MIKE Hunter's smaller car thesis??

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by GO Mavs, Jun 30, 2007.

  1. My apologies. I am so used to right-wingers throwing out non
    sequiturs that I didn't read it carefully. I will administer the
    lashes to myself.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Jul 11, 2007
  2. GO Mavs

    z Guest

    As somebody once said, you can turn on Formula One on TV and watch a
    skinny little French guy sititng in a bathtub full of gasoline ram
    into a wall at 200 mph and walk away.
     
    z, Jul 16, 2007
  3. GO Mavs

    z Guest

    As somebody once said, you can turn on Formula One on TV and watch a
    skinny little French guy sititng in a bathtub full of gasoline ram
    into a wall at 200 mph and walk away.
     
    z, Jul 16, 2007
  4. GO Mavs

    z Guest

    Yow, that's a rude thing to say.
     
    z, Jul 17, 2007
  5. GO Mavs

    z Guest

    Yow, that's a rude thing to say.
     
    z, Jul 17, 2007
  6. GO Mavs

    Just Facts Guest

    Here our Gov medical system and our Gov auto insurance only pay part of
    your medical bill if you have driving injuries and weren't wearing your
    seat belt.
     
    Just Facts, Jul 24, 2007
  7. GO Mavs

    Just Facts Guest

    Here our Gov medical system and our Gov auto insurance only pay part of
    your medical bill if you have driving injuries and weren't wearing your
    seat belt.
     
    Just Facts, Jul 24, 2007
  8. GO Mavs

    Josh S Guest

    He probably has most of his money invested in GM, the company that just
    loves making big profit on big SUVs.
     
    Josh S, Jul 24, 2007
  9. GO Mavs

    Josh S Guest

    He probably has most of his money invested in GM, the company that just
    loves making big profit on big SUVs.
     
    Josh S, Jul 24, 2007
  10. GO Mavs

    Just Facts Guest

    And if two large SUVs, which have typically less crush zone than a mid
    sized car, hit one another the occupants in both large SUVs are usually
    seriously injured.
    The ultimate dumbness in this "drive very large for safety" argument is
    the person driving a large SUV to defend themselves from a semi.
     
    Just Facts, Jul 24, 2007
  11. GO Mavs

    Just Facts Guest

    And if two large SUVs, which have typically less crush zone than a mid
    sized car, hit one another the occupants in both large SUVs are usually
    seriously injured.
    The ultimate dumbness in this "drive very large for safety" argument is
    the person driving a large SUV to defend themselves from a semi.
     
    Just Facts, Jul 24, 2007
  12. GO Mavs

    Just Facts Guest

    -who were driving large SUVs when they had a single vehicle roll over
    accident?
     
    Just Facts, Jul 24, 2007
  13. GO Mavs

    Just Facts Guest

    -who were driving large SUVs when they had a single vehicle roll over
    accident?
     
    Just Facts, Jul 24, 2007
  14. GO Mavs

    Guest Guest

    So the oil drilling companies only employ left handed people.
    Mike your prejudices are showing again!
     
    Guest, Jul 24, 2007
  15. GO Mavs

    Guest Guest

    So the oil drilling companies only employ left handed people.
    Mike your prejudices are showing again!
     
    Guest, Jul 24, 2007
  16. GO Mavs

    Viperkiller Guest

    As a point of fact, it seems more vested in Ford. Either way, he's on
    the loosing end.
     
    Viperkiller, Jul 25, 2007
  17. GO Mavs

    Viperkiller Guest

    As a point of fact, it seems more vested in Ford. Either way, he's on
    the loosing end.
     
    Viperkiller, Jul 25, 2007
  18. GO Mavs

    Houston Guest


    Well I'm also a structural engineer and your assumption is flawed. I
    agree with you if the two different size vehicles have equal stiffness
    but if the larger one was more stiff and the smaller one less stiff,
    it may be that the larger one has the fatalities and the smaller one
    has survivors.
     
    Houston, Sep 7, 2007
  19. GO Mavs

    Houston Guest


    Well I'm also a structural engineer and your assumption is flawed. I
    agree with you if the two different size vehicles have equal stiffness
    but if the larger one was more stiff and the smaller one less stiff,
    it may be that the larger one has the fatalities and the smaller one
    has survivors.
     
    Houston, Sep 7, 2007
  20. GO Mavs

    Mike Dobony Guest

    I believe this is called "crush zones" where sections of a car are designed
    to crush easily in a crash to absorbed the impact. The old race cars were
    built so stiff and solid that they readily survived crashes relatively
    intact, but the driver was killed. This also depends on how small the
    vehicle is. I recall the original Honda that was about half the size of a
    standard compact car. There was no room for any crush zone and it would go
    flying when hit due to lack of weight. This is not good if slammed into a
    tree or other structure.

    Depending on the specifics of the crash, a large SUV will not be pushed as
    much as a smaller car and in some instances a larger vehicle will give the
    occupants a better chance of surviving. It all depends on so many factors
    that you can not make any blanket statements about survivability.
     
    Mike Dobony, Sep 7, 2007
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.