance of the engine? Not likely. If an engine oil analysis suddenly
    makes you aware of an immenent failure in any internal part of your engine,
    that is only evidence that you have totally ignored every other indicator
    that should have been more of an alert to you. The operative part of this
    statement is "immenent"

    Airplane engines do not make a very good argument in this discussion. The
    rigors of an airplane engine's life are so very different from those of a
    car - not to mention the ramifications of any failure, that comparison is
    totally irrelevant. There are a multitude of maintenance practices that
    airplane undergo that are unique to them and have no associated practice in
    the automobile sector. Apples and oranges.

    To each his own as it relates to engine oil analysis, and as has been said -
    it's your money. It's foolish to think though that this analysis is going
    to offer the protection you are suggesting here.
     
    Mike Marlow, Aug 3, 2006
    #18
  19. That's correct. It simply tells you what the state of the oil is--which
    can indicate conditions within the engine.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 3, 2006
    #19
  20. dbltap

    Guest Guest

    Very well spoken, Mike.
     
    Guest, Aug 3, 2006
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.