Stability control

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Ron Jones, Sep 30, 2005.

  1. Ron Jones

    Ron Jones Guest

    I'm trying to decide between the Honda CR-V and the Forester and would
    appreciate your thoughts. Is the lack of stability control system on the
    Subara significant since it is a lower vehicle?
     
    Ron Jones, Sep 30, 2005
    #1
  2. the CR-V doesn't have real all wheel drive - i think they call it "real
    time 4wd" or some crap like that. basically it's a front wheel drive
    vehicle that goes into 4wd mode when it detects slip (i don't know what
    criteria it uses to go back to fwd, but i do know you don't have
    control over it). with subaru, you have a real full time all wheel
    drive system. why do i say this? my theory is that it's better to
    avoid a problem than try to correct it. with the CR-V you have to wait
    until you have a problem before the awd turns on, and then if you're
    still having problems the stability control will try to fix it more.
    with a subaru (or audi quattro, jeep quadratrac, i don't know of any
    other systems that are full time real awd) you have a lower probability
    of getting into a problem because the torque from the motor is always
    being split up 4 ways rather than 2. also, in general i've never been
    too impressed with any of the stability control systems, i always
    notice a problem way before the system reacts to it. there is no
    stability control system that can anticipate what's happening, it has
    to wait for something bad to happen before it can respond.
     
    Mike Deskevich, Sep 30, 2005
    #2
  3. Ron Jones

    AguaGirl Guest

    I think more importantly that the lack of a stability control system is
    insignificant not because of the profile but because of the all the time..
    AWD. There is a pretty big difference between having a car suddenly
    engage the rear wheels when it detects a problem and having a car
    engaging all the wheels all the time. If having the second set of wheels
    engage to correct for slippage is a good idea than isn't a better idea
    not to experience the slippage to begin with? I sometimes wonder if
    the stability control isn't meant to help the 2wd to 4wd transition more
    than for anything else.

    AG
     
    AguaGirl, Oct 1, 2005
    #3
  4. Ron Jones

    Guest Guest

    For a person who is a driver I don't feel I'd go for stability control.

    I understand SC cuts engine power as well as playing with the brakes.
    When I'm in trouble sliding on snow with my FWD cars I've occasionally
    recovered by applying power.

    This driving technique "may be difficult" to do with SC.
     
    Guest, Oct 5, 2005
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.