shift stick drivers

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Rattus The RAT, Jun 18, 2005.

  1. Rattus The RAT

    jim beam Guest

    my point exactly. thank you.
     
    jim beam, Jun 25, 2005
    #21
  2. Rattus The RAT

    Pars Guest

    Perhaps on the race track,but when you need to make a quick getaway into a
    opening in the freeway and want to burn some clutch to add to the drama (and
    don't have a big engine torque monster to compensate or a lighweight bike) a
    1-2 downshift from a sequential would just take away from the fun. Or, your
    crawling along in traffic, see a sweat opening, slam the shifter into first,
    pop the clutch, tear some rubber and by the time you've completely released
    the clutch, you've already capture your spot (and eliminated the need for
    the woman behind you to try and box you out). If you're in a take no
    prisoner attitude, the clutchless sequential shift seems a little too tame
    (especially when you don't have some serious power under the hood and need
    to use the tranny to make do).

    Pars
     
    Pars, Jun 25, 2005
    #22
  3. Rattus The RAT

    jim beam Guest

    there's not much "fun" anyway - all you're doing is pressing the little
    buttons on the steering wheel. formula 1 stylee. personally, i can't
    wait to get my hands on that stuff.
     
    jim beam, Jun 25, 2005
    #23
  4. As a committed MT fan, I would certainly be open to trying one of
    these. If it works for F1, it might just work on the street. I
    especially applaud if this replaces the AT one is now forced to accept
    if one wants a car that can handle the Home Depot/people
    hauler/camping missions.

    I know exactly what you mean. As for sequential shifter, you just
    gotta try it and see. It could be pretty good. Imagine, you at in
    5th and you see the opening. You simultaneously hold down the
    downshift lever and floor the gas. That signals the tranny to shift
    down to the lowest practical gear. 0.2 seconds after you give the
    command, you are accelerating as fast as the traction/horsepower
    permit.

    FIA made Honda slow down the shifting of their F1 transmission because
    it was essentially seamless with virtually instantaneous shifts which
    is not permitted.

     
    Gordon McGrew, Jun 26, 2005
    #24
  5. Rattus The RAT

    jim beam Guest

    .... [drool]
    now /this/ is what technology is all about. who would want to drive a
    stick if you could have this? i remember some f1 drivers turning their
    noses up at electronic shifting. i think it took 2, maybe 3 races of
    getting dusted to change their minds. certainly not a full season.

    i love f1. without doubt, and by a gigantic margin, the biggest single
    driver of automobile innovation that there is.
     
    jim beam, Jun 26, 2005
    #25
  6. Rattus The RAT

    Pars Guest

    Nice option, but any regular automatic can do the same thing... But, 0.2 sec
    is quick, it'd probably take me about 1.0 sec and that's with both foot
    (right foot to punch the gas in order to rev match) and the right hand going
    into action at the same time. The GM's tend to have a nice kick down when at
    open throttle, but it still takes the transmission about 1/2 sec to take
    action after being floored. So, 0.2 sec is freakin fast! A potential cool
    feature would be to simultaneaously hold up on the shift while completely
    off the gas, which may allow the tranny to go back into the most econimcal
    gear. That way, it'd simulate a MT ability to drastcally go down to the most
    aggresive gear and immiately upshift to a cruising gear (great for short
    burst of powers while negoiating the highway and maximizing on fuel
    consumption).

    Pars
     
    Pars, Jun 26, 2005
    #26
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.