Enable DRL on 2005 US Spec CR-V?

Discussion in 'CR-V' started by RWM, Oct 20, 2004.

  1. RWM

    RWM Guest

    For the Highway Loss Data Institute's ** actual ** position on DRLs,
    see: http://www.iihs.org/safety_facts/qanda/drl.htm

    Numerous insurance companies offer discounts for their use... Think
    about it.
     
    RWM, Oct 28, 2004
    #81
  2. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    That's a crock!
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 28, 2004
    #82
  3. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    That's a crock!
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 28, 2004
    #83
  4. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    The opposite has been proven in other countries in the world to be true.
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 28, 2004
    #84
  5. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    The opposite has been proven in other countries in the world to be true.
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 28, 2004
    #85
  6. Read the part about reducing light out put to European levels. Also it
    seems that only GM is stupid enough to use high beams as DRL's. Another
    really stupid idea that is not addressed. The only folks in the US pushing
    for DRL's is GM. DRL's also do nothing that a smart driver can't do on
    their own. DRL's that use high beams do bother other motorists on the road.
    And as I mentioned before, it will cause a lot of stupid drivers to drive
    around at night without turning on their lights, which means they are blacked
    out to the rear, because they thinkg DRL's are ok to drive with at night.
    The IIHS is biased. They are fully funded by insurance companies, so all
    their data always supports what is in the insurance companies best interest.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Oct 28, 2004
    #86
  7. Read the part about reducing light out put to European levels. Also it
    seems that only GM is stupid enough to use high beams as DRL's. Another
    really stupid idea that is not addressed. The only folks in the US pushing
    for DRL's is GM. DRL's also do nothing that a smart driver can't do on
    their own. DRL's that use high beams do bother other motorists on the road.
    And as I mentioned before, it will cause a lot of stupid drivers to drive
    around at night without turning on their lights, which means they are blacked
    out to the rear, because they thinkg DRL's are ok to drive with at night.
    The IIHS is biased. They are fully funded by insurance companies, so all
    their data always supports what is in the insurance companies best interest.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Oct 28, 2004
    #87
  8. Other countries have smarter implementations of DRL's.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Oct 28, 2004
    #88
  9. Other countries have smarter implementations of DRL's.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Oct 28, 2004
    #89
  10. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    Honda uses the high beam lights (at reduced wattage) for their DRLs.
    road.

    Not true.
    Nothing is going to help stupid drivers {;^)
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 28, 2004
    #90
  11. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    Honda uses the high beam lights (at reduced wattage) for their DRLs.
    road.

    Not true.
    Nothing is going to help stupid drivers {;^)
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 28, 2004
    #91
  12. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    In what way?

    --
    Brian

    Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have
    come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance
    to the first.
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 28, 2004
    #92
  13. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    In what way?

    --
    Brian

    Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have
    come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance
    to the first.
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 28, 2004
    #93
  14. RWM

    mwh Guest

    Here's my 2 cents.

    I haven't really looked at the accident numbers but doesn't it make sense
    that an increase in daytime lights would detract from the visibility of
    motorcycles and hence be responsible for more motorcycle accidents? It used
    to be when you saw lights during the day, it was either a motorcycle (or I
    guess a drunk driver). Now with all the lights on everyone just blends in
    with the crowd making motorcycles more hidden.

    Mike H
     
    mwh, Oct 28, 2004
    #94
  15. RWM

    mwh Guest

    Here's my 2 cents.

    I haven't really looked at the accident numbers but doesn't it make sense
    that an increase in daytime lights would detract from the visibility of
    motorcycles and hence be responsible for more motorcycle accidents? It used
    to be when you saw lights during the day, it was either a motorcycle (or I
    guess a drunk driver). Now with all the lights on everyone just blends in
    with the crowd making motorcycles more hidden.

    Mike H
     
    mwh, Oct 28, 2004
    #95
  16. RWM

    me Guest

    How on earth would DRL's make a bus more obvious to other drivers on the
    road? Are you telling me that DRL's make it easier to see a huge bus? It
    was proven that there was no reduction in accidents based on using DRL's. I
    also find it true that it's harder to see someone's front turn signal
    flashing when they have DRL's from a distance. The white light is brighter
    than the small flashing turn signal. Just because insurance companies give
    you a discount, doesn't mean that they are safer. Do you normally believe
    everything your insurance company tells you?

    On a side note, I can understand using them if it will save you money, but I
    don't want to hear people preach about DRL's making a car safer.
     
    me, Oct 29, 2004
    #96
  17. RWM

    me Guest

    How on earth would DRL's make a bus more obvious to other drivers on the
    road? Are you telling me that DRL's make it easier to see a huge bus? It
    was proven that there was no reduction in accidents based on using DRL's. I
    also find it true that it's harder to see someone's front turn signal
    flashing when they have DRL's from a distance. The white light is brighter
    than the small flashing turn signal. Just because insurance companies give
    you a discount, doesn't mean that they are safer. Do you normally believe
    everything your insurance company tells you?

    On a side note, I can understand using them if it will save you money, but I
    don't want to hear people preach about DRL's making a car safer.
     
    me, Oct 29, 2004
    #97
  18. RWM

    me Guest

    It's a good thing you backed up your statements with facts. Thanks for
    setting that website straight. You obviously provided some wonderful
    sources for your insightful input.

    Keep up the good work.
     
    me, Oct 29, 2004
    #98
  19. RWM

    me Guest

    It's a good thing you backed up your statements with facts. Thanks for
    setting that website straight. You obviously provided some wonderful
    sources for your insightful input.

    Keep up the good work.
     
    me, Oct 29, 2004
    #99
  20. RWM

    Brian Smith Guest

    I should have said that you're a crock, I guess {;^)

    I have read many things over the years about DRLs and none of them were on
    the Internet. You might try a Library it's the old fashioned (but effective
    way) of doing research. That and the fact that, I was brought up being told
    if you want something, do it yourself.
     
    Brian Smith, Oct 29, 2004
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.