Disabling ABS

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by joe, Jan 12, 2006.

  1. joe

    Professor Guest

    I'm just glad you guys aren't designing my car!... LOL

    Professor
    www.telstar-electronics.com
     
    Professor, Jan 15, 2006
    #21
  2. joe

    jim beam Guest

    technically, that's not quite correct, but the conditions under which
    abs outperforms a skilled driver are fairly narrow in scope and require
    the abs to "know" the difference between tires, road conditions, etc.
    all current abs systems "know" [afaik] is whether the wheel is locked or
    not, and that's "dumb".
    my experience with abs is that it's actually a very good idea on garbage
    slush boxes like buicks. for cars like that, the suspension is so soft,
    that sudden application of the brakes is initially taken up in the
    "slush" of suspension travel, not road resistance, and the wheel can
    almost instantaneously lock. as there's almost no driver feedback, the
    driver doesn't know what's going on until the whole car is starting to
    break loose - not good. and in this situation, i think the compromise
    that is abs is on balance a good idea. with a honda otoh, it's light,
    tight, and the driver can instantly feel what's going on, /way/ before
    the car brakes loose. the suspension is /not/ sloppy, so the "instant
    lock" phenomenon is not a feature of daily driving. in this case, i
    think abs is an option, and something i personally declined when i
    bought a new civic back in 2000.
     
    jim beam, Jan 15, 2006
    #22
  3. joe

    jim beam Guest

    don't you think it a high risk strategy to call yourself "professor" if
    you don't know what you're talking about? and worse, don't know when to
    not /prove/ you don't know what you're talking about?
     
    jim beam, Jan 15, 2006
    #23
  4. joe

    jerri Guest

    You are absolutely correct. I have seen this demonstrated at two
    performance driving schools I attented. After the instructors finished
    the demonstration, the students got a chance to try it. It made me a
    believer. I'm sure I'll get replies saying I don't know what I'm
    talking about and the instructors didn't either. I'll give my response
    ahead of time. Spend a few days and a little money and go to a
    school taught by professional drivers. You will be amazed at what you
    will learn.
     
    jerri, Jan 17, 2006
    #24
  5. joe

    jim beam Guest

    the place for abs is on slush buckets where the driver has no feedback
    on what's happening with the wheels, trucks where the driver has no
    feedback on what's happening with the wheels, locomotives where the
    driver has no feedback on what's happening with the wheels, planes
    where... get the idea?

    for a light & tight vehicle like a honda [this /is/ a honda group,
    right?] it's only necessary if the driver can't/won't/doesn't threshold
    brake.

    braking distance is a function of energy absorbed. abs chops up the
    absorption curve into chunks as it goes above and below threshold
    repeatedly. the abs can't moderate the degree of pressure to achieve
    threshold, nor can it hold it at threshold. all it can do is sense
    whether the wheel is locked, release, and so on. each time it releases,
    it passes threshold, each time it releases, it passes threshold. this
    may be fine in reasonable friction conditions where the braking effect
    between each release is considerable and the total energy absorbed
    quickly accumulates, but in low friction conditions, this can introduce
    considerable time delay into the energy absorption equation. try
    stopping quickly in snow with abs and see where it gets you.
     
    jim beam, Jan 18, 2006
    #25
  6. joe

    jerri Guest


    My prediction was correct. I knew it would be. IRMC. BTW: Your "Shift
    Key" isn't working. PLONK! You won't stir my pot again.
     
    jerri, Jan 18, 2006
    #26
  7. joe

    jim beam Guest

    a worthy technical analysis. thanks for contributing to the knowledge
    pool by sharing your expertise.
     
    jim beam, Jan 19, 2006
    #27
  8. joe

    flobert Guest

    Actually, its properly called Cadence braking
     
    flobert, Jan 20, 2006
    #28
  9. joe

    Sean D Guest

    If you'd bothered to google both terms you'd know that they are both equally
    accepted terms for basically the same technique.
     
    Sean D, Jan 21, 2006
    #29
  10. joe

    jim beam Guest

    not really. cadence, like abs, is where you pass /through/ the
    threshold of adhesion, lock and have to release. threshold is where you
    brake /at/ the adhesion limit, but don't pass through it.
     
    jim beam, Jan 21, 2006
    #30
  11. joe

    Sean D Guest

    So cadence braking is "pumping" the brake where you lock and unlock, whereas
    threshold is where you constantly apply the max pressure without locking to
    get the most out of the brakes, right? The technique I learned was
    threshold braking, where you hit the brakes hard, when you feel the wheel
    starting to lock, release the slightest amount of pressure to prevent
    locking, then gradually apply more pressure to brake as you slow down,
    always staying on the verge of locking. As I said earlier, a properly
    performed threshold brake will outperform ABS because there is no release in
    brake pressure. I still use threshold braking on my car. ABS just prevents
    locking if I accidentally apply too much pressure. It's a safeguard, but I
    don't depend in it.

    P.S. My apologies to the poster I responsed to earlier. My response was
    snotty. I'd just gotten off work and was in a rotten mood.

     
    Sean D, Jan 21, 2006
    #31
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.