Hybrids

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Bob, May 19, 2005.

  1. Bob

    John Horner Guest

    Count me as a hybrid skeptic right now. Most people seem to be
    reporting real world fuel economy much lower than the EPA published numbers.

    Long term running costs including battery replacements, controller
    problems, etc. are all still to be seen.

    Fuel economy wise, diesel engines make vastly more sense than do complex
    hybrid powertrains.

    John
     
    John Horner, May 22, 2005
    #21
  2. Bob

    John Horner Guest

    The problem as I see it is that hybrids flunk the basic keep it simple
    principle. They have far more components than their conventional
    counterparts and weigh more as well. More complexity and more weight.
    Not good general starting point to achieve better efficiency.

    Many of the hybrid vehicles are also using other tricks to get some of
    the fuel economy, which tricks do not require the hybrid powertrain.
    Smaller engines as you mentioned are one trick. Narrow, high pressure
    tires are another trick. Cylinder deactivation is another (as used on
    the V-6 hybrid Accord).

    Marketing and hype are clouding many of the facts.

    John
     
    John Horner, May 22, 2005
    #22
  3. Bob

    John Horner Guest

    The main advantage a hybrid has is it's ability to recapture some of the
    energy which would otherwise be lost to heat by conventional braking.
    On the open road this is a non-issue.

    The second potential advantage of a hybrid is that the gasoline powered
    engine can be shut down when the car is stopped and the stored energy in
    the batteries can be used to keep the A/C, radio and other systems alive.

    The biggest disadvantage a hybrid has is that it is heavier than the
    same vehicle without the added batteries and electics. The work done in
    moving and object from one point to another is a function of the
    distance and the weights (ok, mass). All other things being equal, a
    heavier vehicle gets lower fuel economy than a lighter one.

    Oddly enough, GM may have the idea more "right" in their limited
    production pickup truck hybrid system where the electrics are small and
    light and really only have anough capacity to enable the shut down of
    the gasoline engine at a dead stop.

    John
     
    John Horner, May 22, 2005
    #23
  4. Smaller engines are not a trick but a consequence of hybridization. One of
    the driving philosophies of hybridization is that it is ludicrous to use a
    240 hp engine to move a 5 passenger car around town. Hybrid powertrains make
    it practical to downsize the engine, since the limiting factor then is the
    power required for freeway hill climbing - the electrics determine the
    acceleration performance. Again, I'll grant the current crop of hybrids
    don't go very far in fulfilling that promise but even the older Prius (like
    mine) is far more responsive in town than the 75 hp engine would suggest.

    No modern car "keeps it simple" but you might consider the tradeoff. The
    Prius powertrain is complex in concept but not in practice. Actually, any
    automatic transmission is vastly more complex than the hybrid transaxle.
    Honda autoboxes are a good example. They have a controller; the hybrid
    system has a controller. The hybrid system has an inverter; the Honda does
    not. The hybrid transaxle has a fixed planetary power split device and two
    motor/generators; the Honda box has an automatic transaxle with lockup
    torque converter, multiple gear sets, pumps, valves, solenoids, and
    clutches. The Toyota hybrid system has a main battery, a 12V aux battery and
    a voltage converter; the Honda has a starter, alternator, regulator, and
    belts. If the Toyota hybrid has cruise control there are switches; if the
    Honda has cruise control there is a cruise control module, switches and
    vacuum motor.

    Reliability has seemed to favor the Toyota hybrid system over conventional
    systems in several areas. There are two known cases of hybrid transaxle
    failure and unconfirmed rumors of as many as 3 more among the 11000+ members
    in the Yahoo Prius group over the past 4 years; compare that to the number
    of automatic transmission problems that show up here. The same Yahoo Prius
    group has frequent complaints about failure of the undersized 12 volt aux
    battery, comparable to the number of complaints here about alternator
    problems (but a whole lot easier to fix). There are a modest number of
    starter questions here (like "why did my aftermarket rebuilt starter fail
    the next week" and "how do I get the darned thing out") while the Toyota
    system has no starter.

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, May 22, 2005
    #24
  5. Bob

    Jim Yanik Guest

    Which only are 'used' when power is lost.
    They are "stand-by" batteries used in UPS (uninterruptable power supplies)
    systems.

    Batteries used for hybrid autos are -always- in use.
     
    Jim Yanik, May 22, 2005
    #25
  6. Bob

    Jason Guest

    Yes, I agree that it's no surprise at all for those of us that truly
    understand Hybrid vehicles. However, the vast majority of people that buy
    or plan to buy Hybrid vehicles do NOT understand Hybrid vehicles. I've see
    at least a dozen posts in this and other car related newsgroups from
    Hybrid owners that were shocked when their miles per gallon were much less
    than they expected it to be. In almost all of these cases, those people
    were making use of their Hybrid cars to do lots of freeway and interstate
    driving. It's obvious that the salesmen that sold them the Hybrid cars did
    NOT tell them about these factors.
    My memory is not perfect but I seem to recall that the car mentioned in
    the above post was a Toyota Prius.
     
    Jason, May 22, 2005
    #26
  7. Bob

    Jason Guest

    Hello,
    I have a question for you. Do you know whether or not Toyota and Honda
    informed people in the brochures related to their Hybrid vehicles about
    the true nature of Hybrid vehicles? For example, do they (in their
    brochures) warn people that if they plan to use their Hybrid vehicles
    mainly on interstates and freeways that the miles per gallon will not be
    very good?

    I have seen several posts from Hybrid owners indicating that they were
    shocked to learn that they only get great gas mileage (aka miles per
    gallon) when they do lots of city driving. The makers of Hybrid vehicles
    should inform people about the nature of Hybrid vehicles before they buy
    them. I hope that they do it but don't really know since I have not read
    the brochures.
    Jason
     
    Jason, May 22, 2005
    #27
  8. Bob

    Matt Ion Guest

    Rechargeable batteries are an odd creature. I have a little Milwaukee
    power screwdriver (like the ol' Black & Decker "PowerDriver", but an
    actual pro-duty tool) that came with two 2.4V NiCads, which have long
    been notorious for short life, voltage fall-off and "memory effect".
    The first battery I had to replace after *EIGHT YEARS* of regular use,
    when it wouldn't take a charge anymore. The second finally gave out
    three years later... or at least came close to giving out, before I
    replaced it anyway. 15 years after I bought it, that driver is the best
    $200 I ever spent.

    Meanwhile, I've owned two IBM ThinkPad laptops, both using more modern,
    supposedly more robust Lithium Ion battery packs. Both started showing
    a marked decline in charge life after less than a year, to the point
    that they wouldn't hold a charge at all after less than two years. I've
    seen similar with several other LiIon laptop batteries as well. At
    $200-$300 or more each, they're a pricy investment.
     
    Matt Ion, May 23, 2005
    #28
  9. What do you consider "not very good'?
     
    Steve Bigelow, May 23, 2005
    #29
  10. Bob

    Jim Yanik Guest



    NiCds are "use it or lose it" type of batteries.If you use
    infrequently,they do not hold up as well as if you use and recharge them
    often.
    Also,using a "fast" smart charger (1 hour or less charge time)goves a
    longer battery life.
     
    Jim Yanik, May 23, 2005
    #30
  11. Bob

    David Guest

    Here in Tucson, we've had good mileage with our Civic Hybrid. In cool-season
    city driving, we really do get 45-48 miles per gallon (those are our
    calculations--the car's computer display inflates mileage by about 3 mpg),
    with the CVT. In summer, we probably lose about 3 miles per gallon, thanks
    to the A/C, and whether we have to force the engine to run to keep the cool
    air blowing at traffic lights (when it's 110 degrees outside).

    Freeway driving gives around 36-42--speed limit is 75; real-world practice
    is closer to 80. Mileage is somewhat better on two-lane roads where the
    limit is 65. I've noticed a bigger hit on this car from using A/C than on
    other cars we've had. I'm not complaining; the vast majority of our driving
    is city driving, and that is this car's strength. It's very enjoyable to get
    close to 600 miles on a tank of gas.

    David
     
    David, May 23, 2005
    #31
  12. Bob

    K`Tetch Guest

    ACtually, that depends very much on the model of the cell, and its
    condition. There are ways to condition cells, but i don't reccomend
    them to those unskilled, but it basically involves zapping the cells,
    to break down the crystal biuldup 9conductive crystals form, which
    produce a 'shotened' battery, hence the memory effect.

    Condition them right, charge them, look after them, and they'll always
    do you good, right to the end of their design life, and often beyond.
     
    K`Tetch, May 23, 2005
    #32
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.