In another car, the springs wouldn't have made much of an impact, but on the 00 Hatch, I think the stock's were too slow/soft to capitalize on the wishbone bone setup (the bad springs were too slow and couldn't get the wishbone suspension to push-out the wheels fast enought when corning, which would mess up the left/right transition). The Pro-Kit springs I had installed on my 98 Hatch were progressive and only dropped the car by an inch (so, my ground clearance was on par with most stock car). Also, the progression on the springs was nicely done, so I still got the stock ride. When I sold 98 Hatch at 300,000km, the Tockico shocks had 270,000km on them, but the car's handling was still within about 5% of perfection. I realy think it's the springs and not the shocks that was the bigger factor. And once you got the right springs, the swaybars become unnecessary (specificaly for the wishbone setup on 00 Civic Hatch, I doubt it's the same case for the other models). Pars [QUOTE="jim"] [QUOTE="pars"] I had my 6'5 brother-in-law in the 07 Yaris last night. He didn't seem too big for the car, but I wonder about his view of the road, since his eye level is somewhat close to the top edge of the windshield. Also, the steering wheel ins't telescopic, so if you're 6'5 and have alot of legs, it could be problem.[/QUOTE] the 89's not over-endowed in the leg dept, but it's ok. a crx is /much/ better, as in, i have to stretch for the pedals!!! a really novel experience for me! but about 1" less headroom though. [QUOTE] Regarding the 00 Civic, the hatch didn't have any swaybars, while the coupe/sedan only had one up front and the Si(R) had both of them. I totally agree with you, regarding the bad left/right transition which prompted me to improve the cars handling, after an extremely scary epsiode on the highway back in 1999. I was going to add swaybars, but after I installed the Tockico Shocks and Eibach Pro-Kit springs, and combined with the 7" wide rims, left/right stability was no-longer an issue. Which was cool, because the swaybars would have messed-up the car bad-weather capabilities (since they mount right onto the control arms).[/QUOTE] i put the si sway bars on my 00, and it handled much better, especially with bilstein shocks. can't say i noticed any problems in bad weather. i know a lot of the circuit racer gang all swear against sway bars in the wet, but they all use super-rigid [20mm+] rears which i just don't understand. i know they're trying to eliminate understeer, but i don't get the logic of trying to corner on 3 wheels when 4 are available. there's nothing wrong with understeer if you know what you're doing. again, i say adhesion with 4 on the ground is better than 3, and any stiff rear sway bar worshiper is going to have to have a /really/ good argument to persuade me otherwise. [QUOTE] I then added 3 strutbars and the top-rear was ideal, giving enough rigidity to the rear to let in come out when it needed to. If you get your hands on a 98 or 00 Civic Hatch, I highly recommed the above modifications. The only car that I drove, that came close to same level of handling capability, was my friends 2000 Celica GTS which sported TRD springs. Also, with the suspension add-ons on the 00 Hatch, the driving charateristics becomes more like that of the 89 (more nimble and better road feel). However, the 00 structure is strong enought to take the abuse without throwing off the alignment or balance (after 270,000km...I never had to give the car an alignment and handling at the extreme was always predictable).[/QUOTE] glad you dialed it in how you like it. personally, i think my stock 89 handled better than my modded 00, and my modded 00 was /way/ better than it was stock! i tried si shocks, [slightly better than stock hatch shocks - good on freeways], kyb agx's, [good when "landing", but a little harsh on freeways] and bilsteins [floaty, but they made the car corner well], but there was still something lacking. maybe i should have tried tokico's but i was through with messing by the time i sold it. the fact that my 89 could dust it was really the last straw. that's the hazard of having more than one car at a time - comparisons are /real/, not ignorable on the basis of "maybe i'm not remembering it right". at the time all this was going on, i had 4 to compare:, 89, 91 & 00 civic hatches, and a 91 crx. crx easily handled the best of the lot. [QUOTE] Anyways, all the work I put into modifying my old 98 Hatch is now someone elses babe. The 07 Yaris will have some big shoes to fill. Pars [QUOTE="jim"] pars wrote: jim beam wrote: pars wrote: The old 98 Civic I just sold had no rust. I was considering dropping in a newer engine and transmission, replace the entire exhust system, replace old emission parts, replace the old shocks/springs, re-do the tint, put in RSX seats, get uncle to re-upholster the interior with leather, order a new carpet and get uncle to install, replace the cracked front bumper, re-paint car and fix dings. Since I knew the right people, I probable could have got all that done for about ,000. Only thing is, I still wouldn't have Air Condition and I couldn't rely on the the car to be trouble free when compared to a new one off the assemble line. So, I took the easy way out and simply bought a new car and put my racing genes on hold. i hear you. i did that for a while, but have come back to the 89 civic because i was just so bored. as an aside, last i looked, the a/c kit for the 96 was just under 00. Pars you know, i did the math on this. unless you need to impress someone with the interior of your car, the 30k or so you'd spend buying a pre-built "sports car", you can buy a used california [rust free] civic, some really hot mods and have yourself a real rocket - one that handles well. depends on taste i guess. Your might be right. If I remeber correctly, I believe you're an old-timer with a lot history with Autos which I can respect. I've owned 7 Automobiles (3 of them being brand new) and I think the 98 Civic Hatch will probably leave the most lasting impression. But at moment, I'm just having too much fun with the 07 5drs Yaris. I've done 700km on the odo (in only a few days) and it's steadly becoming more endearing. It can't behave like the old Civic Hatch at the extremes, but it's such a precise quality piece of machinary, it can't help but put a smile on my face. It's nimble like a the Civic and is prefectly setup for my 6'2 frame. My view of the road is spot on. Pars good to know about that yaris. i'm 6'5" and there's not many cars have sufficient headroom, [including hondas with sun/moon roofs] so the height accommodation is worth my checking out. i can see my 89 hatch being kept as the "fun" weekend car, with a more modern daily driver to take care of the boring stuff. i used to have a 00 civic, but never really liked it. it still had wishbones and therefore handled comparatively well compared to a lot of mcpherson stuff, but compared to the 89, it was both slower [even "broken in" at 50k miles] and noticeably heavier which was bad for handling. you also had to go ex or si to get sway bars too, something even the basic 88-91's have as standard. honda just "heavied" the body up on that model without examining all the handling dynamics, and in the absence of sway bars, it made rapid transitions from one lean to the other quite alarming. maybe they /wanted/ to make it a duffer because all subsequent work across their product range has been geared towards "paying for performance", but even so, the 00 was a pale shadow of its predecessors. the only thing the 00 really did well was manage the automatic transmission better. prior to the 99's, full power gear shift was transitioned by the torque converter. in the 99 and up, it's assisted by "throttling back" the motor, [in this case, retarding ignition timing so engine output drops substantially], so shifting was a lot smoother, and i suspect, transmissions would last longer, but other than that, the whole vehicle bored me silly. /hated/ the seats compared to the 89. maybe i'll put a late model v-tec motor in the 89 some day with this updated transmission control, but the re-wiring will be non-trivial. definitely "back burner"![/QUOTE] [/QUOTE][/QUOTE]