Plot of Engine Speed vs. Fuel Consumption

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by ecarecar, Apr 12, 2008.

  1. ecarecar

    ecarecar Guest

    I am looking for a plot of engine speed vs. fuel consumption. Is one
    available anywhere? I am not at all picky about what specific engine.
     
    ecarecar, Apr 12, 2008
    #1
  2. ecarecar4/12/08 16:
    While each vehicle reaches its optimal fuel economy at a different speed (or
    range of speeds), gas mileage usually decreases rapidly at speeds above 60
    mph.

    As a rule of thumb, you can assume that each 5 mph you drive over 60 mph is
    like paying an additional $0.20 per gallon for gas. Quote from the feds.

    Graph here:
    http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml
    --
    Pickleman

    Please remove "yourpants" to reply
    1998 Civic HX MT with 142K
    2000 CRV EX MT with 98K
     
    delbert brecht, Apr 12, 2008
    #2
  3. ecarecar

    ecarecar Guest

    I have seen that graph. From where did the data come?
     
    ecarecar, Apr 13, 2008
    #3
  4. ecarecar4/12/08 21:
    The URL says it all. The suffix .gov means it was published by a government
    agency. In this case it means the US Dept. of Energy with cooperation of the
    Dept of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy AND the EPA.
    --
    Pickleman

    Please remove "yourpants" to reply
    1998 Civic HX MT with 142K
    2000 CRV EX MT with 98K
     
    delbert brecht, Apr 13, 2008
    #4
  5. ecarecar

    TE Chea Guest

    Such a graph must be stupid, of course consumption rises
    with rpm

    | gas mileage usually decreases rapidly at speeds above 60 mph.
    Not necessarily fr 60 mph, big factors incl
    exhaust*manifold : cheapo 4-1 short branch * can give
    ¾ of maximum torque @ low rpm <1000, but gives <½
    of maximum torque @>3000 rpm, & even less @ higher
    rpm
    [ii] voltage & ampere from small single coil ( esp if hot )
    drop fast @>3000 rpm : sparks will be too small to
    ignite enough fuel before pistons reach b-d-c, esp where
    only cheapo carbon core cables are used
    [iii] cheapo mineral oil's coarseness are apparent only @ high
    rpm when only the most slippery oil ( e.g. synthetic with
    fullerene ) can produce high torque.
    [iv] gear ratios & axle (tyre) height
     
    TE Chea, Apr 13, 2008
    #5
  6. ecarecar

    Elle Guest

    Just throwing in some other good discussions for the
    archives:

    Optimal speed by model (compact, mid-size, van, etc.)
    http://auto.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=question477.htm&url=http://tqjunior.thinkquest.org/4116/Trip_Planning/speed.htm

    Discussion of how resistance (especially wind resistance)
    causes fuel mileage to plummet at high (55+ mph) speeds:
    http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question477.htm
     
    Elle, Apr 14, 2008
    #6


  7. Needless to say, this guy is wacko. By far the biggest factor in poor
    fuel economy at high speeds is wind resistance. Many vehicles (e.g.
    big SUVs) run less than 3000 rpm at speeds above 60 mph and get much
    reduced fuel economy due to their barn door aerodynamics.

    Of the above, only iv. will have any noticeable effect on fuel
    economy. To the extent that i. reduces power at high speeds it may
    actually reduce fuel consumption.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Apr 15, 2008
    #7
  8. ecarecar

    ecarecar Guest

    Is there something not-too-expensive I could plug in to get the data for
    myself?
     
    ecarecar, Apr 15, 2008
    #8
  9. ecarecar

    jim beam Guest

    c'mon dude - you need to be much more precise with your questions to get
    meaningful answers.

    1. do you mean engine speed or vehicle speed?
    2. what kind of engine?
    3. what kind of fuel?

    there's more, and it's a long list of highly significant variables.

    as for plug-ins, yes, you can use obd output data to compute
    consumption, if you know some other data, but it's a non-trivial
    exercise, and without knowing a /lot/ more detail, you're pretty much
    stuck with getting gas station receipt data, recording mileage between
    each fill-up, then driving different speeds.
     
    jim beam, Apr 15, 2008
    #9
  10. ecarecar

    ACAR Guest

    I suspect Universities that compete in building very fuel efficient
    vehicles (esp. hybrids) would have this information available to the
    public.

    Marine applications may be a source, too.

    Maybe Briggs & Stratton has that info. for their lawn mower engines.
     
    ACAR, Apr 15, 2008
    #10
  11. ecarecar

    ecarecar Guest

    You would think, but, actually, no. They may have it, but it isn't public.

    After years - literally YEARS - of searching, I found information that
    served my purposes.

    This will get you from 0 km/hr to 60 km/hr
    http://www.jari.jp/pdf/rt2005/09Fu_eng.pdf

    This will get you from 50 km/hr to 140 km/hr
    http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/05/fuel_consumptio.htm

    The first, as you might have guess, is from Japan. The second is from
    Germany.
     
    ecarecar, Apr 16, 2008
    #11
  12. Here is a plot of Brake Specific Fuel Consumption vs. rpm for a VW TDI
    engine.

    http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=208125

    BSFC is the measure of how much fuel is being consumed per unit power
    generated - a true fuel efficiency measurement. To get an absolute
    fuel consumption rate, you could multiply the BSFC by power at a given
    rpm. Of course this all assumes wide open throttle. If you are
    running at a lower power setting, the absolute fuel consumption will
    be lower. I would guess that BSFC might be higher or lower depending
    on the way the engine is set up.


    Maybe the OP could tell us exactly what he wants to know.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Apr 16, 2008
    #12
  13. ecarecar

    Graham Guest


    This second link doesn't work for me. Even after correcting obvious
    spelling errors. Could you try again?
    Thanks.
     
    Graham, Apr 16, 2008
    #13
  14. ecarecar

    ecarecar Guest

    "www.greencarcongress.com/2006/05/fuel_consumptio.html"
     
    ecarecar, Apr 16, 2008
    #14
  15. ecarecar

    ecarecar Guest

    This is WOT? Therefore, it is also full throttle ignition advance?
    The bottom of the curve is quite narrow.
     
    ecarecar, Apr 16, 2008
    #15
  16. Well actually it is a diesel so there is no throttle (my bad) and no
    ignition. What I should have said is that I assume this curve is for
    maximum power setting.

    Again, it is not clear exactly what you are trying to show/learn here.
    For example, are you interested in fuel consumption at various engine
    speeds or car speeds?
     
    Gordon McGrew, Apr 17, 2008
    #16
  17. ecarecar

    bi241 Guest

    By laws of aerodynamics, air drag is proportionate to the square of
    the object's velocity. If the speed is doubled, then it requires a
    quadrupled energy to overcome the drag. At the same time, the object
    travels twice the distance. Spending four times the amount of energy
    to propel the object twice the distance means the energy efficiency is
    cut in half.

    Likewise, if the object's velocity is trippled then energy efficiency
    is reduced to one third.. and so on...

    In automobile, rolling friction is also a factor but it's a linear
    drag, while air drag is a quadratic drag. The combined result is
    closer to the air drag only model.

    In layman terms, if you've got a car that does 30 mpg at 60 mph, then
    you can expect 15 mpg at 120 mph. It can be more or less, depending on
    the efficiency of the engine's combustion chambers, and its own
    internal friction at higher rpm
     
    bi241, Apr 17, 2008
    #17
  18. ecarecar

    Graham Guest


    That works!! And so does the other one now if I edit an 'L' where needed.
    It didn't work before.

    Thanks again.
     
    Graham, Apr 17, 2008
    #18
  19. ecarecar

    ecarecar Guest

    I don't know which chart you mean. Not all the cars in the top chart at

    www.greencarcongress.com/2006/05/fuel_consumptio.html

    are diesel.
     
    ecarecar, Apr 18, 2008
    #19
  20. ecarecar

    ecarecar Guest

    Actually, it is a quadrupling of the force.
     
    ecarecar, Apr 18, 2008
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.