Shell's new "nitrogen" gasolin

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by P J, Mar 14, 2009.

  1. P J

    P J Guest

    Shell is promoting its new nitrogenized gasoline as an engine cleaning
    formula. Anybody knows if this is for real and how nitrogen could
    accomplish that? I've been favoring Chevron for its techron content for
    the same reason.
    pj
     
    P J, Mar 14, 2009
    #1
  2. P J

    jim beam Guest

    i started keeping fuel logs a few years ago, and indeed, averages for
    shell are better than chevron, the other one i've run extensively.

    but i have no idea about this nitrogen thing though. some interesting
    blog comments here:
    http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=4285994&postid=55935549
     
    jim beam, Mar 14, 2009
    #2
  3. I can't speak for the nitrogenized gasoline, but I started using Shell
    several years ago, based on their cleaning claims. I discovered that
    whatever it was, Shell gas was cheaper to run than other fuels.

    I started with a few tanks of their Ultra, with extra cleaners, to get
    things clean (this was a 94 Lexus with 130K miles on it). Then I
    switched to their 87 octane, and ran nothing but that. I was getting
    better mileage than I did on other fuels, and even accounting for the
    fact that the Shell was a bit more expensive to buy, it was cheaper to
    run.

    go figure. I think their claims are legit--but they were so even before
    claiming this "nitrogenized" fuel.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Mar 14, 2009
    #3
  4. P J

    P J Guest

    Hm, interesting. And I thought Chevron was the way to go.
    I hope it's not a kind of gimmick like those claims about magnets around
    fuel lines. ;-)
    I noticed though that Shell also uses up to 10% ethanol in its gas which
    is said to reduce fuel efficiency, so it's even more puzzling how they
    can achieve better overall milage than other main brands.
    pj
     
    P J, Mar 14, 2009
    #4
  5. P J

    jim beam Guest

    the key to understanding is knowing the difference between "up to 10%"
    and "is 10%".
     
    jim beam, Mar 14, 2009
    #5
  6. Hm, interesting. And I thought Chevron was the way to go.[/QUOTE]

    We don't have Chevron around here, so I have no way of knowing.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Mar 14, 2009
    #6
  7. P J

    Paul Guest

    Pretty much all gas in the Houston area seems to be 10% ethanol.
     
    Paul, Mar 15, 2009
    #7
  8. P J

    P J Guest

    Point taken. I better check the posted label more closely next time at
    gas stations. Perhaps Arco's label does say 10%. I'm actually surprised
    that government allows such vague labeling as "up to 10%." What might be
    next? This gasoline's octane rating may be up to 89?
    pj
     
    P J, Mar 15, 2009
    #8
  9. P J

    Larry in AZ Guest

    They allow it because the amount of additives changes according to the
    season.
     
    Larry in AZ, Mar 15, 2009
    #9

  10. I can't see how any sort of dissolved free nitrogen would do squat for
    cleaning. I'd think that the air would provide plenty... ;)

    Shell's site is full of typical idiot-level Dancing Bologna and says
    nothing of consequence.

    Amines have long been used in the better anti-deposit additives.
    Although a very complex family of compounds, all amines use a nitrogen
    atom as a foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amines This is
    hardly bleeding edge tech...

    I suspect nothing is new, except for the dumb ad campaign. (OK, maybe
    they increased the amount of 'stuff' in their mix by 2%...)

    -Humbug!
     
    Greg Campbell, Mar 15, 2009
    #10
  11. We discussed this extensively on an RV newsgroup and came to pretty
    much the same conclusions. Nitrogen gas is going to do nothing and the
    Shell website about there new gasoline is almost completely free of
    content.

    Several knowledgeable posters suggested it was probably just an
    additive -- probably a nitrogen compound such as nitrotoluene or
    nitrobenzene. These can act as powerful solvents and also would tend
    to raise the octane number.



    Elliot Richmond
    Itinerant astronomy teacher
     
    Elliot Richmond, Mar 15, 2009
    #11

  12. Why do you think 'nitrogen' means nitrogen in a gaseous form? The
    facts are you have no idea what you are talking about. Sure, Shell
    does not reveal what nitrogen based additive is the basis of their
    claim but that does not make their claim invalid. Until you have some
    facts to share, why not keep quiet?
     
    Edward W. Thompson, Mar 16, 2009
    #12
  13. P J

    jim beam Guest


    usenet has no barriers to entry dude. anybody can just show up and
    evidence their ignorance, non-analytical thinking and herd-like fear of
    their unknown.
     
    jim beam, Mar 16, 2009
    #13
  14. P J

    Dan C Guest

    Very true. Just look at nearly any of the posts made by 'jim beam' to
    confirm this.
     
    Dan C, Mar 16, 2009
    #14
  15. P J

    jim beam Guest

    **** you, hypocrite. you never contribute a goddamned thing except "buy
    a new fucking car asshole".
     
    jim beam, Mar 16, 2009
    #15
  16. P J

    Dan C Guest

    "Your Honor, the defense rests."
     
    Dan C, Mar 16, 2009
    #16
  17. When one says "nitrogen." that's what one means. Nitrogen is an
    element. In gaseous form and standard temperature and pressure, it is
    a molecule formed of two nitrogen atoms joined by a double covalent
    bond. In this form it is relatively unreactive. The atmosphere is
    about 78% nitrogen.
    I have some idea of what I am talking about.
    They did not say nitrogen based additive, they said "nitrogen
    enriched."

    Here is a tinyurl link to their page supposed "explaining" this new
    gasoline.

    http://tinyurl.com/6p5gn7

    I could not find any use of the words "nitrogen based additive" or
    "nitrogen compound" or "nitrogenated hydrocarbon."
    My guess was clearly speculation. Having facts and keeping quiet have
    never been standard operating procedure for Usenet. It certainly has
    not hindered anybody posting to this group in the several years I have
    been reading it, and occasionally contributing.

    However, I stand by my guess of nitrobenzene or something similar.
    Nitrobenzene is an effective solvent, it is relatively inexpensive, it
    mixes with water and gasoline, it would raise the octane number, and
    is not known to be carcinogenic.



    Elliot Richmond
    Itinerant astronomy teacher
     
    Elliot Richmond, Mar 16, 2009
    #17
  18. WTF??

    Until you can 'contribute' without taking shots at people, why don't YOU
    STFU?

    You sound an awful lot like our resident Rabid Net Kook, JB. Are you
    one of his sock puppets?
     
    Greg Campbell, Mar 16, 2009
    #18
  19. P J

    Paul Guest

    The Houston Chronicle quotes Shell this way:

    "Nitrogen is a key element of the active cleaning molecule in the new fuel,
    making it significantly more stable at higher temperatures common in modern
    engines, such as direct fuel-injection gasoline engines. The increased
    stability ensures that the molecule can work under much tougher engine
    conditions by resisting thermal breakdown better than conventional cleaning
    additives."

    To me, this says the additive they're talking about CONTAINS nitrogen, not
    that it IS nitrogen.
     
    Paul, Mar 16, 2009
    #19
  20. P J

    jim beam Guest

    as does your ability to contribute constructively. just look at your sig.
     
    jim beam, Mar 17, 2009
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.