Figuring Out How Much a Hybrid, Diesel, or Small Car Will Save Per Year

get out of here.. You are a smoker like the jsb/larrymoe circle jerk.

 

You have Google, right? Dig it up yourself. Or are you just trying to pick
a fight?

 

You have Google, right? Dig it up yourself. Or are you just trying to pick
a fight?

 

Yes. How can the United States meddle in the affairs of the Ottoman Empire?

Please tell me how they can do this in 2007, when the Ottoman Empire
imploded and shattered in 1915?

 

Yes. How can the United States meddle in the affairs of the Ottoman Empire?

Please tell me how they can do this in 2007, when the Ottoman Empire
imploded and shattered in 1915?

 

In message Tegger sprach
forth the following:

You made a claim. A false claim. I called you on it. Put up or shut up.

Ron Paul is in no way, shape or form a "statist"; neither does he want
"government control of this type or that type".

 

In message Tegger sprach
forth the following:

You made a claim. A false claim. I called you on it. Put up or shut up.

Ron Paul is in no way, shape or form a "statist"; neither does he want
"government control of this type or that type".

 

In message Tegger sprach
forth the following:

Uh, I was referring sarcastically to Iraq.

 

In message Tegger sprach
forth the following:

Uh, I was referring sarcastically to Iraq.

 

What does Ron Paul want to do about illegal Mexican immigration?

 

What does Ron Paul want to do about illegal Mexican immigration?

 

In message Tegger sprach forth
the following:

Look at his website:

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/border-security-and-immigration-reform/

The talk must stop. We must secure our borders now. A nation without secure
borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad
when our own front door is left unlocked. This is my six point plan:

* Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it
takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated
immigration reform proposals.
* Enforce visa rules. Immigration officials must track visa holders
and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law.
This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11
terrorists had expired visas.
* No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in
our country illegally. That’s a lot of people to reward for breaking our
laws.
* No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants
who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules. But taxpayers
should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools,
roads, and social services.
* End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their
children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S.
illegally will remain strong.
* Pass true immigration reform. The current system is incoherent and
unfair. But current reform proposals would allow up to 60 million more
immigrants into our country, according to the Heritage Foundation. This is
insanity. Legal immigrants from all countries should face the same rules
and waiting periods.

 

In message Tegger sprach forth
the following:

Look at his website:

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/border-security-and-immigration-reform/

The talk must stop. We must secure our borders now. A nation without secure
borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad
when our own front door is left unlocked. This is my six point plan:

* Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it
takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated
immigration reform proposals.
* Enforce visa rules. Immigration officials must track visa holders
and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law.
This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11
terrorists had expired visas.
* No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in
our country illegally. That’s a lot of people to reward for breaking our
laws.
* No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants
who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules. But taxpayers
should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools,
roads, and social services.
* End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their
children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S.
illegally will remain strong.
* Pass true immigration reform. The current system is incoherent and
unfair. But current reform proposals would allow up to 60 million more
immigrants into our country, according to the Heritage Foundation. This is
insanity. Legal immigrants from all countries should face the same rules
and waiting periods.

 

Before you go off half-cocked, Google Teddy Kennedy's Immigration Act of
1965.

Wonder why you now have a problem with those little brown people? Blame the
the drunken Democrat from Massachusetts.

 

Before you go off half-cocked, Google Teddy Kennedy's Immigration Act of
1965.

Wonder why you now have a problem with those little brown people? Blame the
the drunken Democrat from Massachusetts.

 

In message Tegger sprach
forth the following:

Been there done that.

You're forgetting the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA)? Alan
Simpson? Romano Mazzoli? Ronald Reagan? Ring a bell?

 

In message Tegger sprach
forth the following:

Been there done that.

You're forgetting the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA)? Alan
Simpson? Romano Mazzoli? Ronald Reagan? Ring a bell?

 

All the items you list as needing fixes require LESS government
meddling, not more. And not just "different" meddling either, but
actually LESS. None, ideally.[/QUOTE]

"No Child Left Behind" is government meddling. The anti-choice policies
is government meddling. "Don't Ask Don't Tell" is government meddling.
Laws preventing gays from adopting children or marrying each other is
government meddling. The Democrats will reduce government meddling in
all those areas.

Health care is a different kettle of fish, though; the mess we're in is
the result of HMOs and other health insurance companies. No government
action will let them run rampant and make the situation even worse.
Capitalism is a great institution, and is probably the best economic
system there is; however, unrestrained capitalism is just as bad as
total government control.

I totally agree with those two paragraphs.

And for the same reason I won't vote Republican; they are more statist
than the Democrats. And I won't vote Libertarian because the
Libertarian party today is composed of right wingers who have fled the
religious right's takeover of the GOP. So, of all the options, the
Democrats are the least odious to me.

 

All the items you list as needing fixes require LESS government
meddling, not more. And not just "different" meddling either, but
actually LESS. None, ideally.[/QUOTE]

"No Child Left Behind" is government meddling. The anti-choice policies
is government meddling. "Don't Ask Don't Tell" is government meddling.
Laws preventing gays from adopting children or marrying each other is
government meddling. The Democrats will reduce government meddling in
all those areas.

Health care is a different kettle of fish, though; the mess we're in is
the result of HMOs and other health insurance companies. No government
action will let them run rampant and make the situation even worse.
Capitalism is a great institution, and is probably the best economic
system there is; however, unrestrained capitalism is just as bad as
total government control.

I totally agree with those two paragraphs.

And for the same reason I won't vote Republican; they are more statist
than the Democrats. And I won't vote Libertarian because the
Libertarian party today is composed of right wingers who have fled the
religious right's takeover of the GOP. So, of all the options, the
Democrats are the least odious to me.

 

Um...your Google skills leave a bit to be desired.

US military involvement in Cambodia in 1970 is a matter of (very
accessible) historical record.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_Campaign[/QUOTE]

Attacking VC and NVA forces in Cambodia is not the same as being in
Cambodia like we were in Vietnam and are in Iraq.

I suggest a reading-comprehension course for you.