Latest on Civic hybrid gas mileage problem

Discussion in 'Civic' started by muzz, Jan 6, 2005.

  1. muzz

    muzz Guest

    When my Civic hybrid had run 5 or 6 tanks of gas and was only getting
    33 mpg, I took it back to the dealer for an explanation. They told me
    that I couldn't gauge proper gas mileage until the car had at least
    5000 miles on it. Yesterday, after passing the 5000 mile mark and
    still getting about 33 mpg, I took it back again. They ran it on their
    computer and couldn't find any problem. They asked me just what
    mileage I thought I should get, and I said at least 40. You wouldn't
    believe what they next told me - you have to have at least 10,000
    miles on it before you can know what it will permanently get. Now, I
    know that I'm not going to get the advertised 48 city/ 47 highway on
    the mileage, as they run the cars at about 40 mph to test that,
    however, 33 mpg is patently ridiculous don't you agree?
     
    muzz, Jan 6, 2005
    #1
  2. muzz

    cks Guest

    What is the gas mileage for a EX or HX model?
     
    cks, Jan 6, 2005
    #2
  3. muzz

    disallow Guest

    What type of driving mix do you have? (City/Hwy) From what I understand,
    if you do alot of highway, your mileage actually goes down, as the big
    increase comes from the electric motor from a dead stop... No real idea
    though, if I were you i'd be pissed too.

    t
     
    disallow, Jan 6, 2005
    #3
  4. muzz

    Steve Guest

    Not just the electric motor from a stop, but the reclaiming of the energy
    when stopping.

    Steve
     
    Steve, Jan 7, 2005
    #4
  5. muzz

    K`Tetch Guest

    Oh hell yes. My aging 88 civic manages more than that with a full car,
    and its got over 200,000 on it 9as WELL as being a stupid bloody
    automatic)
     
    K`Tetch, Jan 7, 2005
    #5
  6. muzz

    muzz Guest

    I live in the Ft Worth Tx. area. My wife drives the car mostly. She
    drives about 75% town and maybe 25% freeway in her normal
    driving. Trying to get more mileage on it, I drove it on a 1500 mile
    interstate highway trip last summer and averaged 40 mpg. Not
    bad, but the city driving experience is not good. I would have
    bought a regular Civic last time if I knew the mileage figures were
    so fabricated. Had a 97 Civic for 6.7 years and had not a lick
    of trouble with it.
     
    muzz, Jan 7, 2005
    #6
  7. muzz

    Cat Slave Guest

    I think it largely depends on how you drive the car. Maybe there is
    also something wrong with the vehicle. I have a 2005 Hybrid Civic and I
    get roughly 47mpg commuting in heavy traffic 70 miles every day.
    Inflating the tires to 35PSI improved mileage by about 10% for me. Also
    I rarely ever exceed 70mph, and I don't floor the accellerator when I
    accellerate...... If you drive appropriately you should be able to get
    40+ if not sth is probably wrong with the car....
     
    Cat Slave, Jan 7, 2005
    #7
  8. muzz

    Peter H Guest

    It seems to me that it's fairly well known that the mileage claims of
    the hybrids are grossly overstated.

    Peter H
     
    Peter H, Jan 7, 2005
    #8
  9. muzz

    Al Guest

    Indeed. Pumping those tires up helps a lot.
     
    Al, Jan 12, 2005
    #9
  10. muzz

    jthorner Guest

    There are many stories out there like this. I think that Honda and others
    have gamed their hybrid systems somewhat so as to optimize the results on
    the EPA tests, even if those gamed results are unlikely to be duplicated in
    normal driving.

    This sort of thing is commonplace in the work of computer system design
    where all kinds of tricks are used to maximize performance on benchmark
    tests, even when that performance is unlikely to translate into similar
    results for real users.

    The existing EPA test cycles were a response to rampant creative advertising
    during th 70s where the car makers would make all sorts of fuel economy
    claims based on things like only driving downhill. The EPA test cycles
    were designed to attempt to represent typical driving conditions and they
    have served well with the technologies for which they were designed.

    However, hybrids are as much computer software as they are a hardware set
    and provide many more opportunities to tweak for the test, sort of like
    craming for SATs. Do you think that a student who raises their SAT score
    100 points by taking an SAT prep class has actually gotten any smarter or
    any more likely to do well in college? Absolutely not.

    The hybrid fuel economy testing situation is in my view much the same.

    John
     
    jthorner, Jan 12, 2005
    #10
  11. These complaints about EPA fuel economy results have been around nearly as
    long as I have been driving, and they are valid. The EPA response is that
    the figures are not intended to be real world numbers ("your mileage may
    vary"). When CAFE was introduced EPA fuel economy testing became mandatory.

    Hybrid technology can indeed greatly improve fuel economy, but mostly in
    congested in-town driving. Our 2002 Prius gets 50 mpg or better around town,
    dropping into the mid or lower 40s in the winter. It loves hills, too,
    averaging over 60 mpg on a round trip from Flagstaff to Sedona. But on the
    freeway the economy is much like a typical economy car, only benefitting
    from the engine downsizing allowed by using electricity to do the heavy
    lifting during acceleration.

    To add to the frustration many people feel, more efficient cars lose their
    edge faster than the guzzlers. Running the heater full blast makes nearly no
    difference in our 85 Volvo - it continues to get 20 mpg. The Prius can drop
    from 45 mpg to the 20s on the fairly accurate fuel economy display if I turn
    the heater on full and open the windows.

    I imagine these issues will sharpen as hybrid technology improves, with more
    electric power available and more models using it. The essence of
    hybridization is to separate engine power from acceleration performance, and
    to allow the car to operate more time without running the engine at all.
    (Even the Honda IMA can do this by opening the valves.)

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, Jan 12, 2005
    #11
  12. muzz

    tomamaron Guest

    It's low, but getting good gas mileage from the Civic is half how you drive.
    Constant speeding, using the AC, abrupt stops, short trips, and cold weather
    all drop milage. As mentioned, check your air filter and tire pressure, they
    also effect mileage. When I don't drive the car that often, it gets milage
    in the range you describe. But on regular commutes, my '03 gets in low 40's,
    even higher if I'm stingy.
     
    tomamaron, Jan 12, 2005
    #12
  13. muzz

    Al Guest

    Maybe not patently ridiculous, but ridiculous.

    Try an experiment. Pump up the tires. Lay off the
    accelerator - although that shouldn't make much of
    a difference with a hybrid. Don't do any short trips
    - make sure the shortest trip is no less than 10 miles.
    Don't go fast - keep it under 50 m/hr. Don't drive when
    the outside temperature is less than 60 F. Lay off the pizza.
    Do that for one full tank and see what happens.

    I have a 98 Civic HX and, in the summer, I never get
    less than 50 m/gal. However, I do occasionally get a
    digital gesture from a little old lady. I get them
    all the time from SUV's.
     
    Al, Jan 17, 2005
    #13
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.