R.I.P. General Motors (1931-2006)

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Frater Oconulux 11°, Mar 31, 2006.

  1. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Jason Guest

    I once owned a Chevy Monza and had lots of problems with that car.
    It was the last GM car that I have ever owned. The last two cars
    that I have purchased were Honda Accords. It's my guess that there
    are thousands of people like me. They stopped buying GM cars as a
    direct result of having lots of mechanical and electrical problems
    with GM cars. I do beleive that GM and Ford does a great job in
    regard to making full sized pick-up trucks. I have yet to meet anyone
    that complained about the quality of their full sized GM and Ford
    pick-up trucks.
    Jason
     
    Jason, Apr 3, 2006
  2. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Mike Hunter Guest

    And GM, Ford and Chrysler still outsold Toyota and every other import by
    hundreds of thousands, even millions more vehicles in 2005. Obviously
    hundreds of thousands and millions of buyers do not agrees with your opinion
    of who makes
    the best vehicles ;)


    mike hunt

    ..
     
    Mike Hunter, Apr 3, 2006
  3. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Jason Guest

    I agree with you. You understand statistics and market trends much better
    than the other posters.

    One of the other factors that I don't believe anyone has mentioned is
    related to car sales in foreign countries. Anyone that has visited a
    foreign country or has access to car sales data from foreign countries
    will tell you that Honda and Toyota sells many more vehicles in foreign
    countries than Ford or GM. That is related to the bottom line (eg profit
    vs loss).
    Jason
     
    Jason, Apr 3, 2006
  4. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Mike Hunter Guest

    Then you think it is good thing for the American workers to buy a Toyota
    made in Japan of Chinese parts or a Chevy made in Korea of Korean parts to
    help send their childrens jobs off shore? LOL


    mike hunt
     
    Mike Hunter, Apr 3, 2006
  5. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Mike Hunter Guest

    You forget to say GM no longer makes the cars they made in the eighties.


    mike hunt
     
    Mike Hunter, Apr 3, 2006
  6. Frater Oconulux 11°

    sigvald Guest

    Well, it is hardly his fault that you are linguistically challenged, is
    it?
     
    sigvald, Apr 3, 2006
  7. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Mike Hunter Guest

    Sort of make the statement seem foolish doesn't it. Same management same
    workers and in many cases same engines, trannys as in the some of the cars.
    The fact is every mnaufacture is making good vehicles today, the only real
    differance amoung them is style, price and dealer service. I have not owmed
    a foreign car that was any better than the dometics I've owned. The only
    differace I have encounted was the higher prices charged at foreign dealers
    Today I'm more interested in how the deaership takes care of me when I take
    my cars in for service. ;)



    mike hunt







    I do beleive that GM and Ford does a great job in
     
    Mike Hunter, Apr 3, 2006
  8. Frater Oconulux 11°

    The Bishop Guest

    "Of course, each job that is unskilled or less skilled but somehow
    undesirable in some other way must be evaluated individually for
    'proper' compensation. The true test is whether the wages for a
    particular job can be justified and sustained in a competitive world
    market. It's my contention that the jobs we're largely discussing
    here (UAW workers) do not meet that competitive market test."

    No. You are lying. That is not the true test. The ONLY true test is,
    can a person working forty hours a week at the pay you're considering
    provide a middle-class lifestyle for a family of four? If not, you're
    underpaying. Society exists for the 98% of people who are workers, not
    for the 2% who are owners. Your "argument" is just a thinly veiled
    argument for the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. It
    wasn't just when unions were formed, and it isn't just now.

    "Let me bring up an anecdotal example I'm aware of...."

    (Translation: Let me make up a pie-in-the-sky hypothetical to bolster
    my weak point.)

    "A "local" company (non-Union) found that their 'unskilled' workforce
    was grossly overpaid (25% or more) when compared to similar jobs in
    the area. Management, faced with fierce international competition
    (even within the same company) had to make adjustments in several
    areas -- not just wages -- to either become competitive or close
    down. They went to the employees and told them that wages would be
    frozen until further notice in order to save the plant and their
    jobs. Since this is a non-union plant, they were able to do it,
    keeping the plant going, so that everyone was able to keep their
    jobs. It's been 4 years and the plant is still there. Not many
    have left and they're almost to the point of being competitive."

    Did management take a pay cut? Not likely.
    Did they end sweetheart deals?
    Did management take the bus to work instead of limos? Not likely.
    What were considered similar jobs? (In NYC, we have registered nurses
    being told to their faces that their work is no more technical or
    skilled than that of a candy-striper.)
    On top of all this, many union shops have made EXACTLY the sort of
    concession you describe since 9/11. So really, a shop being fairly
    represented doesn't make the diference you say it makes.
    I hope your check from the GOP is in the mail; you've earned it.

    "A union shop, faced with the same choice, would have most likely
    chosen differently -- and all would have been out of work making
    nothing by now."

    This is simply fabrication. By now, SO many unions have conceded SO
    much, to the auto industry, the airlines, etc.--that this simply holds
    no water. And do these concessions lead to more prudent management?
    Well, here's my anecdote...

    After 9/11, the airlines cried poverty and asked for a $15 billion
    bailout. The main point of this gift, they said, was to avoid layoffs.
    The VERY FIRST thing they did with the money was vote themselves fat
    raises. The very NEXT thing they did with our tax money was--hire a PR
    firm to make the THIRD thing they did---lay off a whole lot of
    workers--look more sympathetic in the press.

    You were saying about it all being the damn greedy unions fault...?
     
    The Bishop, Apr 3, 2006
  9. Frater Oconulux 11°

    mark_digital Guest

    I guess we'll all have to go back to living in 4 family houses with our
    adult married kids like the old days. We'll have to learn all over again
    how to get along.
    wow, we've come full circle. how nostalgic.
     
    mark_digital, Apr 3, 2006
  10. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Lee Florack Guest

    In a free market, I think it's a good idea to buy the best product
    at the best price from whoever makes it. If all things were equal,
    I'd be ecstatic to buy American again. I used to buy GM (Chevy and
    Buick) until I realized that I was spending way too much for the
    cars -- both to purchase and maintain -- them for the quality I was
    getting. So, after many, many years of GM purchases, about 5 years
    ago, I started buying Honda/Acura. The quality is exponentially
    better while the cost is normally less -- or a similar price with
    much higher value.

    For those who think we should just "Buy American" no matter what,
    consider that the advantage of buying for the best value is that it
    rewards those who are able to provide the better products. Those
    who aren't able to do that, either get better or go out of business.
    We as consumers then get better value for our money because of
    reasonable competition.

    Buying inferior vehicles for too much money just so we can buy
    American is not -- in the long run -- the best thing to do for us
    personally or for us as Americans.
     
    Lee Florack, Apr 3, 2006
  11. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Jeff Guest

    About 20% less diesel for the same amount of energy.
    http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/clean_vehicles/dieseldilemma_exsum.pdf
    Or we will learn to use renewable fuels.

    Jeff
     
    Jeff, Apr 4, 2006
  12. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Jeff Guest

    I wish that I never heard the name Bush already.

    Jeff
     
    Jeff, Apr 4, 2006
  13. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Mike Hunter Guest

    I guess that is OK if imports were actually better, as you seem to believe,
    and if you don't have children who might need a job some day. Your
    experience is the opposite of mine. I was buying imports then switched to
    domestics because the imports were costing to me too much to buy and
    maintain.


    mike hunt
     
    Mike Hunter, Apr 4, 2006
  14. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Jeff Guest

    When was Barry Goldwater President?
     
    Jeff, Apr 4, 2006
  15. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Mike Hunter Guest

    Get real what renewable fuel can possobley take the place of gasolene in the
    near future? Renewables may up take care of some ot the growing need but
    will not take the place of gasoline in the next 50 years, even if we had
    started ten years ago LOL


    mike hunt
     
    Mike Hunter, Apr 4, 2006
  16. Frater Oconulux 11°

    dizzy Guest

    No matter how you spin it, you're a bald-faced liar, "Mike".
     
    dizzy, Apr 4, 2006
  17. Frater Oconulux 11°

    dizzy Guest

    No, they did not, you bald-faced liar. And Toyota is no more an
    "import" to the entire world than GM and Ford are.
    Not obvious at all, dumbshit. As has already been explained to you
    countless times, most people don't buy what they consider to be the
    "best vehicles". They buy what they can afford, based on perceived
    value and often, yes, a strong bias for "the home team".
     
    dizzy, Apr 4, 2006
  18. Frater Oconulux 11°

    R Sweeney Guest

    Prius saves 620 gallons per 100K of driving.
    So if you log 40K per year, you STILL need 18 years of driving to break even
    @ $3/gal.
     
    R Sweeney, Apr 4, 2006
  19. Frater Oconulux 11°

    R Sweeney Guest

    1 large nuclear power plant can power a lot of cars
     
    R Sweeney, Apr 4, 2006
  20. Frater Oconulux 11°

    dizzy Guest

    I bet it will.
    Bullshit.
     
    dizzy, Apr 4, 2006
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.