Special Oils

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by spaceaze, Apr 19, 2005.

  1. spaceaze

    spaceaze Guest

    I have a 92 Honda Accord LX with 181,000 miles.

    Is anyone using high milage or synthetic oils in thier high milage
    Hondas. Do these oils help extend the life of your vehicle?

    spaceaze
     
    spaceaze, Apr 19, 2005
    #1
  2. spaceaze

    Elle Guest

    Always good to review this topic once in awhile.

    I personally won't put synthetic into my 1991 Civic, 164k miles, because I
    have read and heard reports that the synthetic's effects are destructive to
    various engine oil seals.

    Others say not so.

    Keep checking back.
     
    Elle, Apr 19, 2005
    #2
  3. spaceaze

    disallow Guest

    from what i understand, synthetic doesn't
    destroy seals, but if you have used dino for a
    long time, and there is a lot of varnish and
    buildup on the seals, they dry out. Then, if
    you suddenly switch to synthetic, the synthetic
    washes away this sludge. Since the seals are
    dried out due to the above, they leak.

    I switched my 98 civic to synthetic at
    100000kms. I have a little seapage at my oil
    pan, but aside from that I NEVER have to add
    oil. My car has 220000kms on it now.

    t
     
    disallow, Apr 19, 2005
    #3
  4. spaceaze

    Pars Guest

    My thinking is, if an older engine can handle the high revs (and occasional
    redlines), without losing it's oil (or only about 1L per oil-change), the
    seals are probably good enough condition to handle the synthetic oil.
    However, if the older engine has never proven itself (always been babied),
    switching to synthetic is risky business. Note, Mobel-1's 10W30 is a blend
    is ment for older engine.

    I'm not sure about the previous model Civic or Accord, but for the 96 and
    up, 100000km can still be considered a newbie engine and shouldn't have any
    issues with the synthetic blend (assuming the engine has undergone regular
    maintenance).

    Pars
    98 Civic Hatch
     
    Pars, Apr 25, 2005
    #4
  5. spaceaze

    y_p_w Guest

    Old wives' tale told countless number of times over
    the internet. The problem is that the polyalphaolefin
    (PAO) base oil in many synthetic oils has a tendency to
    shrink seals. To counter that an ester base oil and/or
    seal swelling ingredients are added.

    Mobil had a huge problem with leaking with the original
    Mobil 1 because they didn't properly formulate it for
    seal compatibility.

    The other thing is that many of the "synthetic" oils
    sold today don't contain PAO, but a heavily processed
    petroleum oil. Most of what's sold (in the US) as
    Castrol Syntec, Valvoline SynPower, QS, Pennzoil
    are known to be Group III petroleum oils. It's
    debatable whether or not they're "synthetic", but they
    are a higher performance than what's sold as conventional
    oil. Mobil is about the only company that hasn't used
    a Group III oil and packaged it as a "full synthetic".
    With many older cars, the seals may be ready to leak.
    Add a little bit of a PAO oil and it could shrink a bit
    before the other ingredients soften up the seals again.
     
    y_p_w, Apr 25, 2005
    #5
  6. The ester *is* a swelling agent... and it's not impossible that there is
    some truth to the old wives tale. I believe the branched chain paraffins
    in all synthetics are somewhat more "mobile" liquids than petro basestocks.
    Yeah, we *think* Mobil is still using a true PAO as the principal
    ingredient:) - like many others, they truncated the info in their MSDSs a
    while back so the only way to know is to do the analysis... which I'm not
    sure anybody has done independently. BTW the hydrotreated petro-stocks
    sold as synthetic claim to have similar structure molecules as the real
    synthetics, so are likely to have a similar BuNa swell factor.
     
    George Macdonald, Apr 26, 2005
    #6
  7. spaceaze

    y_p_w Guest

    I've read that Group III base oils still don't have the performance
    of PAOs, including inherent cold temp, high temp, and viscosity
    index. Also - there seems to be a limit on how viscous a Group
    III oil can be without VI improver. PAOs and PAO/ester blends are
    reported to be available in a huge range of viscosities, although
    it's probably not that important in automotive engines.

    Mobil is still touting Mobil 1 as containing PAOs:

    <http://www.mobil1.com/USA-English/MotorOil/Oils/Oils_FAQs.aspx#Mobil_1_FAQs3>

    "Is Mobil 1 with SuperSyn Technology a fully synthetic motor oil?

    Yes, it is. To meet the demanding requirements of today's
    specifications (and our customers' expectations), Mobil 1 with
    SuperSyn uses high-performance fluids, including polyalphaolefins
    (PAOs), along with a proprietary system of additives. Each Mobil 1
    with SuperSyn viscosity grade uses a unique combination of synthetic
    fluids and selected additives in order to tailor the viscosity grade
    to its specific application."
     
    y_p_w, Apr 26, 2005
    #7
  8. I'm sure you've also read the Chevron paper on hydrocracking and its
    benefits.:)... with VI and other characteristics which are more or less as
    good as PAOs.
    Well at least they do specify PAO and one hopes they are using "synthetic"
    in its true sense rather than the BBB Advertising Division adopted term to
    cater for Castrol. I notice that Castrol has taken down their "confession"
    page.:)
     
    George Macdonald, Apr 27, 2005
    #8
  9. spaceaze

    y_p_w Guest

    That may only apply to the Mobil 1 brand. I've heard reports that
    Mobil's semi-synthetics may use group III as their "synthetic"
    component.
     
    y_p_w, Apr 27, 2005
    #9
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.