rear brakes

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by cinerama, Sep 26, 2006.

  1. cinerama

    cinerama Guest

    Sorry guys. I just finished talking to the Honda dealer. She was got
    the pads and shoes mixed up. I have 60% left on the front and 66% left
    on the back brakes.
     
    cinerama, Sep 26, 2006
    #1
  2. cinerama

    loewent via CarKB.com Guest

    Your back brakes will last a lot longer than the fronts.

    My 98 civic didn't need rear replacements on the shoes until about 225000kms

    t
     
    loewent via CarKB.com, Sep 26, 2006
    #2
  3. cinerama

    Elle Guest

    I think all the shops do for the rear shoes (and probably
    front pads) is a crude, ruler measurement of the linings
    (shoes and pads). That's what I do when I check my brakes.
    That 66% is just a guesstimate. Sounds like all's normal
    brake lining-wise on your car to me.
     
    Elle, Sep 26, 2006
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. 1998 accord rear brakes question - URGENT

  2. Rear disk brakes

  3. chirpy rear brakes on 98 Civic sedan

  4. 2000 accord SE - rear drum brakes self-adjusting ?

  5. chirping rear brakes on 98 civic

  6. '97 Civic; Rear brakes "screeching" and a noisy timing belt...

  7. 2002 Accord Rear Brakes

  8. New Odyssey - first time I apply brakes in morning I hear "clack", "clack" from rear brakes - should

Loading...