Figuring Out How Much a Hybrid, Diesel, or Small Car Will Save Per Year

I would if I could.

I've spent quite a few hours in the cockpit of a C-130 BTW.[/QUOTE]

And did the nice pilot man pin plastic wings on you?

 

Um...your Google skills leave a bit to be desired.

US military involvement in Cambodia in 1970 is a matter of
(very accessible) historical record.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_Campaign

 

Um...your Google skills leave a bit to be desired.

US military involvement in Cambodia in 1970 is a matter of
(very accessible) historical record.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_Campaign

 

Michelle was in Army intellegence, she would know would'nt she? I would
think. Maybe.....

Sort of like John Kerry's trip up the Mekong, LOL.

 

Michelle was in Army intellegence, she would know would'nt she? I would
think. Maybe.....

Sort of like John Kerry's trip up the Mekong, LOL.

 

In message Tegger sprach forth
the following:

Heheheheh. Looks like plonking Ms. Stoner is already paying dividends.

 

In message Tegger sprach forth
the following:

Heheheheh. Looks like plonking Ms. Stoner is already paying dividends.

 

All the items you list as needing fixes require LESS government
meddling, not more. And not just "different" meddling either, but
actually LESS. None, ideally.

Government should be outright prohibited from meddling in almost any
area of human life. Hey, I sound just like Thomas Jefferson, an American
hero of long standing.

The Democrats want far, far more meddling than the US has ever seen
since, oh, since the first election won by Bush II, or maybe since LBJ,
or maybe since FDR, or maybe since Wilson. All of whom were disastrous
executives, highly destructive of the American dream.

Indeed the current crop of Dems seem to be drooling, gasping,
masturbating, absolutely slavering over the prospect of wielding ever
more POWER. Just look at Pelosi's current insane attack against an
empire that died 85 years ago.

Any "train wrecks" suffered by the US have been directly caused by the
fact that government legislators, regulators and bureaucrats can do
whatever they or their lobbyist puppetmasters want, without any sort of
repercussions at all.

Would I vote for Ron Paul? No. He's a statist conservative, not a
Jeffersonian liberal. And he is most certainly no "libertarian", even as
he lays claim to that label.

Ron Paul wants government control of *this* type, but not *that* type.
He seems to think this makes him obviously different from your general
type of statist who wants government control of *that* type but not
*this* type. Ron, get a clue.

Would I vote Democrat? No. They are statist socialists in all but name,
and are as dangerous as are all true-believer statists who want, very
very desperately, to force their views on other people, under penalty of
law.

Government is the problem, not the solution. So said Jefferson 200 years
ago, and so it is still true.

 

All the items you list as needing fixes require LESS government
meddling, not more. And not just "different" meddling either, but
actually LESS. None, ideally.

Government should be outright prohibited from meddling in almost any
area of human life. Hey, I sound just like Thomas Jefferson, an American
hero of long standing.

The Democrats want far, far more meddling than the US has ever seen
since, oh, since the first election won by Bush II, or maybe since LBJ,
or maybe since FDR, or maybe since Wilson. All of whom were disastrous
executives, highly destructive of the American dream.

Indeed the current crop of Dems seem to be drooling, gasping,
masturbating, absolutely slavering over the prospect of wielding ever
more POWER. Just look at Pelosi's current insane attack against an
empire that died 85 years ago.

Any "train wrecks" suffered by the US have been directly caused by the
fact that government legislators, regulators and bureaucrats can do
whatever they or their lobbyist puppetmasters want, without any sort of
repercussions at all.

Would I vote for Ron Paul? No. He's a statist conservative, not a
Jeffersonian liberal. And he is most certainly no "libertarian", even as
he lays claim to that label.

Ron Paul wants government control of *this* type, but not *that* type.
He seems to think this makes him obviously different from your general
type of statist who wants government control of *that* type but not
*this* type. Ron, get a clue.

Would I vote Democrat? No. They are statist socialists in all but name,
and are as dangerous as are all true-believer statists who want, very
very desperately, to force their views on other people, under penalty of
law.

Government is the problem, not the solution. So said Jefferson 200 years
ago, and so it is still true.

 

alt.autos.toyota.prius
alt.autos.toyota
alt.autos.honda
rec.autos.makers.honda
alt.energy.automobile

Looks like there are four good candidates.

Bob Wilson

 

alt.autos.toyota.prius
alt.autos.toyota
alt.autos.honda
rec.autos.makers.honda
alt.energy.automobile

Looks like there are four good candidates.

Bob Wilson

 

In message dbu.
sprach forth the following:

Yeah, the kind of "intelligence" that said Saddam had WMDs.

 

In message dbu.
sprach forth the following:

Yeah, the kind of "intelligence" that said Saddam had WMDs.

 

In message Tegger sprach forth
the following:

Yeah, how dare the United States meddle in the internal affairs of other
nations...

 

In message Tegger sprach forth
the following:

Yeah, how dare the United States meddle in the internal affairs of other
nations...

 

In message Tegger sprach forth
the following:

I'm sure you're ready to back that claim up with documented citations,
right?

 

In message Tegger sprach forth
the following:

I'm sure you're ready to back that claim up with documented citations,
right?

 

Spin it anyway you want.

Your sheeple attitude (and knowledge) reveal you for what you are... Not
credible.

JT

 

Spin it anyway you want.

Your sheeple attitude (and knowledge) reveal you for what you are... Not
credible.

JT

 

get out of here.. You are a smoker like the jsb/larrymoe circle jerk.