Some ruminations on antifreeze

Sorry, you're wrong. There is hard data. *GM* admits this in a variety
of FACTORY bulletins concerning issues with contamination from solder
flash, factory sealers, and even contamination from simple air in the
systems. Aside from the factory issues that they own up to, they claim
that the "air in the system" problem is poor maintenance on the part
of owners who let the coolant level get too low. Probably true, but
I've never see that problem with any other anti-freeze. FWIW, the
problems appear to be with DEXcool/Havoline only, not all carbo
organic acid products. YMMV. Use at your own risk.

Also, folks here seem to be grouping anti-freeze into only
two categories. There are actually 3 or 4 major categories. One is
the EG w/high silicate products that are not recommended (by most
manufacturers) in any recent vehicle. Next are the EG Hybrid Organic
Acid Technology products like Valvoline G05. These are recommended by
Ford, Chrysler/Damlier, and some European manufacturers. They contain
low (not no) silicate, and low or no phosphate. They are an easy
conversion from EG products without a lot of contamination issues.
Last are the Carbo Organic Acid products like Dexcool. These are
no-silicate and no-phosphate but may have some problems (Dexcool
definitely has problems). Conversion requires a serious flush and
contamination is a major concern. There is a fourth category -
the Nissan/Honda no silicate products. I haven't been able to find
an MSDS on these so I can't tell you exactly what they are composed
of. I suspect they are a HOAT but I don't know what the anti-corrosion
package is.

Don't read a lot into actual colors, they are not that definitive.

 

I see no reason that changing the additive package couldn't have a huge
effect on how the coolant behaves in a closed system. I've seen pictures
of the insides of engines (GM engines for which the crap was recommended
and nothing else ever used) filled with the muddy residue. Links to them
have been posted on this newsgroup (rec.autos.tech, which is where I'm
reading this).

 

You've done a good job reviewing the AF picture. It is unfortuate that it
has gotten so unbelievably complicated confused. I think the car mfgs have
decided to reap some money out of this confusion by relabeling common AFs
with their labels and charging double.

Again, I think most of the hysteria is urban legend and blaming AF on other
problems. Put any AF in a couple million vehicles, some with serious engine
and cooling system problems, and you're going to have a few that look pretty
bad. The same thing occured with synthetic oil and it's occuring with AF.

Installed properly and changed regulary, use whatever you like and the
chances of problems is vanishingly small. Just like oil.

- Mark

 

No question of that. Most of them are rather tight-lipped as to
what exactly is in their "recommended" coolant.

Sorry, but with Dexcool, I have to disagree. There are known problems.
They are admitted to by GM, it's primary promoter.

Cars with Dexcool have showed metal corrosion 2 years after leaving
the factory.

 

Put whatever you want in your engine you bought it.
they are additives that make me use the original Honda Fluids.

Change you antifreeze every 2 years what is that, about $20 Why spent 15 to
30 K for a vehicle and quiver about $10 bucks per year for antifreeze. Go
get an air cooled motorcycle instead.

 

I hate to continue the argument, but this doesn't mean crap. But any AF in
three million cars a year and some are going to show corrosion in two years.
Be reasonable.

The question is whether there is a higher incidence of corrosion issues with
Dexcool. Everything else is STRICTLY ANECDOTAL.

- Mark

 

There is also propylene glycol based anti freeze. PG is non-toxic.