New Timing Belt at 360K Miles?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Jeff Kolodziej, May 17, 2005.

  1. Honda Gurus:

    I own a '90 Accord with 360,000 miles on it. The car has been
    very reliable over the past 15 years. I have replaced the
    normal wear-and-tear items like brake rotors, brake pads,
    tires, batteries, fuel pump, etc. I do have the original
    engine, original transmission, and original clutch. The
    car is starting to rust out pretty badly, but mechanically
    runs as well as when it was new. I wonder, however, how
    much longer the car can realistically run. Sooo, should
    I replace the timing belt in anticipation that the car
    will run another 90K miles; or, should I just leave the
    current timing belt in and plan to replace the car when
    the belt breaks?

    Thanks for the advice.

    Regards,

    Jeff Kolodziej
     
    Jeff Kolodziej, May 17, 2005
    #1
  2. Jeff Kolodziej

    Elle Guest

    Unless I hated the way the car looked (because of the rust you mention), and
    based on your description of the car's condition, I personally would gamble
    on the car lasting at least another 50k miles and so install a new timing
    belt for the few hundred dollars it costs to do so. Even if you pay as high
    as $600 at the dealer's for a new timing belt, that's still only 1.2 cents
    per mile, which roughly suggests it's a good investment, car-wise.

    Elle
    91 Civic owner; 165k miles; planning on keeping it about five more years
    (maybe longer); will install a new timing belt by myself in 2007.
     
    Elle, May 17, 2005
    #2
  3. Jeff Kolodziej

    motsco_ _ Guest


    ----------------------

    Passing a long load at highway speed (with on-coming traffic)is never a
    good time to blow your engine. Murphy's Law says your timing belt will
    break at the most innoportune time. Get rid of the car or fix the
    engine, please :-(

    'Curly'
     
    motsco_ _, May 17, 2005
    #3
  4. Jeff Kolodziej

    SoCalMike Guest

    your call, dude. its had a long life. personally, id consider selling it
    for a thou or less and getting the new car now. when the belt breaks,
    its not going to be worth trying to sell. and it might not make it
    another 90k.

    then again, it just might. how attached to the car are you?
     
    SoCalMike, May 18, 2005
    #4
  5. I would replace the belt. Belts have a tendency to break at the most
    inconvenient times.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, May 18, 2005
    #5
  6. Jeff Kolodziej

    jim beam Guest

    hate to ask the obvious question, but when was it changed last? if it
    was 150k ago, i'd change it. if it was 60k, i'd leave it.
     
    jim beam, May 19, 2005
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.