Honda/Toyota vs American

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by D.D. Palmer, Apr 27, 2005.

  1. D.D. Palmer

    D.D. Palmer Guest

    Just an observation. Most people think a Taurus or Buick Century are
    comparable to Camrys or Accords, but in reality one is a 100,000 vehicle and
    one is a 150,000 vehicle and the market prices them that way.
     
    D.D. Palmer, Apr 29, 2005
    #21
  2. D.D. Palmer

    Jim Yanik Guest

    (Jason) wrote in
    Only because our own companies would not respond to competition;in
    fact,they lobbied for protection from competition.

    (and the same thing happened with the VCR;Japan developed it when US
    companies would not,and the profits went to Japan,deservedly.)
    And Chrysler
    This I agree with.
     
    Jim Yanik, Apr 29, 2005
    #22
  3. D.D. Palmer

    Jim Yanik Guest

    I would say the market VALUES the cars that way,not "prices",that is what
    the manufacturers do;price their products.Then they must offer "incentives"
    and price games to actually move their product.
    The market(consumers) are the ones who decide what product is worth the
    asking price.

    Note that for some Japanese models,the American consumers were paying MORE
    than the list price due to demand and desirability of certain models.And
    still being put on waiting lists!!
     
    Jim Yanik, Apr 29, 2005
    #23
  4. And Fiat - like Chrysler, an automaker based in Europe.
     
    Jack Hamilton, Apr 30, 2005
    #24
  5. D.D. Palmer

    Dave Kelsen Guest

    Exactly.

    Except that unlike Fiat, Chrysler is not an automaker based in Europe.
    The parent corporation is based in Europe. But Chrysler is no more
    based in Europe than Mercedes is based in California.


    RFT!!!
    Dave Kelsen
     
    Dave Kelsen, Apr 30, 2005
    #25
  6. D.D. Palmer

    Ron M. Guest

    GM has seemingly done a good job with the Cobalt from both an interior and
    exterior appearance standpoint. Pricing is right too. However, there's
    nothing more frightening in the automotive industry than a first-year GM
    product. Regardless of whether it is a sedan, pickup truck or SUV. Cobalt
    does have loads of potential though. The doors shut with the sound of the
    late 80s Mercedes-Benz products. Solid as can be. Overall, you can tell that
    GM has tried really, really hard with the Cobalt. It *should* be a winner
    for them if it doesn't have too many introductory year bugs that scare
    people off for subsequent year purchases. I would even consider a Cobalt
    myself as a daily commuter car after it has been in production for three
    full years. It has plenty of room in it, should be good on fuel economy,
    looks decent enough if cosmetics are your thing, and can be well equipped if
    you're willing to spring for the LT package. I have my eye on this one as a
    fourth vehicle to be used mainly for commuting back and forth to work. It
    definitely won't be a replacement for my 2002 Lexus IS300. I will always
    have more confidence in the overall reliability of my Lexus, Honda and
    Nissan products than I would a second or third year domestic. Wouldn't
    matter to me if it were a GM, Ford OR Daimler-Chrysler product.

    Ron M.
     
    Ron M., May 7, 2005
    #26
  7. D.D. Palmer

    Jason Guest

    Ron,
    After driving a Lexus for several years, you will learn to really hate
    driving the Cobalt. I own a 99 Accord EX. I recently had to rent a small
    car that had almost none of the features that are in my 99 Accord. It did
    not even have a CD player. I was really glad when I was able to return it
    and start driving my Accord. You will probably feel the same way everytime
    you get back in your Lexus. The Cobalt will probably run very well for two
    or three years and at that point--things will start breaking down. I hope
    that I am wrong--but don't be surprised if it happened to the Cobalt.
    Jason
     
    Jason, May 7, 2005
    #27
  8. D.D. Palmer

    Ron M. Guest

    Hi Jason,

    Thanks for the response--and I understand where you're coming from here.
    Sometimes it's tough getting back into my 1990 Nissan 300ZX and driving
    it after having driven my IS300 for a few days straight. You're right in
    that
    you do get spoiled to an upgraded vehicle. :) I was hoping that maybe a
    well-equipped Cobalt wouldn't be such an extreme letdown from the IS300,
    but maybe it would be. I'd have to take a Cobalt on a long, long, LONG test
    drive before purchasing one for a work commuter. The General hasn't gotten
    my money yet. :) At this point it's nothing more than a thought.

    Take care and have a great weekend.\

    Ron M.
     
    Ron M., May 7, 2005
    #28
  9. D.D. Palmer

    Jason Guest

    If you do decide to get a Cobalt instead of Honda, make sure that it has
    the most powerful engine that comes in a Cobalt. The small car that I
    rented had a really small engine (1.5). It ran really well in the city but
    when I went up a grade, I had to hold the gas pedal to the floor just to
    keep up with the traffic. I never have had to that with my Honda Accord.
    Jason
     
    Jason, May 8, 2005
    #29
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.