Determining oil change intervals via analysis

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by dbltap, Aug 3, 2006.

  1. dbltap

    Mike Marlow Guest

    Don't worry about it. This is the internet Jim. If you make a spelling
    mistake someone will surely come along and let you know about it. And of
    course, since it obviously so important, they'll surely offer up the
    suggested proper spelling as well. Just to help out, of course...
     
    Mike Marlow, Aug 5, 2006
    #81
  2. dbltap

    Mike Marlow Guest

    Hey Jim - I'm not ragging on you, but this is the kind of thing that is very
    frustrating in a discussion. Many have talked about long term experiences
    gaining exactly that - a 200,000 mile engine that runs well. When you throw
    a red herring out there about engines that are barely running, it's just a
    noise level in the discussion. A statement like the one above really only
    discredits your position because it not only ignores the evidence of
    experience but it attempts to cloud the discussion with irrelevant clutter.

    I'm kind of hoping you can and do produce something a bit more factual and
    relevant to support your position. Maybe it won't cause me to change my
    habits but it would be worth seeing something factual, if for no other
    reason than the knowledge gain. I don't think you're full of hot air, or
    that your ideas are all wet. Rather, I still don't see the real world value
    they would add to what I already do.

    It may be that I decide there is no sufficient benefit to your ideas and
    that I'll continue with my own practices. That all by itself does not
    discredit what you do or what you support - it only says it doesn't offer
    enough for me. It may also be that if this discussion actually reached a
    level where some sort of empirical evidence was put forth, it might be
    obvious that the incremental value of more frequent changes, oil analysis,
    etc. simply do not offer a statistically significant benefit.
     
    Mike Marlow, Aug 5, 2006
    #82
  3. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest


    http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/sludge/cleaning_sludge.html[/QUOTE]

    Yes, some Toyota engines and one Chrysler engine (the 2.7 as I recall)
    have design errors that cause sludge formation. Frequent oil changes
    have little affect on this, but changing to synthetic helps a lot.

    And something is really fishy with this story. I don't believe the 8700
    miles for a second. Even sludge prone engines won't build this much
    sludge in that little mileage. There is more to this than meets the
    eye. I suspect odometer tampering or possibly even an engine swap with
    a high mileage engine in order to use the new one for anothe vehicle.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #83
  4. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest


    http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/sludge/cleaning_sludge.html
    [/QUOTE]

    I didn't see any failed parts here, just lots of sludge. :)

    And as I already replied, this story just doesn't hold water and isn't
    credible.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #84
  5. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest


    Not if it takes the most expensive part of your car easily from 100K
    miles to 200K miles.

    Of course, since most people switch out cars every 36K miles anymore,
    most people don't think that's important.[/QUOTE]

    Well, my Chrysler minvan was very nearly to 200K on 5,000 and then later
    10,000 mile change intervals using Mobil 1. The inside of the engine
    had only a light coating of varnish when the car was totaled at 178K.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #85
  6. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest


    So you have no homeowner's insurance? No car insurance? After all,
    your house will never burn down and you don't ever plan on getting into
    an accident, therefore you don't need those things.
    [/QUOTE]

    Comparing oil changes to insurance is simply stupid. They aren't
    equivalent at all. You buy insurance to help when crap happens. You
    don't change oil to help when your engine fails. How will an oil change
    give you the money to buy a new engine?

    Changing oil is more analogous to installing a sprinkler system in your
    house. It is to prevent something, not mitigate the damages. And
    changing your oil too often is like installing a sprinkler system in a
    concrete building full of concrete blocks. It doesn't add any
    additional fire protection and is thus a waste of money. Just as is
    changing the oil more often than is necessary.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #86
  7. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Other than being an argument not to buy a Toyota, this site is meaningless.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #87
  8. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest

    They may, but I've seen no documented proof as to when this is
    meaningful. Post some of your fleet testing results. If my engine will
    last 200K with 10,000 miles intervals and the body rusts off at 200K,
    what is the point of reducing engine wear?

    And why not change oil at 1,000 miles rather than 3,000 as that would
    reduce wear even more right? How about 500 miles? Why not change it
    every morning before going to work?


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #88
  9. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Trust me I have. That isn't data. Obviously, you have no data.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #89
  10. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I think your cut and paste keys are stuck. This is meaningless and you
    can't even figure that out. This isn't a test and doesn't show anything
    related to the topic at hand. It shows a failed engine with unknown
    history. If you think that is data, then you have much to learn.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #90
  11. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Yes, and then learn about relevance.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #91
  12. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest

    My minvan ran as good as new at 178,000 miles, used the same amount of
    oil as it did when I got it and had basically the same MPG (I compute
    every single tank and keep it in a log book).

    Next...


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #92
  13. dbltap

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Mike, as you and I know, there is no credible scientific data out there
    either for or against any given oil change frequency. The closest I've
    seen to a real-world test is the one that CR did many years ago with a
    taxi fleet. They found no measurable wear in engines changed at 6,000
    miles (if memory serves) running plain old dino oil.

    Now, there were several shortcomings in their test, in my opinion, such
    as taxis don't really represent how most people drive as they rarely get
    thermally cycled and there is reason to believe that cold starts are
    one of the highest wear activities an engine sees. And, again if memory
    serves, they ran the engines for only 60,000 miles. This is hardly a
    stress test for a modern engine.

    However, imperfect as it was, this is about the only test I've seen that
    was even close to scientifically conducted.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 5, 2006
    #93
  14. dbltap

    Elle Guest

    You are not addressing his point about taking the car to
    only 200k miles.

    Just the way you reason is a tipoff that you're bs-ing.
    Again.

    As usual, you get all huffy and insist you know it all,
    without producing any data. You need to learn that there is
    a gray area; that opinions do not make facts.

    Tribology indeed. I'd tell you to read about it, but that's
    just a waste, because you couldn't reason your way out of
    the proverbial wet paper bag.

    Consumer Reports study is the best I've seen so far. It's
    not perfect, but I haven't seen any other with any kind of
    controls. See the article at
    http://www.xs11.com/stories/croil96.htm

    And no, Beamer, that does not mean it settles this debate.
    But it is evidence on the side of not changing one's oil
    every 3k miles under normal driving conditions.

    Try try not to see things as black and white when they
    clearly are not.

    Try try not to read things into others' statements, in a
    poor effort to build your weak ego.
    Watch him rationalize this one.
     
    Elle, Aug 5, 2006
    #94
  15. dbltap

    Jim Warman Guest

    Oooohhh, you get the "Miss Congeniality" award.... you can rest assured your
    reply has enamored you for life....

    FWIW, nothing replaces regular, timely oil changes (along with the "usual"
    but often overlooked inspection process involved) as a preventive service
    measure. If an oil analysis reveals higher than normal levels of tin, is the
    owner going to rush into an expensive rebearing job? I doubt it.

    However, some users of oil analysis services find this valuable.... these
    sorts of fleet operations use the analysis to identify incipient concerns
    and feel justified in spending the money before there is a very expensive
    "inconvenience" or possible environmental damage.

    For the average motorist, the oil analysis will benefit only one entity...
    usually, the testing lab.

    I started driving in the mid-60s and have never needed this sort of service
    for any other reason than to prove that a consumer has done something
    wrong.... (hmmm... can we spell "backfire"?).

    BTW, you are still a spammy bastuhd....
     
    Jim Warman, Aug 5, 2006
    #95

  16. Not if it takes the most expensive part of your car easily from 100K
    miles to 200K miles.[/QUOTE]

    What evidence do you have that it makes that difference? None, I
    suspect, since none exists. I've owned three vehicles that went over
    165K miles and all of them ran fine. Their oil was changed every
    5000-7000 miles. They were all put to rest for reasons other than engine
    problems (body rot, broken transmission, etc.)
     
    Brian Nystrom, Aug 5, 2006
    #96
  17. Because the benefits go on a curve.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 5, 2006
    #97
  18. In your world, maybe.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 5, 2006
    #98
  19. And when you run your car like a taxi, 24/7 with the engine on, those
    tests will be relevant to you.

    If you drive your car like a stay at home mom, a couple miles here and
    there with the engine never getting warm, that would create different
    results.

    Did CR test those kinds of conditions?

    You can't extrapolate the CR taxi test into the normal world where cars
    aren't run like taxis.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 5, 2006
    #99
  20. I think your cut and paste keys are stuck. This is meaningless and you
    can't even figure that out.[/QUOTE]

    You asked someone to show you something that could break inside the
    engine due to insufficient oil changes. From that page: "If the owner
    had left it long enough, the pickup would eventually have choked on the
    sludge, causing oil starvation and engine seizure."
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 5, 2006
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.