disabling drls

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Drew, Feb 15, 2006.

  1. Drew

    BE Guest

    http://www.lightsout.org/

    http://www.motorists.org/stealthis/drls.html
     
    BE, Feb 18, 2006
    #21
  2. Drew

    Matt Ion Guest

    If you want to look "normal", leave them alone - in Canada, all new cars
    since the early 90s have been required to have DRLs. I believe the US
    has similar laws. With them, your car is about as "normal" as any other
    '06. Accord or otherwise.
    On what? They're only on when the engine is running, so they're not
    draining the battery. At worst you're losing a fraction of one
    horsepower. Adjusting your power seats is a bigger drain.
    You should check local vehicle regs. In some jurisdictions, disabling
    them may be illegal, and may result in fines and/or inspection notices.
     
    Matt Ion, Feb 19, 2006
    #22
  3. Drew

    Matt Ion Guest

    Most operate at reduced brightness. On our '96 Grand Voyager, the front
    signal lights are turned on for DRLs, at a whopping 10W or so each.
    It's REALLY not that big a draw.
    Yeah, might cost you 0.01mpg. Oooo.
     
    Matt Ion, Feb 19, 2006
    #23
  4. You mean you want to be allowed to think for yourself? Many idiots in
    positions of power can't understand that.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Feb 19, 2006
    #24
  5. Drew

    BE Guest

    Nope, GM just manufacturers all wiring harnesses for North America in
    Canada.
     
    BE, Feb 19, 2006
    #25
  6. Drew

    Matt Ion Guest

    The point remains: if your new Accord came with DRLs, then so did
    everyone else's, so if looking "normal" is a concern, leave them alone.
     
    Matt Ion, Feb 19, 2006
    #26
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.