opinions on way to go...

Not very likely and if it is worth more than the market price
at lease termination, you paid way to much on the lease. The
fact remains, if one knows anything about leasing they would KNOW
it is ALWAYS less costly to simply finance the vehicle rather
than leasing it and buying it at the end of the lease


mike hunt

 

And yet again...fact remains that the above statement is *NOT TRUE*.

There *ARE IN FACT* certain circumstances, that one could save money
leasing...then buying it out at the end, as apposed towards buying
(financing) it. Is it rare...sure it is, but Mike's (continual) across the
board remarks that it can never happen are...well...just wrong.

Our village idiot yet again insists on absolutes...which of course clearly
shows his ignorance.

 

Your are certainly entitled to your opinion, no matter how
uninformed it my be, but that merely shows you know nothing
about leasing. If you did you would know leasing is never
a less costly alternative to OWNING a vehicle. From someone
who sold thousands of leases I can assure you leasing is
indeed a less expensive way of USING a vehicle for a specified
period, but once one decides to finance the residual any
advantage to leasing is lost and the total cost of accusation
is greater in the end than simply financing the vehicle at
prevailing interest rates, period. One can prove it to
themselves when getting a lease quote, let use a three year lease
as an example, but it applies to ANY lease. After you get the
total cost a the three lease, ask the F&I man to quote you the
monthly payment for two years on a three year old used car rate
valued at the residual. Add the two together to get the total
cost of the three year lease and the total cost of buying it at
the end of the lease and financing it for two years. Then Ask for
a quote for a five year finance contract. The result will be
obvious to anyone.


mike hunt

 

the total cost of accusation

?????????



....................
I do not killfile nor use do-not-call lists.

 

Huh?

You know what's sad...there's a village out there...with no idiot.

 

My I suggest one look to Webster or Funk and Wagnal?


mike hunt

 

Agreed. But for those who show a repeating pattern of ignoring facts, and
who knowingly spew untruths...I call an idiot.

I guess that's were we are different Mike. I call 'em, as I see 'em, and
regardless whether you are disabled or not, you cant come in here lying,
spreading mistruths, and *CONTINUE TO DO SO* after is has been clearly
proven...well...you cant hide under that "disabled blanket" here...sorry
Duddit.

You sir...are an idiot...period.

Nuff said.. [huuuge grin]

 

Apparently some have a comprehension problem with the written
word but that does not make one an idiot. I would not call
anyone an idiot even if you were one in any event, I have great
compassion for the disabled among us..


mike hunt


uninformed it my be, but that merely shows you know nothing
about leasing. If you did you would know leasing is never
a less costly alternative to OWNING a vehicle. From someone
who sold thousands of leases I can assure you leasing is
indeed a less expensive way of USING a vehicle for a specified
period, but once one decides to finance the residual any
advantage to leasing is lost and the total cost of accusation
is greater in the end than simply financing the vehicle at
prevailing interest rates, period. One can prove it to
themselves when getting a lease quote, let use a three year lease
as an example, but it applies to ANY lease. After you get the
total cost a the three lease, ask the F&I man to quote you the
monthly payment for two years on a three year old used car rate
valued at the residual. Add the two together to get the total
cost of the three year lease and the total cost of buying it at
the end of the lease and financing it for two years. Then Ask for
a quote for a five year finance contract. The result will be
obvious to anyone.

 

Only in your small world. As to your opinions, you can believe
what you wish I could not car less. The problem is you may
present others with the wrong impressions of leasing vis a v
purchasing. My comments on leasing come from over ten years of
selling thousands of leases. Your choosing not to believe what I
posted and calling one names because you want to comment on a
subject, of which you obviously have little or no knowledge, says
a lot more about you than me.


mike hunt

Your are certainly entitled to your opinion, no matter how
uninformed it my be, but that merely shows you know nothing
about leasing. If you did you would know leasing is never
a less costly alternative to OWNING a vehicle. From someone
who sold thousands of leases I can assure you leasing is
indeed a less expensive way of USING a vehicle for a specified
period, but once one decides to finance the residual any
advantage to leasing is lost and the total cost of accusation
is greater in the end than simply financing the vehicle at
prevailing interest rates, period. One can prove it to
themselves when getting a lease quote, let use a three year lease
as an example, but it applies to ANY lease. After you get the
total cost a the three lease, ask the F&I man to quote you the
monthly payment for two years on a three year old used car rate
valued at the residual. Add the two together to get the total
cost of the three year lease and the total cost of buying it at
the end of the lease and financing it for two years. Then Ask for
a quote for a five year finance contract. The result will be
obvious to anyone.


mike hunt

 

For what?
*Acquisition*?
Is that a word in one of those thousands of leases you've sold?

 

Apparently my automatic spell checker preferred accusation when I
missed the 'q' in my spelling of acquisition, but you're an
intelligent fellow, knew what I meant.

mike hunt

 

Too bad your spell checker cant help you with grammar.

You're an idiot.

 

Wrong again idiot.

First off, its fact...not opinion. Second, you obviously care enough to keep
responding, thus, you could care less.

I present the real-world scenarios, not some mis-guided cock-n-bull you make
up in your little pointed head.

I don't believe you. Given your past...um...input into this group, it is
obvious you have little to no real knowledge about *anything* to do with
automobiles.

It is obvious that you cut-n-paste your information from the web, and in
some cases (in which you were caught red-handed) just fabricated
information.

Your the type of kid who wants so badly to be the "BMOC", and see your own
typings in print. I'm guessing your about 14 years old, and get a big woody
when you see yourself tell somebody to "...take your car to the dealer".

"Name calling" is subjective. I truly believe you are an idiot, therefore,
that's not really "name calling". I have also called you dipshit, and all I
can say there is...well...if the shoe fits... [huge grin]

You see Mike...here is more proof that ...well...your just not that smart.

You've been thrown on the carpet, and proven wrong, but you act like
everybody is blind here, and if you just stick to your guns...no matter how
painfully obvious it is that your wrong...it will all go away, and you will
save face. WRONG...that's not going to happen, and for you to insult the
group intelligence that way...well...that only reflects on your own
intelligence, which unfortunately, seems to decline in your every post.

If you don't know what your talking about, then shut up. I will continue to
point out your misinformation and lies as I see fit. If you don't like being
caught, go somewhere else.