Oddesy V. Sienna

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Charles Pisano, Aug 9, 2005.

  1. I was seriously considering a Sienna or oddy . So I did what I usually
    do when I'm going to buy a new car, I test drive an older version. I
    tested an '01 Sienna. I wasn't impressed. It felt tired but only had
    about 64k miles or so.

    Then I saw a 2000 oddy on a lot. It had 54k miles. So I drove it. And it
    blew away the Sienna. I hate to say it cause I own an 01 Camry. I had
    the saleman check the manual during the drive and it said the timing
    belt needed to be changed every 60k miles?? I think this is a huge
    drawback (the sienna is a 90k change) to an otherwise fine ride. Is
    that the case on the 05's ???

    Maybe he read it wrong? Is this one of those engines that messes up
    real bad when the TB breaks? I kinda like the styleing of the 2000 vs .
    the newer oddy.
     
    Charles Pisano, Aug 9, 2005
    #1
  2. Charles Pisano

    John Horner Guest

    The big worry with the Ody is the high failure rate of automatic
    transmissions.

    John
     
    John Horner, Aug 9, 2005
    #2
  3. Charles Pisano

    Dave Kelsen Guest

    Yes, he read it wrong. The engine *is* an interference engine, but the
    timing belt change interval for the 1999 - 2004 Odyssey engine is
    105,000 miles, not 60,000.

    I, too, prefer the older styling. The 2005 makes me think of the Dodge
    with its cladding.

    I have 97,000 miles on my 2001 Odyssey, and like most, have had no
    transmission problems. However, the transmission has been problematic
    on larger percentage (still a small percentage overall) of Odysseys than
    it has historically been with Honda transmissions.

    RFT!!!
    Dave Kelsen
     
    Dave Kelsen, Aug 10, 2005
    #3
  4. I have a 2000 Od with 82K miles and it has been great. The only problem has
    been the EGR flow problem which was fixed today by Honda at no charge. They
    have extended the warranty on this problem to 80K and on the trans to 100K
    miles. The timing belt change interval is 105K, BTW, not 60K.

    It did blow away the Toyota at the time we bought it new. From what I hear,
    however, the new Sienna is much more competitive with the new Od. I'd drive
    the new ones carefully before deciding.

    Leonard
     
    Leonard Caillouet, Aug 10, 2005
    #4
  5. Charles Pisano

    Erik Guest

    It's not a bad idea to replace timing belts every 60k, even if the
    manual says more...

    Don't know if the 2k Oddy had an interference engine or not, but suspect
    it does... nice van though, my mom has one. It does have a good bit of
    interior road noise at highway speeds.

    Erik
     
    Erik, Aug 10, 2005
    #5
  6. Thanks for the responses. Actually thinking of getting the used Honda I
    test drove now. Or another private owner used honda. It handles great,
    like a car. Seems shorter than toyota?? Closer to a dodge caravan short
    WB version?

    Don't like the metal that sticks out in differnt places when the back
    seat is folded down but that is a minor issue. I did read about trans
    problems and they even happen with the new hondas?

    Seriously consider dodge (caravan) on this hunt but been there got
    burned by that..

    Don't understand why dodge sells so many minivans when you can pretty
    much count on a trans rebuild for sure with them.
     
    Charles Pisano, Aug 10, 2005
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.