intermittent wiper problem - 88-91 civic

Discussion in 'Civic' started by jim beam, Dec 30, 2005.

  1. jim beam

    jim beam Guest

    anyone have experience of reliability issues with the i.c.u., the
    integrated control unit that controls, among other things, intermittent
    wiper operation? mine is being extremely temperamental - sometimes the
    intermittent wipers work, sometimes not. other wiper operations are
    fine. other icm operations are fine.

    * i've replaced the switch - no difference.
    * i've re-soldered the module - no difference.

    the only other thing it could be is the wiring, but that tests ok.

    i googled the archive and found a post from someone recommending
    replacing all the icm capacitors, and i can do that, but visual
    inspection shows no evidence of leakage. and it wouldn't explain how it
    works some days, not others.

    any thoughts/experience fixing this problem much appreciated!
     
    jim beam, Dec 30, 2005
    #1
  2. jim beam

    Graham W Guest

    When the intermittent fails, does it fail to activate the motor or
    is there no delay and the wipers run as if switched 'on'?

    Capacitors usually fail 'open' and so offer no delay to the circuit.
     
    Graham W, Dec 30, 2005
    #2
  3. jim beam

    jim beam Guest

    no delay. it wipes once, then it's done. that did make me think of
    capacitors, and it's why i asked here! if capacitors fail open, then
    the problem accords with what you describe. assuming the timer chip is
    something like a 555, it's a simple rc circuit, with the "c" never
    cycling. from what you're saying graham, i think it's time to hit the
    electronics store! many thanks dude - much appreciated!
     
    jim beam, Dec 31, 2005
    #3
  4. jim beam

    Graham W Guest

    I'm not convinced that I understand what you expect and what the fault
    causes it to do!

    If the 'C' goes towards O/C (open circuit) then it won't delay the trigger
    voltage from reaching the threshold IYSWIM and the delay won't be
    be very long. But you say it it does cycle once. Is that what it now does
    or is that what it *should* do? An O/C cap would be continuously causing
    the the timer to fire and so appear to 'run' the motor as if switched
    'on'.

    Sorry to be thick but I'm not yet convinced we've got pinned.

    It sounds more like the timer doesn't re-cycle to set off the next sweep.
    Is that right? (It always fires once but doesn't repeat?) The cap is
    likely
    to be polarised so take note of its polarity markings when you swap it
    out.
     
    Graham W, Dec 31, 2005
    #4
  5. jim beam

    SoCalMike Guest

    last time i had something funky going on with my electrics, it was a bad
    fuse. might be worth yanking em all and reseating em.
     
    SoCalMike, Dec 31, 2005
    #5
  6. jim beam

    jim beam Guest

    well, whatever the mechanism, it seems to have worked. i didn't replace
    all the caps, just the 4 largest, [pushed for time] and now, it has a
    consistent wipe delay of about 3 seconds - before it was a bit variable
    [when it was working] of 4 - 6 seconds. i'll get in there again in a
    few more weekends and finish the job.

    kinda makes me wonder about the long term reliability of the ecu though.
    i know honda ecus are legendarily reliable and i'm pretty sure the
    componentry in there is sealed with a conformal coating. the delay unit
    is not. would that make the difference? would it help with the delay
    unit? i can seal it when i have it out again.
     
    jim beam, Jan 1, 2006
    #6
  7. jim beam

    Graham W Guest

    That's good to hear, Jim. (Sorry to read you got a smack in the face
    from that socket in ypour other thread.)
    Large value caps have a fairly wide value tolerance like +30%/-15%
    so the delay will be down to that, I guess.
    Do you know what type they are? Round can foil or tantalum bead?
    The latter will be more stable but also cost more.
    I'd think the manufacturing standards for the ECU are far better than
    the delay unit. This includes part specifications and inspection.
    It could help if there is surface leakage across the PCB traces which
    steal from or add to the current charging the capacitor but I don't think
    it would be worth doing. The timing difference you note is almost
    certainly the new value being smaller than the old one (when working).

    However, it would be worth getting a few snaps of the board and showing
    what you replaced with details of their type/voltage/microFarads to put
    up a web page about it (pass it to John, maybe?)

    Now, kindly look at my other post about water in the footwell!

    Happy New Year everyone.
     
    Graham W, Jan 1, 2006
    #7
  8. jim beam

    jim beam Guest

    round can electrolytics.

    1 x 100μF, 16V
    1 x 47μF, 50V
    2 x 33μF, 33V
    1 x 10μF, 50v
    1 x 3.3μF, 50v - bipolar
    3 x 1μF, 50V
    i have a before - i'll get around to an after some time later!
     
    jim beam, Jan 2, 2006
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.