Well, dumbass, once again you're wrong: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/prewarn Prewarn \Pre*warn"\, v. t. & i. [imp. & p. p. Prewarned; p. pr. & vb. n. Prewarning.] To warn beforehand; to forewarn. [R.] Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc. No be a man and apologize to Tony. Let's see what you're *really* made of...[/QUOTE] Oh yeah, wikis and online "dictionaries" are what I base my life on, sure. No apology required, because there's no such word as "prewarn".
In a pack is the least of the times I want to drive fast. I generally drive fast during the times that the cops don't mind. If I am driving late at night or on a road with little to no traffic, I drive a bit faster. On a busier highway, I stick to 5-7 over the limit, and the police are fine with that. I drive an 06 Si, am 35 years old, and have never had a speeding ticket. Not that it won't happen eventually, but I try hard to drive with some common sense, and it seems to work...
You obviously have an IQ in the single digits or else are deficient in the English language, if you can not express yourself without resorting to name calling and the use of profanities. So, in order for you to comprehend my meaning, stop wasting my bandwidth you fucking moron. Stop the **** from posting meaningles, useless bullshit. DaveD
To those fine folks who answered the question I asked, thanks for the good advice and suggestions! To the rest of you sophomores-- OK children, recess is over, go back to your homerooms now...
Good point. There's a 10 mile stretch of westbound I-20 about 35 miles east of Birmingham, AL where the S/L is 55 for no reason other than so the local cops can bag "speeders". The S/L on either side of this speed trap is 70 and the road there is wide, in good repair, has gentle curves and hills only.
around my neck of the woods, slowing down to the posted limit would cause a 50 vehicle pile-up - and that's /really/ not intelligent.
take that up with the feds. i understand that there have been a whole bunch of these kinds of "local economy boosters" that have been eliminated in ca and nv. apparently, there's some kind of law against arbitrary local authority speed limits, and there's a "percentage of local income" economic test applied when scrutinizing.
You don't think my post was accurate, and truthful? You think it's just fine for idiots to go blasting down the highway endangering the rest of us because they want to? Is that what you believe, you ignorant ****? **** off and die, dimwit.
sorry dude, it's not bullshit. you're just so enraged in your argument with dave, you're not thinking straight. come to the san francisco bay area. 580 oakland is posted 55. if you go much slower than 80 outside of rush hour, you'll cause an accident. it's 4 lanes, bumper to bumper. rush hour is slower - about 35. 280 is posted 65 and 80 is the rule. if you drive the 15 into las vegas from l.a. on a friday night, that's posted 65 and prevailing is about 95. that's bumper to bumper too.
Wrong. I'm not "enraged" about anything. You apparently are, which may explain your need to speed on the highways. It's called "road rage". More bullshit. I lived in Alameda for 6 years, and frequently went to S.F. I also go to Vegas at least 6-8 times a year, and that's just not the truth. Keep trying to rationalize your speeding, though.
Speeding is not road rage. Some people are quite calm at 10+ over the limit. Speeding is speeding. Driving angry as a result of something another driver did or you perceive they did, is road rage. I can't speak to those roads, but I-80 in NJ, if you're not keeping up with traffic you are causing a problem.
My living depends on my licence being perfectly clean. It has been for over twenty five years now, I'm not about to change the way I drive because of any reasons, political or not.