New headlamp bulb tests

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Daniel Stern Lighting, Sep 24, 2003.

  1. AutoExpress finally released the results of their new H4 (=9003, =HB2)
    bulb tests.

    Nothing that shocked me. In a nutshell, OSRAM (not Sylvania) Silverstar or
    Philips VisionPlus is the best standard-wattage bulb you can buy, the
    best blue-coated bulb's performance doesn't match a decent standard bulb,
    PIAA is garbage, and the range of performance in bulbs on the market is
    huge.

    Viz:

    Standard and blue bulbs:

    http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/product_test/product_test_story.php?id=39920

    "Plus 30" high efficiency bulbs:

    http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/product_test/product_test_story.php?id=39919

    "Plus 50" ultra high efficiency bulbs:

    http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/product_test/product_test_story.php?id=39917


    Annd surprise of surprises, people who come to me wanting blue crapola or
    demanding to know where I get off trashing PIAA's "good name" are always
    stunned at how well they can see when I send them away with...with...well,
    by golly, with the bulbs this test, done an ocean away from me, says work
    best!

    DS
    Who is beginning to tend towards cynicism but hates to say "Toldjya"
     
    Daniel Stern Lighting, Sep 24, 2003
    #1
  2. Daniel Stern Lighting

    redeyedevil Guest

    Any one know where to find the OSRAM Silverstar or Philips VisionPlus in the
    U.S.? I found the Sylvania XtraVision at Pep Boys, but not the above two.
     
    redeyedevil, Sep 24, 2003
    #2
  3. Daniel Stern Lighting

    Ricardo Guest

    Uhhh, Daniel Stern Lighting might just stock those for ya. :} These
    are "Euro" only bulbs, though, ergo not available in types HB1 and
    HB5.
    Sylvania XtraVision 9003XV is equivalent to Osram Super H4, hmmm? Or
    at least so damn similar that it is for all purposes the same.
    Theoretically, 9003/HB2 stipulates a 100µ (or is it 100n? My brain's
    fuzzy tonight) tighter filament tolerance and, uhhh, that's just
    about it. Oh yeah, the HB2 bulbs have "DOT" marked on 'em too. For
    quality bulbs, 9003/HB2 and H4 are equals, no matter what the
    "competent" authorities may advise you counter to that truth.
     
    Ricardo, Sep 24, 2003
    #3
  4. Daniel Stern Lighting

    Ricardo Guest

    These comparisons are always fascinating. It's amazing how much junk
    proliferates the market, even in real bulb formats like H4 (as
    opposed to FMVSS crap, which is junk no matter how ya swing it).
    And much as I like the appearance of the quality legal blue bulbs,
    that is the reason why I'm not likely to be putting them in my cars.
    If I did have real headlamps ($$$$$$) I probably still wouldn't do
    it, but as things stand, I can barely see the road on low beam and
    hafta drive by instinct and WAGging, so to speak, while bearing the
    glare of oncoming traffic's SAE low beams (guess there's no way of
    weaseling out of that one).
    Shocking, isn't it?
    That's assuming they actually have headlamps that "work best", of
    course, and that's a major ASSumption in this part of the world. I'm
    totally amazed at the mass of folks who own cars with generically
    shaped and sized headlamp buckets who are STILL running sealed bum
    junk, when they could have real composite headlamps for a relative
    pittance. My landlord is still using the DoT crapola on his Jetta,
    though I tried to talk him into getting real lights, since he too
    drives quite a lot at night and has also been considering doing
    major mod jobs to his car (souped up engine, Brembos, sport
    suspension, the usual stuff). Sheesh, I mean, if one has the $$$
    even to think about all that shawozzles, then I think decent (or at
    least half decent) lighting is an essential addition to the mix. And
    that's not just because of your bad influence. <g>
     
    Ricardo, Sep 24, 2003
    #4
  5. Daniel Stern Lighting

    TransFixed Guest

    Top-posting to provide insight to all readers,

    Can you translate this so it is useful to the average consumer????

    - D.
     
    TransFixed, Sep 24, 2003
    #5
  6. Daniel Stern Lighting

    Ricardo Guest

    What precisely is eluding your comprehension?
     
    Ricardo, Sep 24, 2003
    #6
  7. Daniel Stern Lighting

    redeyedevil Guest

    Could you please elaborate a bit on this? Tighter filament tolerance than
    what?

    It so happened that my daily driver, a '98 Honda Civic specified the 9003.
    The XtraVision appears moderately brighter. Not sure if it is 30% more.
    Not even sure what 30% more looks like.
     
    redeyedevil, Sep 24, 2003
    #7
  8. Daniel Stern Lighting

    Nathan Nagel Guest

    OK, I know that Osram and Sylvania are actually one big happy family,
    but is Philips somehow associated with Hella? By what logic are they
    using the same name for two different products? Kinda confusing when
    someone asks you what's a good bulb and you say "Silverstar or
    VisionPlus... oh wait a second..." Even more confusing when one
    product with the same name is decent and one sucks...

    nate
     
    Nathan Nagel, Sep 24, 2003
    #8
  9. Daniel Stern Lighting

    Nathan Nagel Guest

    You're assuming that sealed beams are bad, which is not necessarily the
    case. I remember being shocked the first time I drove my Daytona at
    night - those 40 year old Tung-Sol sealed beams (not halogen, even!) did
    a pretty respectable job of lighting up the road - better than some new
    headlight designs for sure. Progress? We don't need no steenkin'
    progress.

    nate
     
    Nathan Nagel, Sep 24, 2003
    #9
  10. Daniel Stern Lighting

    Matt B. Guest

    The 9003 (also known as HB2) is basically a H4 bulb built to tighter
    tolerances. What that means is that the filament placement may vary a
    certain amount during construction but in US-spec (9003/HB2) applications it
    can't vary much. To for a H4 bulb to meet US standards and to be allowed to
    be blessed as a 9003, the filaments have less permission to vary from their
    designed position during construction. This dates back to the early 1990s
    primarily when US-spec headlamps were still mechanically aimed using the
    three bumps on the lens of the lamp. If those were used and the filament
    was too far off, the lamp would still be incorrectly aimed. However ECE
    regulations permitted more leeway in filament placement because lamps were
    visually aimed using the cutoff in the light pattern. The US does permit
    visual aiming now (as you may see in lamps with no bumps on the lens) but
    the standard for the 9003 bulb still stands for lamps that use the bulb and
    yet are still mechanically aimed.
     
    Matt B., Sep 24, 2003
    #10
  11. Daniel Stern Lighting

    Steve Guest

    Top-posting an answer:

    Don't waste money on a) any blue bulb or b) any PIAA product.


    TransFixed wrote:
     
    Steve, Sep 24, 2003
    #11
  12. In North America: I keep 'em. So does Candlepower, Inc.

    Worldwide: You can order 'em from powerbulbs.com, and they'll be shipped
    from the UK.

    DS
    (to write to me, remove the headlamp from my address)
     
    Daniel Stern Lighting, Sep 24, 2003
    #12
  13. http://lighting.mbz.org/tech/tech.html


    DS
     
    Daniel Stern Lighting, Sep 24, 2003
    #13
  14. Cross Poster's Suck.
     
    Peter Cressman, Sep 24, 2003
    #14
  15. In a nutshell:

    Reject any headlamp bulb that does not have CLEAR, UNCOLORED glass -- no
    blue or purple or "extra white" or "superwhite" or "silver" colors.

    Reject any headlamp bulb that is not made by
    Philips/Narva/Norma/Wagner/Candlepower, GE/Tungsram, or Osram/Sylvania.

    Reject any headlamp bulb making claims about the color or "kelvin
    temperature" or appearance of the light produced, e.g. "whiter",
    "whitest", "close to daylight", "similar to HID headlamps", etc.

    Follow these three rules and you're almost certain to get a perfectly good
    headlamp bulb.

    If you want better than "good", use:

    Sylvania Xtravision (9000-series)
    Candlepower Brightlight (reboxed Narva Rangepower, 9000 and H-series)
    Narva Rangepower (9000-series and H-series)
    Wagner BriteLite (9000-series)
    GE High Output (9000-series)
    Osram Super (H-series)
    Philips Premium (H-series)
    Philips High Visibility (9000-series)

    If you want the best, and your car takes H7, H1 or H4 (=9003), use:

    Osram Silverstar (NOT the same as Sylvania Silverstar!)
    Candlepower Super BrightLight (reboxed Osram Silverstar)
    Philips VisionPlus
    Tungsram Super Megalicht

    DS
     
    Daniel Stern Lighting, Sep 24, 2003
    #15
  16. http://vrx.net/dsl/tsb/brite_lite_plus_30.pdf
    http://vrx.net/dsl/tsb/brite_lite_plus_50.pdf

    Others that may be of general interest:

    http://vrx.net/dsl/tsb/DOT_mark.pdf
    http://vrx.net/dsl/tsb/9004_9007.pdf
    http://vrx.net/dsl/tsb/high_wattage.pdf

    DS
     
    Daniel Stern Lighting, Sep 24, 2003
    #16
  17. Yeah, hold yer horses, Ricardo, Nate's got a good point. I can think of a
    several dozen different makes and models sold in the 20 years since Ford's
    "better idea" stuck us with the first replaceable-bulb headlamps in the US
    since '40, on which the headlamp performance is so rotten that the owners
    would *kill* for the performance of an ordinary large or small round or
    rectangular set of sealed beam headlamps.

    That's not to say that sealed beams as implemented in the US were the
    be-all and end-all of headlamps, because they weren't and aren't. But the
    *concept* of sealed-beam standard-size headlamps has a lot to recommend it
    (proof against environmental damage and improper bulbs, inexpensive to
    replace if damaged, oldest vehicles get newest lighting advances simply by
    replacing old standard-size lamps with new standard-size lamps).

    Sealed beams can be made to produce whatever kind of light, in whatever
    beam pattern, is desired. It was the implementation that wasn't as good as
    we might've wanted, not the concept, and even the implementation as it was
    is far better than a great many model-dedicated replaceable-bulb lamps.
    I'll confirm that. Many of the old non-halogen sealed beams had much
    better beam patterns than the later halogen units. The light color was
    piss-yellow, and the high beams were weak due to jurassic high beam
    intensity caps (we've now progressed to the stone age), but the beam
    formation on low beam was surprisingly good compared to a lot of more
    recent headlamps.

    DS
     
    Daniel Stern Lighting, Sep 24, 2003
    #17
  18. Which, if any, sealed beam headlamps currently available in the US are
    good (or the least bad if none of them are good) in terms of beam pattern?
    Or are ECE headlamps from Cibie or whatever the only real option if one
    wants a good beam pattern?
     
    Timothy J. Lee, Sep 24, 2003
    #18
  19. Valid answer to this depends on what you want to do, with what kind of
    vehicle, using which headlamp form factor.

    DS
     
    Daniel Stern Lighting, Sep 24, 2003
    #19
  20. Only when it's off topic.

    We all have headlights on our cars and most people like better
    lighting.
    --
    Brandon Sommerville
    remove ".gov" to e-mail

    Definition of "Lottery":
    Millions of stupid people contributing
    to make one stupid person look smart.
     
    Brandon Sommerville, Sep 24, 2003
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.