People who claim 'they could build a 400mpg Hybrid' amuse me.

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by SFTVratings_troy, Feb 14, 2007.

  1. Not so much because of the statement, but because they don't have any
    math to back-up said statement. Might as well say, "If I flap my arms
    real hard, I could fly." Yeah. Sure. If it WERE possible to build a
    400MPG civic or Prius, Honda or Toyota or Ford would would already be
    doing it (and bragging about it on the television).



    There are limits the universe places on Energy-to-Motion conversion.
    You can't exceed those limits. That means NO civic hybrid or prius
    hybrid will ever get 400 mpg. As it stands now, both these hybrids
    are already operating at 40% efficiency. Even if you increased that
    to 60% (a miracle), you'd still only boost them from 50 to 60mpg.

    And if you're a wizard like Gandalf who can magically boost a Prius
    engine to 100%, such that you had a perfect 1-to-1 conversion w/o
    losses, that's still only 125mpg.

    In other words, "a 400mpg prius" is not only a bad idea.
    It violates the Laws of the universe.
    It's perpetual motion.
    Impossible.

    Now if you leave behind the "standard" car shape, and try something
    exotic life a Jetsons-car, then you might be able to do better.
    Volkswagen did exactly that a few years ago, with a 1-seat car, 8
    horsepower engine, and shaped like a cigar.

    But even then, they still only got 250 miles per gallon.
     
    SFTVratings_troy, Feb 14, 2007
    #1
  2. SFTVratings_troy

    Kinik Guest


    I agree it's impossible with the engine design and materials that go into
    cars these days. Way too inefficient and way to heavy.

    It would require a radical new engine design. Most likely something not
    thought of yet.
    It would also require a huge leap forward in materials technology .
    Something that can be affordable, as strong as steel, and be 90% lighter and
    still transport a family.
     
    Kinik, Feb 14, 2007
    #2


  3. Now, with a plug-in hybrid, one can play games. If you only used it
    for trips less than the battery can contribute, one could get infinite
    miles per gallon OF GASOLINE. However, you'd still be using energy,
    of course. It is not really valid to talk about plug-in hybrids in
    terms of mpg, but I suspect that is what some folks are doing.
     
    Don Stauffer in Minnesota, Feb 14, 2007
    #3

  4. In the original Star Trek program, people would use these little data
    storage things the size of small cookies. What did you think about that idea
    when you saw it?
     
    JoeSpareBedroom, Feb 14, 2007
    #4
  5. SFTVratings_troy

    Geoff Guest

    Car and Drive drove a hybrid prius behind a truck that basically eliminated
    all drag. They got around 80 mpg. This was rolling resistance. In real life,
    you're going to get more efficent cars over time. But the practical limit
    for cars is probably around 60-80 mpg with advances in current (hybrid)
    technology. You're not going to do much better by using electricity only.

    36.6 kilowatt hours of electricity has the same amount of energy as one
    gallon of gasoline. To make the answer meaningful, you have to include the
    energy it takes to refine the gasoline and the energy it takes to make the
    electricity.

    http://www.onlineconversion.com/energy.htm

    A kilowatt hour costs about 12 cents to buy, so costs about $4 for the same
    amount of energy as in a gallon of gasoline. But it gas engines are only
    about 40% efficent, so it costs about $5 for the same amount of energy. So
    there is not much cost advantage to using all electricity. Considering that
    the motors only work in an electric car when the engine is working, it
    probably pays off for both the enivronment and in cash for all-electric cars
    with gasoline generators for longer trips (which is what the VW car might
    be).

    jeff
     
    Geoff, Feb 14, 2007
    #5
  6. SFTVratings_troy

    Anim8rFSK Guest

    JoeSpareBedroom, allow me to introduce you to Troy Heagy, performance
    troll and the self styled "most annoying man on usenet"

    Troy posts under at least half a dozen names (see below) and his game is
    to create a thread that might otherwise be interesting, and introduce a
    deliberate mistake into it, and watch it fall apart with people arguing
    about his mistake instead the actual topic.

    He's been busted in rec.arts.tv so many times that he's expanding his
    net to other groups, like mostly sci-fi like Farscape, and now auto
    related ones like these. But he sets the cross posts to rec.arts.tv to
    show that he's still managing to annoy us here.

    He'll now scream that we're haters, and are stalking him, etc., etc.,
    etc., and probably threaten legal action, yadda yadda yadda.

    Oh, and he sends death threats to people that expose him like this, and
    then will claim they've been sending HIM death threats, and writing his
    boss and trying to get him fired, blah blah blah.

    Killfile Troy Heagy in all (s)he-its many incarnations now:
    ,
    ,,
    **DON'T FORGET THE NEWEST ONE>>>
     
    Anim8rFSK, Feb 14, 2007
    #6
  7. SFTVratings_troy

    SFTVratings Guest


    I thought it was theoretically possible, if they used electrons as
    their method of storage. (Where the presence of an electron = 1, or
    the absence thereof = 0.)

    But you see, cars are now reaching the theoretical maximum. You can't
    exceed 100% efficiency, and there are diesels on the road right now
    (like the Lupo) that have 51% peak efficiency. So there's room for
    improvement, but very very little.
     
    SFTVratings, Feb 14, 2007
    #7

  8. Theoretically possible? We have those things now, Einstein.
     
    JoeSpareBedroom, Feb 14, 2007
    #8
  9. SFTVratings_troy

    SFTVratings Guest


    No. The VW cigar-shaped car/prototype was a conventional diesel
    engine. The reason it could get ~250 mpg at highway speeds is because
    it was very, very narrow & its Air resistance was almost null.

    All they needed was an 8 horsepower engine, which burns very little
    fuel.
     
    SFTVratings, Feb 14, 2007
    #9
  10. SFTVratings_troy

    Dano Guest

    You seem to have trouble with the grammatical concept of tense. As in past.
    Re-read the person's post.
     
    Dano, Feb 14, 2007
    #10
  11. SFTVratings_troy

    cja Guest

    IIRC, they used a Honda Insight, not a Prius.

    - cja
     
    cja, Feb 14, 2007
    #11
  12. SFTVratings_troy

    SMS Guest

    They can do it easily. They just have to leave the electricity to charge
    the plug-in hybrid's batteries out of the equation.
     
    SMS, Feb 14, 2007
    #12
  13. SFTVratings_troy

    isquat Guest

    Only the cars that joe schmoe is buying.
    Lotus seven body has been around for more than half of the
    centrury now.
    It's doable but since an average car buyer is a moron
    who is buying a heavy pig (such as a prius) and does not
    pay any attention to the weight aluminum frames for the masses ain't
    gonna happen.
     
    isquat, Feb 14, 2007
    #13
  14. SFTVratings_troy

    curmudgeon Guest

    According to urban myth, the model T-Ford could do 40 mpg.


    "There are no enemies in science just anomalies"
     
    curmudgeon, Feb 14, 2007
    #14
  15. SFTVratings_troy

    SFTVratings Guest



    Yes. Let me rephrase to clarify: [When I originally saw Star Trek
    TOS in the 1980s], I thought it was theoretically possible [to store
    video on tiny cookie-sized wafers] , if they used electrons as their
    method of storage. (Where the presence of an electron = 1, or the
    absence thereof = 0.)

    But the situation we're talking about, making a 400mpg Civic or Prius,
    is never gonna happen. Just as you can not fly by flapping your arms.
     
    SFTVratings, Feb 14, 2007
    #15
  16. SFTVratings_troy

    SFTVratings Guest


    That's called cheating.
     
    SFTVratings, Feb 14, 2007
    #16
  17. True. But we don't know that we've hit those limits, so we keep trying.

    I'm sure people 200 years ago thought we hit all sorts of limits, which
    someone then proceeded to blow through.

    Shoot, at one time heavier-than-air flight was thought impossible.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Feb 14, 2007
    #17
  18. SFTVratings_troy

    Mark Guest

    Not to worry, Joe does the "death threats" thing too... (yawn)
     
    Mark, Feb 14, 2007
    #18

  19. Hey - I never heard back from you on your business theories with the pizza
    place.
     
    JoeSpareBedroom, Feb 14, 2007
    #19
  20. Only the cars that joe schmoe is buying.[/QUOTE]

    Joe Schmoe doesn't have a choice.

    The current Civic Si is several hundred pounds heavier than the 92 Civic
    Si. That's how they build it. It has multiple airbags, etc.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Feb 14, 2007
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.