Low Fuel Warning Light

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by news.west.earthlink.net, Jan 5, 2007.

  1. My 86 Accord low fuel warning light has always illuminated at about 220
    miles after filling and I could count on 75-100 miles remaining on the tank.

    I have had a 99 Accord for 2 years, and the fuel light has come on 4-5
    times, but at inconsistent mileage, and I usually fill up when I think the
    gage is reading too low to go further. This weekend I ran out of gas, and
    the low fuel light never came on. The gage was below empty, but I had a can
    of gas in the trunk, so I drove to see if the light would ever come on.

    Why would the low fuel light be intermittent and so inconsistent on the
    newer Honda?


    John
     
    news.west.earthlink.net, Jan 5, 2007
    #1
  2. news.west.earthlink.net

    Bucky Guest

    I don't know, but my 2001 Civic's fuel light is worthless, I don't even
    pay any attention to it whatsoever. And the fuel gauge is very
    inconsistent too.
     
    Bucky, Jan 5, 2007
    #2
  3. news.west.earthlink.net

    JXStern Guest

    I forget the behavior of my 87 Accord, I think the light went on
    rather late, but all the Hondas I've had since, the light always went
    on with 2 to 3 gallons left, generally closer to 3, and never failed
    to go on AFAIK.

    J.
     
    JXStern, Jan 5, 2007
    #3
  4. I've noticed strange gauge behaviour in my 2004 Civic as well. The "top
    half" seems to go down more quickly than the "bottom half". But I really
    can't complain; the car did 42mpg on a recent road trip.

    On the other hand, the gauge in my '93 Accord was the opposite. The "bottom
    half" went down more quickly than the "top half".

    I never let the tank get low enough on either car to trigger the light.
     
    High Tech Misfit, Jan 5, 2007
    #4
  5. news.west.earthlink.net

    dgk Guest

    Isn't it considered bad form to run the gas tank so low? The reasoning
    I recall is that stuff settles to the bottom and you don't really want
    that being sucked into the engine. Of course, if you do it all the
    time, I guess the sludge is sucked in in small stages so perhaps isn't
    as bad as doing it all at once. But I'm just a lurker. Perhaps the
    knowledgeable folks will chime in.
     
    dgk, Jan 5, 2007
    #5
  6. news.west.earthlink.net

    Thom Guest

    That's not the only reason. The biggest reason I see is that the fuel
    pump, if in the tank, uses the gas for cooling. Running tank too low
    reduces it's ability to be cooled by the fuel.
     
    Thom, Jan 5, 2007
    #6
  7. news.west.earthlink.net

    L Alpert Guest

    Same thing with my 2004 Accord, it may be due to an odd shaped tank while
    the sending unit is linear. I had an older Camry where the top half of the
    tank would last twice as long as the bottom half.
     
    L Alpert, Jan 6, 2007
    #7
  8. news.west.earthlink.net

    COH Guest

    The past poster is correct about the sending unit being linear, and the
    tank being tapered. As well, some sending units don't see a reduction
    in the amount of fuel in the tank for some time.... You drive for 100
    km (60 miles), and the guage hardly moves from a full tank. Once it
    starts to drop, it drops faster than you might expect. As for running
    with low fuel levels, we live in a cold climate (Ontario Canada) and
    running with low fuel levels increases the amount of condensation in
    the tank, when days are warm and nights considerably colder. I try not
    to run my vehicles with less than a half tank.
     
    COH, Jan 7, 2007
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.