Most fuel efficient speed to drive?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by mvl_groups_user, Aug 30, 2005.

  1. Back when cars had carburetors, hard acceleration would reduce fuel
    efficiency, because the accelerator pump in the carburetor would
    squirt extra fuel into the carburetor each time the accelerator was
    depressed. You could see the wasted fuel blow out of the exhaust pipe
    as blaclk smoke.

    With modern fuel injected cars, that does not happen. Instead, the
    computer constantly adjusts the fuel mixture to the optimum ratio,
    depending on engine speed and throttle setting. So I really don't
    think it matters a whole lot.

    A couple of years ago I read an article that suggested, based on
    computer models, that is was better to accelerate the fuel injected
    car up to cruising speed relatively quickly (not flooring it!),
    because that would mean less time spent with a richer fuel/air mixture
    and thus less total fuel expended. But that was a computer simulation,
    not real world driving.



    Elliot Richmond
    Freelance Science Writer and Editor
     
    Elliot Richmond, Sep 22, 2005
    #21
  2. mvl_groups_user

    jim beam Guest

    on a p.o.s. detroit hunkohunk, sure. today, that still happens, but to
    a lesser degree because it's more precise /and/ catalysts take the sting
    out of the visuals for you.
    yes it does - enrichment prevents flame-out. that's why it was done
    with carburetted cars. and why it's still done with injected cars.
    check out the megasquirt diy injector kit and read the source code if
    you don't believe it.
    including enrichment on acceleration!
     
    jim beam, Sep 22, 2005
    #22
  3. mvl_groups_user

    Jason Guest

    MVL,
    There are two car mechanics that have a column in many different
    newspapers. They wrote a column on this subject several months ago. They
    stated that an engine will last much longer if you have slow starts from
    stop signs and stop lights. I don't remember whether or not they discussed
    gas mileage related to this subject. I don't advise you to have a slow
    start related to getting on freeways or interstates. In most cases, it's
    best to have fast starts--for safety reasons when getting on freeways and
    interstates. I hate it when people--especially really old people--try to
    get on freeways on interstates while going at a really low speed.
     
    Jason, Sep 22, 2005
    #23
  4. mvl_groups_user

    Alan Browne Guest

    Per Consumer Reports, some years ago, a "brisk" but not hard
    acceleration is most fuel efficient. Slow accelerations are not
    efficient either.

    I have a manual transmission so I try to accelerate in 4000 - 5000 range.

    If you're flooring the starts, there is no way it is more efficient than
    what the transmission is automatically doing.

    Cheers,
    Alan
     
    Alan Browne, Sep 24, 2005
    #24
  5. mvl_groups_user

    JXStern Guest

    Downhill is good. :)

    If you drive an Accord (with automatic) so that the tach even gets
    momentarily to peak torque around 4500, you're going to be moving very
    brisquely.

    Which seems to mean that Honda thinks rather leisurely acceleration is
    preferable, engine staying below 3k

    J.
     
    JXStern, Oct 4, 2005
    #25
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.