New Accord EX - second impressions

Discussion in 'Accord' started by JRStern, Nov 3, 2009.

  1. JRStern

    JRStern Guest

    I think this may be my first US-assembled Honda, I think my 1999 CL
    3.0 may have been US assembled, too.

    But the sheet metal tolerances on this one seem just a *bit* askew,
    probably all within spec, but just barely. And there's this sort of
    weird fold in the rear roof pillars where it meets the rear window, I
    keep looking at that and wondering, "is that on purpose? does it help
    the aerodynamics, or the assembly process, or what?"

    Amd I wish the radio data display was just a few characters wider!
    In fact, while it's a good idea for the LCD display to be shadowed
    deep into the dashboard (unlike the 2007 model), it's farther away,
    the characters are smaller if anything than on the 2007 display, and I
    don't give it very high usability grades. The entire console is
    pretty amateur in design, too wide, have to reach waaaay over for the
    AC button or the radio's channel 6 button, etc.

    But it still strikes me as the most sophisticated Accord ever, by a
    wide margin over the 2007.

    Still using up the first tank of gas to estimate mileage.

    PS - wish they would include on the display options for instantaneous
    mileage and other internal data, rather than making me go buy
    aftermarket products if I want to see it. What's this with Ford, they
    have something that draws a tree as you drive, to show you the mileage
    you're getting?!?

    J.
     
    JRStern, Nov 3, 2009
    #1
  2. JRStern

    Tegger Guest



    Yup. Same plant in Ohio that made the Accord, on which the CL was heavily
    based.



    Panel alignment that is "barely" to spec these days would have been
    considered gold-medal quality just ten years ago.

    Honda's panel alignment, even on US cars, is superb, although such
    precision is rapidly becoming industry-standard. The days of mistake-hiding
    3/16" panel gaps are WAY over.




    Got a pic? I don't see anything I'd consider "weird".




    You won't get anywhere close to the car's final mileage until you've run up
    a couple of thousand miles.
     
    Tegger, Nov 3, 2009
    #2
  3. JRStern

    JRStern Guest

    I believe it's standard, find any 2009/10 sedan and look at the rear
    window (across the rear) to pillar join, a little fold that goes from
    about half an inch to zero ... I'd have to go out to the lot and
    fondle the car to remind myself exactly what the deal is.

    And I'm not sure of those tolerances, btw, Honda and most of the
    Japanese have had super tolerances for twenty years now, and the
    current model seems designed to allow for an extra millimeter or so
    all over the place. One might never notice unless looking to check
    upon the fit, but then it seems to be pretty obvious.

    J.

    .... walking outside to check on my car and any other 2009/10 Accords
    on the block ...
     
    JRStern, Nov 4, 2009
    #3
  4. JRStern

    tww1491 Guest

    Be interested to hear if you have any premature brake wear. From what I have
    seen from some posts, the rear brake pads wear out around 20k miles or so.
     
    tww1491, Nov 4, 2009
    #4
  5. JRStern

    JRStern Guest

    Had that on the 2007 - and 2004.

    But I believe at least the 2004 had small (8"?) rears, and the new
    model has 11".

    J.
     
    JRStern, Nov 4, 2009
    #5
  6. JRStern

    JRStern Guest

    OK, I see the same thing on 2009 Civic Sedan Hybrid, 2009 Accord
    2-door, new-looking Volvo sedan, and newish Audi A6 has the entire
    rear windshield half an inch below the pillars.

    Look where the rear trunk lid meets the rear windshield, it's about a
    half-inch below the end of the pillar, and it ramps to the top where
    the top of the windshield is flush with the pillar.

    Probably does reduce wind noise, trailing turbulence, by a tad.

    J.
     
    JRStern, Nov 4, 2009
    #6
  7. JRStern

    tww1491 Guest

    No real problem with my 06 coupe -- rears went at 53k
     
    tww1491, Nov 4, 2009
    #7
  8. JRStern

    JRStern Guest

    Do you brake hard?

    Dealer said if you brake gently, that's when the rears are more used
    now. I asked if I should just hammer it then, and he sort of mumbled.
    But I guess using the rears more reduces dive, arguably increases
    control - as long as they're sized properly!

    J.
     
    JRStern, Nov 4, 2009
    #8
  9. JRStern

    E. Meyer Guest

    My 2000 Acura TL came from that same plant in Ohio. Tolerances were clearly
    less perfect than on my Japan built '96 Odyssey. I remember taking the
    Acura back a couple of times to get a few panels re-aligned when it was new.
     
    E. Meyer, Nov 4, 2009
    #9
  10. JRStern

    Gary44 Guest

    I have a 2005 Accord, and just hit 82,000 miles. So far, needed new
    tires at 60,000 miles, and basic maintenance, but that's been it.
    I would highly recommend any Hondas. My wife has a 2005 Civic that has
    also been very reliable.
     
    Gary44, Feb 6, 2010
    #10
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.