OT GM AND SYNTHETIC OIL

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by xxxxxxxx, Nov 24, 2003.

  1. xxxxxxxx

    Huw Guest

    ACEA ratings are European and therefore may not be quoted everywhere.
    The Valvolene probably meets MB229.1 or even 229.3 specification and
    therefore also meets ACEA A2 or A3.
    The oils spec sheet is where you will find the most comprehensive
    information.

    By the way, I hope you do not infer that just because certain
    viscosity grades of Mobil 1 are to a certain standard, then it
    follows that the same viscosities from other manufacturers have the
    same limitations or meet the same standards? It does not follow. The
    viscosity met by an oil is mostly dependant of the performance
    standard met, although certain standards may have a parameter set
    where only a certain range of viscosities are suitable to meet the
    standard.
    I hope that is clear.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Nov 29, 2003
    #61
  2. xxxxxxxx

    Huw Guest

    I agree.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Nov 29, 2003
    #62
  3. xxxxxxxx

    Huw Guest

    Is there any comparison that is meaningful on that site where the oils
    are not drained for the more normal [for M1 0w/40] 12000 to 15000
    miles or more as in a BMW or Mercedes engine?

    Huw
     
    Huw, Nov 29, 2003
    #63
  4. xxxxxxxx

    Phil Smith Guest

    Another important point is that before the engine can warm up, it must
    first start up!
    Oils with lower "cold" viscosity are engineered that way in part to
    provide better lubricity at low temperature so that the other part of
    the automotive power plant, which is operating at greatly reduced
    efficiency to begin with, has minimum resistance to spinning the
    flywheel. (the "cold cranking power" of a typical battery at 0 deg F
    being about 25-35% of what it would be at "room" temperature)

    I leave it to the uninitiated reader to imagine the excitement attendant
    on attempting to jump-start a vehicle at -15 deg F. I can and have!
    (Done it, not just imagined it!)
    -psmith (in New Hampshire)
     
    Phil Smith, Nov 29, 2003
    #64
  5. xxxxxxxx

    Pete Guest

    Yes, there are other UOAs there where the M1 0w-40 has been run for 10K or
    more miles, and at that point its viscosity is back to a 40 grade, but
    you're missing my point. My point was that it is not shear-stable because
    it thins (as proven by the link I posted previously), and then thickens back
    up. While these fluctuations take place, sludge gets deposited inside the
    engine. I'd rather have an oil that stays in grade throughout its life.

    Cheers,

    Pete
     
    Pete, Nov 29, 2003
    #65
  6. xxxxxxxx

    Huw Guest

    You are fairly obviously confusing a variation in viscosity with shear
    stability. When an oil loses its viscosity due to a breakdown of shear
    stability, that is that the molecules have 'sheared', they do not
    regain that viscosity. It is usually a relatively sudden and permanent
    situation where the whole lubrication performance of the oil is
    compromised.
    This is not the case going from your description above.
    This oil [0w/40] is tested and approved for longer than normal service
    use. Part of the standard is for shear stability and for the ability
    to keep contaminants in suspension for a sustained period at high
    levels under severe service. The reason that this oil meets and
    exceeds the higher standards is because it exceeds the Standard for
    these parameters which are MB229.3 and ACEA A3, also BMW Longlife. The
    other oils in the Mobil 1 range do not meet and exceed these Standards
    and are therefore inferior in this respect.
    I would not expect shear stability per-se to be a problem over very
    extended drain intervals in any viscosity or performance standard of
    Mobil 1. It is likely to be the detergency and ability to neutralise
    and suspend high levels of contaminants which compromise their
    performance at extended intervals.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Nov 29, 2003
    #66
  7. xxxxxxxx

    Huw Guest

    Well why not just say that 5w/30 is best for all-year-round use in
    that climate because there is no advantage to be gained from a 10w/30
    in Summer but there is a disadvantage in Winter?

    Huw
     
    Huw, Nov 29, 2003
    #67
  8. xxxxxxxx

    Huw Guest

    .. The
    That didn't read quite right! Substitute "dependant" with INdependant.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Nov 29, 2003
    #68
  9. xxxxxxxx

    Philip® Guest

    In
    Huw... Puleeeeeeeze! That's like saying all brands of extra virgin
    olive oil taste the same. ;-)
    --

    * Philip

    "I'm dreaming of a white Christmas,
    Just like the ones I used the ones I used to know"
    -Bing Crosby
     
    Philip®, Nov 29, 2003
    #69
  10. xxxxxxxx

    Huw Guest

    But why bother with two oils when a 5w/30 will be ideal for both?

    Huw
     
    Huw, Nov 29, 2003
    #70
  11. xxxxxxxx

    Dan Gates Guest

    Haven't really thought about it too much, but watching your neighbour
    freeze in a snowbank kind of takes the bloom of the rose!

    Dan
     
    Dan Gates, Dec 1, 2003
    #71
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.