R.I.P. General Motors (1931-2006)

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Frater Oconulux 11°, Mar 31, 2006.

  1. Considering that we are about six trillion dollars in debt, it is
    pretty clear that giving the government more money than it needs isn't
    a problem. If your point is that the government spends too much money
    on stupid things, I would have to agree and point to the trillion
    dollars we are dumping down the Iraqi shithole as a prime example.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Apr 4, 2006
  2. Here is my source. Where is yours?

    http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060104/auto_sales_table.html?.v=2

    DC sold about 2% more cars than Toyota last year (2,304,833 vs
    2,260,296) but their market share was virtually identical.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Apr 4, 2006
  3. Gee, and I previously posted:

    a difference of about 44,500 vehicles. Isn't it funny how we are so
    close on our figures and Mike Hunt is so far off.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Apr 4, 2006
  4. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Mike Guest

    I see english isn't you're native language, sorry about that.
     
    Mike, Apr 4, 2006
  5. Frater Oconulux 11°

    w_tom Guest

    I should have stated the expression clearer. In each case (barring
    one), the company only dabbled in bankruptcy to return intact.
    Employees (many) still had their jobs. In the one rare case where a
    company went into bankruptcy and little came out - Enron - the
    condition was due to extraordinary flagrant fraud. One example among
    thousands means, for all practical purposes, the number of complete
    bankruptcy is near zero. Either a company recovers intact (although
    changed) OR a company is consumed by another or others.

    The point is that GM will remain. Will it remain like AT&T -
    constantly downsized and destroying American jobs? Will it
    disintegrate by selling off its divisions like DEC? Will it simply be
    merged into another profitable company like Lucent? In each case,
    bankruptcy only forces management to act in company interests - not in
    executive interests.

    Large companies don't terminate in bankruptcy. They get merged,
    sold, distributed among other companies, or revised. Contrarian
    examples are so rare as to be virtually zero. GM will remain. The
    only question is HOW it will remain. In GM's case, because so many
    previously attempted to sell off parts of GM and discovered that was
    not possible, then most likely GM will simply be reorganized. Taxpayer
    will pay for those $billions that GM failed to put into pension funds
    so that management would claim 1990s profits that never really existed.
    Another example of corporate welfare complete with golden parachutes
    for those who were criminally negligent as executives.
     
    w_tom, Apr 4, 2006
  6. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Collector Guest


    ....and that's a fact jack...GM has become so bloated
    that it seems the org is more interested in cash flow rather
    that selling quality cars...

    ....no decent autos...no cash flow...now the workers are
    to become victum's of coprate greed and insuffiency...
    they will be thrown away like an old pair of brown shoes...

    ....and the japs laugh their asses off to the bank...then there's
    the koreans...and soon the chinese...

    ....i just bought a cool pair of converse chuck taylor all
    stars...made??...shit....china...

    ....bush is a dick....

    peace
     
    Collector, Apr 4, 2006
  7. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Collector Guest

    ....damn fine point...cheaper to send the parts to china...than in USA...
    then consumers are charged premium sticker prices...

    ....**** all that air-pollution devices they stuff upon the
    autos...ethenol is the answer...put all the US farmers
    back to producing (so we wouldn't have to buy a fucking
    orange from across the continent)...ethenol is clean
    burning...sure they can adjust the carboration system
    to accomodate the fuel...and maybe even get cheaper
    booze...

    ....now...don't get me wrong...the japs build fine autos...
    i have '94 toyota 4cyl. pick-up....93k miles...and it ain't
    even 'broken-in' yet...

    ....think GM can produce that??...FORD is close...CHRYSLER
    is still up in the air...maybe revive the Delorean??...289 Mustang,
    327 Camero/Firebird...shit 'merican auto maufacturers have
    just about completely fucked it all up...

    ....i feel it will come to a point where peeps are gonna grab old 60's
    early 70's muscle cars and restrore them (well, as much as
    possible)...

    ....i am beginning to see more and more 50 year old VW bugs on
    the road...owned 2...trashed..but those fuckers ran like the wind...

    peace
     
    Collector, Apr 4, 2006
  8. Frater Oconulux 11°

    mark_digital Guest

    What do you mean"take care of you"? Special treatment?
    mark_
     
    mark_digital, Apr 4, 2006


  9. It comes down to the application of culture. For far too long, fat
    nonproductive labor contracts entered into by the "big three" along with
    a corporate culture of mediocrity have taken their toll.

    When one learns that some yokel can earn as much as $70 per hour as an
    assembler, something is very wrong.

    Sometimes, you don't get what you pay for...

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, Apr 4, 2006

  10. News Flash!!!

    The original AT&T is no longer. It (the unprofitable remains) were
    purchased by SBC which then changed its name to the "new" at&t. SBC, a
    former baby Bell was worth far more than the original AT&T...




    Really?

    Evidently you have forgotten about Eastern Airlines, Pan Am, W.T. Grant
    and a host of others.

    Nice try but no cigar!

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, Apr 4, 2006


  11. Ain't that the truth... Putting off the inevitable just increases the
    cost it must finally be faced.

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, Apr 4, 2006
  12. Frater Oconulux 11°

    DH Guest

    Sure. And paying execs literally hundreds of millions to make bad decisions
    has nothing to do with GMs decline into second place worldwide.



    *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
    *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
     
    DH, Apr 4, 2006
  13. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Mike Hunter Guest

    AT&T does indeed still exist. ;)
     
    Mike Hunter, Apr 4, 2006
  14. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Cool Jet Guest

    Sigvaldi Eggertsson (sigvaldiATbinetDOTis)
    from Reykjavik, Iceland
    Nor is it his fault that you are follically challenged and suffering
    from penis envy. Having said that, you are to be commended for coming
    to the realization that the language spoken in Iceland has changed very
    little since the island was settled, some 11 centuries ago. Icelandic
    and Faroese are the only Scandinavian languages to have kept the
    complicated inflection system of the Old Norse spoken during the Viking
    age. Not exactly the language of International Commerce, is it Mr.
    Eggertson? While there are many in Iceland who speak the Swedish
    language, most, like yourself, have come to the realization that you
    have to speak English to put food on the table. Well done Mr.
    Eggertsson.

    It is nice to see that you have broadened your horizons by moving on
    from your discussion of the Christmas grouse shortage on Iceland
    wherein you told the world that you "always thought the bird was called
    "Ptarmigan" not Grouse."

    Then, of course, there was your informative post "Well, Iceland is
    south of the arctic circle so it gets dark in the summer and there is
    light in the winter. Your description fits North Norway and Northern
    Canada etc. far better."

    It was also interesting to find Anagrams of names of posters to one of
    the groups you belong to:
    "Sigvaldi Eggertsson = Voltage singes grids.
    Even if so, it's not clear whether he's actually evil:
    ~'s big devil? Saint?
    All the same, I don't know if I'd want to spend an evening with him:
    Sigvaldi Eggertsson ~ digs revolting gases."

    Now that was some intellectual group Sigvaldi! You seem to excel as a
    master of the mundane. Your knowledge of obscure trivia is exceeded
    only by my lack of interest in such nonsense.

    The world is indeed a small place Mr. Eggertsson. You would undoubtedly
    enjoy it more by availing yourself of a hair impant and a penile
    implant from your pet cat. ;-) And leave the serious discussions to
    those who haven't spent their life in the dark!
     
    Cool Jet, Apr 4, 2006
  15. Frater Oconulux 11°

    John Horner Guest


    It is also instructive to look at the history of the British motor
    industry, once a powerhouse, and now essentially gone except for
    transplants. Quality issues, management mistakes and agressive unions
    all joined forces to completely eliminate British owned auto makers from
    the face of the planet (unless you count boutiques like Morgan).

    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 4, 2006
  16. Frater Oconulux 11°

    John Horner Guest

    If you are saying that GM circa 2016 will still exist in the same way as
    which AT&T still exists in 2006 then you might be on to something.

    SBC bought the struggling remains of AT&T and chose to rename itself
    AT&T due to the higher consumer brand recognition for the AT&T name.

    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 4, 2006
  17. Frater Oconulux 11°

    sigvald Guest

    Wow, so you can both read and use Google, that is astonishing!
     
    sigvald, Apr 4, 2006
  18. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Jason Guest

    John,
    One of the Japanese car companies might buy the stuggling remains of GM
    and keep making the best selling models--however, those cars will have the
    same sorts of engines that they use in their Japanese cars. In other
    words, the same sort of thing that happened to Chrysler MAY happen to GM.
    However, for the sake of the American workers--I hope that GM does NOT go
    out of business.
    Jason
     
    Jason, Apr 4, 2006
  19. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Bob Palmer Guest

    I do beleive that GM and Ford does a great job in
    I don't really see a trend towards GM and Ford making better pickups. They
    make their vehicles bigger and heavier with larger, more thirstier engines
    to tweak male egos. The large amount of sales of these vehicles reflects
    mainly the fleet sales. Everyone I know that owns GM, Ford or Dodge pickups
    have had some major problems. Not to mention the side-saddle gas tanks for
    GM, the poor rating of the previous generation of Ford F150 in crash tests,
    the 8 MPG Dodge pickups and the crushing of the cabs in rollover crashes of
    all three. Lawsuits from the latter are adding to the price of their
    product.
     
    Bob Palmer, Apr 4, 2006
  20. Frater Oconulux 11°

    Bob Palmer Guest

    One of the other factors that I don't believe anyone has mentioned is
    If you are a tv watcher, watch the show "The Amazing Race." It takes you all
    over the world and shows pictures of what is being driven. The two things I
    noticed in just about every country are (1) There are very few pickups on
    the road if any and (2) there are virtually no Big 3 built vehicles driven
    anywhere.
     
    Bob Palmer, Apr 4, 2006
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.