Shocks?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Deric4eyes, Aug 19, 2003.

  1. Deric4eyes

    Deric4eyes Guest

    Hi All. I have a 1991 Accord EX. I live in NYC and the roads aren't great.
    But sometimes, I feel the ride is kinda rough when I hit uneven pavement,
    like those with bumps and stuff. I've sat in other cars and I get this
    feeling that mine is extra-rough. I have 97K miles. Bought the car used at
    71K and haven't changed the shocks and springs. The ride feels fine on the
    high-way unless I hit a pothole or something. When I do the test where you
    push down on the corners, it feels fine to me. But I don't know what's
    "bad", so how can I tell? How much would it cost approximately, to change
    the shocks? Do I need to change the springs too? Thanks!

    Deric...
     
    Deric4eyes, Aug 19, 2003
    #1
  2. Deric4eyes

    pars Guest

    I find that the Tockico & Pro-Kit combo works great against pot-holes.

    Pars
     
    pars, Aug 19, 2003
    #2
  3. Deric4eyes

    93 Fox Guest

    "When I do the test where you push down on the corners, it feels fine to
    me. "

    It's not supposed to 'feel fine.' The test is: push down hard and release,
    if the car rebounds (bounces) more than once, the shock absorber needs
    replacing. The cost can vary, depending on the brand of shock obsorber you
    use... I'd say anywhere from $350 up (plus labor if you don't wanna do it
    yourself) for all 4.
     
    93 Fox, Aug 19, 2003
    #3
  4. No doink sounds from the suspension when you get in or out of the car? In
    the frost belt broken springs is a common complaint so if you do replace
    the shocks also replace the springs. I don't think the push on the corner
    test tells much about the condition of the shocks. When you drive on a
    road with distinct undulations do you get a feeling that the car is
    bouncing afer each undulation?

    Another good test for worn shocks is to brake moderately hard on a rippled
    surface - shouldn't be hard to find approaching many traffic lights in NYC
    and NJ.:) If you feel that the tires are skipping over the tops of the
    ripples and increasing your stopping distance badly compared with a smooth
    road, that's a good sign of worn shocks.

    Note also that Hondas tend to have a firmer ride than many competitive
    models in the same category, e.g. Camry is a much cushier ride than an
    Accord.

    Rgds, George Macdonald

    "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??
     
    George Macdonald, Aug 19, 2003
    #4
  5. Deric4eyes

    JoeBeets Guest

    Sadly, shocks seem to start losing their cushioning effect at around 20 K
    mi, and are ready for replacement at 60 K, if you can afford it.

    The push-the-bumper-down test is bogus, as you can easily verify with a new
    car :)
     
    JoeBeets, Aug 21, 2003
    #5
  6. Deric4eyes

    93 Fox Guest

    No, the test is not bogus... do you actually know what the test is?

    Push hard; see if the corner rebounds more than once. If so, the shock
    absorbers are worn and could use replacing. IF you see a new car that
    rebounds more than once, there is a problem. If pushing on the car causes
    multiple rebounds, then just think what driving it would be like (really
    bouncy).
     
    93 Fox, Aug 23, 2003
    #6
  7. Deric4eyes

    Misterbeets Guest

    I hear ya, but what I'm saying is, an old car will pass the bumper test,
    will in fact be indistinguishable from a new car in this respect, but will
    have a much worse ride over a pothole filled road. It is plausible though.
    You *want* to believe it. I used to believe it until I actually tried it,
    then I realized it likely sprang from some car advice column, providing
    "helpful" advice for an unsophisticated readership. It got passed along like
    an Urban Legend.

    BTW, not surprising, since shocks have very little damping effect at "bumper
    pushing" speeds, at least compared to the total damping that occurs from all
    other components--springs, bushings, etc. I'm fairly certain this test would
    not even detect a missing shock. Someone please try this and let us know :)

    Rant follows: Furthermore, since their resistance, and hence ability to
    absorb energy, increases with velocity, the "shock" in shock absorber is
    *not* a misnomer, not inferior to "damper", as is sometimes claimed, but a
    very apt term.

    And I especially don't believe the high dollar shocks last any longer; at
    least not long enough to justify the money, compared to OEM quality. But
    neither am I surpised that they sell so well. Better to spend half as much
    and change them twice as often :)
    --
     
    Misterbeets, Aug 25, 2003
    #7
  8. Deric4eyes

    alan Guest

    Ummm, I don't think springs have damping. Bushings might have a little
    if they are soft.
    The other thing I might want to mention is that if you try to push just
    one corner of the car, the motion is going to couple into the other
    shocks as well. So I wonder if you can really tell if just that one
    shock is bad. I suppose if both front or both rear are bad, you can
    press down in the middle of the bumper and it won't couple into the
    other wheels.

    So if the bounce test is no good, how are you suppose to tell if your
    shocks went bad? My bro sez that my shocks feel under-damped, but the
    car does fine on the bounce test.
     
    alan, Aug 25, 2003
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.