Gas Tank Level Theory

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Elle, Jan 12, 2006.

  1. Elle

    Elle Guest

    I agree, so far.
    accuse it.

    I think we're having a miscommunication. What I'm
    challenging here is whether the gage reads more
    proportionally to the actual weight of fuel in the tank in
    the winter rather than summer. E.g. in winter, I get about
    220 miles by the time the gage indicates half-full. In
    summer, by contrast, I get about 270 miles.

    Roughly.
    Right.

    It's not something I'm losing sleep over. Just something
    that might be worth mentioning when people come here
    complaining that their fuel gage doesn't read in much
    proportion to the fuel in the tank.
     
    Elle, Jan 13, 2006
    #41
  2. Elle

    Elle Guest

    Not in my neck of the woods.

    In some parts of the country, yes, there is a significant
    difference in gasoline "blends."
    mileage.

    Oy.

    We're having a miscommunication.
    average.

    That's exactly what I do.
     
    Elle, Jan 13, 2006
    #42
  3. Elle

    Elle Guest

    Not in my neck of the woods.

    In some parts of the country, yes, there is a significant
    difference in gasoline "blends."
    mileage.

    Oy.

    We're having a miscommunication.
    average.

    That's exactly what I do.
     
    Elle, Jan 13, 2006
    #43
  4. Elle

    SoCalMike Guest

    thats what i do, too. i also knew on my last trip to laughlin that i can
    usually make it there on a tank of gas.

    almost all the way there, gauge is reading low. trip odometer says
    something like 285 miles. 11.9 gal tank, i usually get 32mpg. (380 to
    a tank?)
     
    SoCalMike, Jan 13, 2006
    #44
  5. Elle

    SoCalMike Guest

    thats what i do, too. i also knew on my last trip to laughlin that i can
    usually make it there on a tank of gas.

    almost all the way there, gauge is reading low. trip odometer says
    something like 285 miles. 11.9 gal tank, i usually get 32mpg. (380 to
    a tank?)
     
    SoCalMike, Jan 13, 2006
    #45
  6. Elle

    Larry J. Guest

    Waiving the right to remain silent, SoCalMike
    So, how many gallons did you use for 285 miles..?
     
    Larry J., Jan 13, 2006
    #46
  7. Elle

    Larry J. Guest

    Waiving the right to remain silent, SoCalMike
    So, how many gallons did you use for 285 miles..?
     
    Larry J., Jan 13, 2006
    #47
  8. Elle

    Remco Guest

    Exactly - that's the interesting part.
     
    Remco, Jan 13, 2006
    #48
  9. Elle

    Remco Guest

    Exactly - that's the interesting part.
     
    Remco, Jan 13, 2006
    #49
  10. Elle

    SoCalMike Guest

    i ferget. turned out to be something like 25mpg. incredibly low, but
    thats running close to 100 at times, with the A/C, and in 3rd or 4th
    gear. definate mileage killers!
     
    SoCalMike, Jan 14, 2006
    #50
  11. Elle

    SoCalMike Guest

    i ferget. turned out to be something like 25mpg. incredibly low, but
    thats running close to 100 at times, with the A/C, and in 3rd or 4th
    gear. definate mileage killers!
     
    SoCalMike, Jan 14, 2006
    #51
  12. Elle

    TE Cheah Guest

    | Still great mileage
    Impossible w-o changing your exhaust*manifold & spark cables.

    Honda fits only short branch ( 4 into 1 pipe ), cheap & heavy cast iron
    * for its engines <2.2 litre, even a F22A's *'s twin pipes are short.
    Result is lower though adequate torque @ low rpm ( as during
    buyers' test drives ), but very low ( <½ as much ) torque & mpg @ high
    ( >3000 ) rpm, this inadequacy expands with rpm.
    http://circletrack.com/techarticles/73598
    In 6-02 I saw a new Civic vtec 1.6 litre engine with very short * : a waste
    of vtec ( no way is torque / mpg esp @ high rpm maximised ).
    www.turborick.com/gsxr1127/gasoline.html para 10.2(1) indicates how
    bad a civic's * is. Many car makers ( incl Nissan in Sunny 130Y, Hyundai
    in Sonata 2.4, Proton in Waja 1.8 ) save on *, because 99.99% buyers
    don't test drive on highways, or know / experienced a difference between
    short & long branch *.
    My F20A had crude carbon-core cables made by Sumitomo, efficiency
    was low ( even by 1990 std ) : longest cable has 12.7k ohm, this is why
    honda prescribes just 1mm plug gaps.
    www.magnecor.com/magnecor1/truth.htm I've changed my F20A's spark
    cables 4x, present set ( German cables ) has just 0.2 ohm/ ft : when
    warm & w-o load, my F20A can idle @ just 600 rpm, with load ( gear &
    brake engaged ) then 550 rpm ( without shaking / stalling ). Plug gaps are
    2mm. All these are impossible with crude carbon-core cables, this is
    why honda prescribes 770±50 i.e. minimum 720rpm. How low can your
    original spec engine ( with crude carbon-core cables ) likewise idle @ ?
    Carbon can absorb RFI, but cannot conduct as well as metal : high
    efficiency cables makers coil metal wires around carbon cores, then use
    these coiled wires to conduct : spark size Ø expands from ½ to 3 mm,
    10x brighter, colour turns fr deep to bright blue, 5x as loud.( in open air ).
    @ high rpm, any engine ( incl yours ) with 1 small coil & crude carbon-
    core cables will have very small sparks, low torque & loud exhaust noise,
    this inadequacy expands with rpm.
     
    TE Cheah, Jan 14, 2006
    #52
  13. Elle

    TE Cheah Guest

    | Still great mileage
    Impossible w-o changing your exhaust*manifold & spark cables.

    Honda fits only short branch ( 4 into 1 pipe ), cheap & heavy cast iron
    * for its engines <2.2 litre, even a F22A's *'s twin pipes are short.
    Result is lower though adequate torque @ low rpm ( as during
    buyers' test drives ), but very low ( <½ as much ) torque & mpg @ high
    ( >3000 ) rpm, this inadequacy expands with rpm.
    http://circletrack.com/techarticles/73598
    In 6-02 I saw a new Civic vtec 1.6 litre engine with very short * : a waste
    of vtec ( no way is torque / mpg esp @ high rpm maximised ).
    www.turborick.com/gsxr1127/gasoline.html para 10.2(1) indicates how
    bad a civic's * is. Many car makers ( incl Nissan in Sunny 130Y, Hyundai
    in Sonata 2.4, Proton in Waja 1.8 ) save on *, because 99.99% buyers
    don't test drive on highways, or know / experienced a difference between
    short & long branch *.
    My F20A had crude carbon-core cables made by Sumitomo, efficiency
    was low ( even by 1990 std ) : longest cable has 12.7k ohm, this is why
    honda prescribes just 1mm plug gaps.
    www.magnecor.com/magnecor1/truth.htm I've changed my F20A's spark
    cables 4x, present set ( German cables ) has just 0.2 ohm/ ft : when
    warm & w-o load, my F20A can idle @ just 600 rpm, with load ( gear &
    brake engaged ) then 550 rpm ( without shaking / stalling ). Plug gaps are
    2mm. All these are impossible with crude carbon-core cables, this is
    why honda prescribes 770±50 i.e. minimum 720rpm. How low can your
    original spec engine ( with crude carbon-core cables ) likewise idle @ ?
    Carbon can absorb RFI, but cannot conduct as well as metal : high
    efficiency cables makers coil metal wires around carbon cores, then use
    these coiled wires to conduct : spark size Ø expands from ½ to 3 mm,
    10x brighter, colour turns fr deep to bright blue, 5x as loud.( in open air ).
    @ high rpm, any engine ( incl yours ) with 1 small coil & crude carbon-
    core cables will have very small sparks, low torque & loud exhaust noise,
    this inadequacy expands with rpm.
     
    TE Cheah, Jan 14, 2006
    #53
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.